ay, February 01, 2003 3:10 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: form-based auth
>
>
> "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >
> > > "Craig R. McClanahan"
> Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: form-based auth
> >
> >
> > "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]..
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Bill Barker wrote:
> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 22:54:38 -0800
> From: Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: form-based auth
>
>
> "Craig R. McClana
"Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
>
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Madere, Colin wrote:
>
> > Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 14:06:27 -0600
> > From: "Madere, Colin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Madere, Colin wrote:
> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 14:06:27 -0600
> From: "Madere, Colin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: form-based auth
>
> Anyone out there have multiple contexts (
I add mapping on httpd.conf :
JkMount /auto/login/j_security_check ajp13
...
All works !
- Original Message -
From:
Valeriy
Molyakov
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 2:54
PM
Subject: Help
Dear Ian,I have complet the configuration
and all the stuff but i want to change thecolor combinition and other
lay-out of the world pay page how i can dothis..?Please let me
know.AffanFreezone Internet Ltd.
- Original Message -
From:
Valeriy
Molyakov
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
Vladimir Grishchenko wrote:
>
> Christian Rauh wrote:
> >
> > Vladimir Grishchenko wrote:
> > >
> > > Christian Rauh wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Vladimir Grishchenko wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > I am also facing the same problem and had an idea while reading your
> > > > post. Maybe you can set a frame on
Christian Rauh wrote:
>
> Vladimir Grishchenko wrote:
> >
> > Christian Rauh wrote:
> > >
> > > Vladimir Grishchenko wrote:
> > > >
> > > I am also facing the same problem and had an idea while reading your
> > > post. Maybe you can set a frame on your main page where you want the
> > > login to
Vladimir Grishchenko wrote:
>
> Christian Rauh wrote:
> >
> > Vladimir Grishchenko wrote:
> > >
> > I am also facing the same problem and had an idea while reading your
> > post. Maybe you can set a frame on your main page where you want the
> > login to appear. That frame links to that welcome p
Daniel Lopez wrote:
>
> Hi Vladimir,
>
>
>
> > I'm thinking along the same lines... You could also embed a tiny invisible
> > image in protected area to your front page (named /welcome, for example)
> > and define your login form as /welcome?mode=login, so whenever you're not
> > authorized we
Hi Vladimir,
> I'm thinking along the same lines... You could also embed a tiny invisible
> image in protected area to your front page (named /welcome, for example)
> and define your login form as /welcome?mode=login, so whenever you're not
> authorized welcome page is smart to display you a lo
Christian Rauh wrote:
>
> Vladimir Grishchenko wrote:
> >
> > "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
> > >
> > > * Have the link on your home page exactly has you describe, but have
> > > the link point at a "Welcome To My Application" page inside the
> > > protected area. The fact that this page is p
Vladimir Grishchenko wrote:
>
> "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
> >
> > * Have the link on your home page exactly has you describe, but have
> > the link point at a "Welcome To My Application" page inside the
> > protected area. The fact that this page is protected will trigger
> > the authe
"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
>
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Vladimir Grishchenko wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just wondering if it's possible to get built-in form based authentication to
> > work without the user actually trying to access a protected resource? I want to
> > have a login box on the first p
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Vladimir Grishchenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just wondering if it's possible to get built-in form based authentication to
> work without the user actually trying to access a protected resource? I want to
> have a login box on the first page that users can use to authenticate
> t
Why not implement a unix-style login which gets slower after every duff
attempt?
-Original Message-
From: Randy Layman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 1:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Form-Based Auth and tracking Login Attempts
One
One suggestion might be to modify JDBCRealm so that on unsuccessful
login it updates a database field (like NUM_BAD_LOGINS) to one more than it
is. Then when the magic number is triggered, you don't allow them to login
even with the correct password. When the administrator resets the pa
Mike Slinn wrote:
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I read in org.apache.tomcat.request.JDBCRealm.java that the proper URI
> should be "/j_security_check", and that if the preceeding "/" is not
> present, or if another path is prepended, the path is normalized to
> "/j_security_check".
>
If
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I read in org.apache.tomcat.request.JDBCRealm.java that the proper URI
should be "/j_security_check", and that if the preceeding "/" is not
present, or if another path is prepended, the path is normalized to
"/j_security_check".
If this URI is recognized, and the
"McCay, Larry" wrote:
> vVolf,
>
> I have observed the same behavior on 3.1 and 3.2.1.
>
> I am going to dig in a little deeper to see what security functionality is
> supported at all.
>
Form based security was not supported in Tomcat 3.1, but is supported in 3.2
and 4.0.
Note that you do ***n
vVolf,
I have observed the same behavior on 3.1 and 3.2.1.
I am going to dig in a little deeper to see what security functionality is
supported at all.
thanks,
-larry
-Original Message-
From: uthay
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2/27/01 11:47 AM
Subject: Re: Form based auth
> hmm
> hm, according to servlet specification v2.2:
If you are using servlet then you dont need the extension.
But if your context is say webapps/xxx/
and you have j_security_check.class inside xxx/WEB-INF
then you may want to try
xxx/j_security_check
Uthay
- Original Message -
From: "
Is your file "j_security_check" a jsp file or servlet
If jsp where is the extension!
If servlet you may want to make sure you are giving the correct context
path.
- Original Message -
From: "Herchel Wojciech" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, Febr
24 matches
Mail list logo
