more clearly that there are no problems with coyote.
-reynir
> -Original Message-
> From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 25. júní 2002 10:07
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 4 performance issues - Trying Tomcat 4.1.3 Beta
>
>
Reynir Hübner wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> this is just a follow up on the case,
>
> I've tried serveral combinations to get rid of the memory bug :
>
> tc4.1.5 with jasper1 from tc.4.0.3.
> tc4.1.3 with jasper1 from tc.4.0.3.
> tc4.1.5 with HTTPConnector from tc.4.0.3
> tc4.1.3 with HTTPConnect
cation (in series of
tests).
..
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 24. júní 2002 09:47
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 4 performance issues - Trying Tomcat 4.1.3 Beta
>
>
>
Title: RE: Tomcat 4 performance issues - Trying Tomcat 4.1.3 Beta
Has anyone tried running stress tests using the new JDK 1.4.1 Beta??
Apparently it fixes the Javac memory leak bug. This may not make a difference here ( I believe there might be instance pooling issues), but would be
Reynir Hübner wrote:
> hi Remy,
>
>
>
>>I don't see how opensymphony would create problems, but 4.1.5
>>introduces
>> tag instance pooling. If those are tags which keep a lot of
>>stuff in
>>memory, then I suppose it could hurt.
>
>
> That's what it is. both in memory and on disk.
>
>
Jacob Hookom wrote:
> I have found performance problems with the new Coyote connector, it runs
> fine initially, but after about 2 hours of simple operation, it hangs on
> page requests at 4-6 seconds while at the same time, I can hit the
> standard HTTP connector on a different port, and requests
hi Remy,
>
> I don't see how opensymphony would create problems, but 4.1.5
> introduces
> tag instance pooling. If those are tags which keep a lot of
> stuff in
> memory, then I suppose it could hurt.
That's what it is. both in memory and on disk.
>
> Or it is, as I stated before, an
Reynir Hübner wrote:
> no not really.
>
> but for the reference of what the jsp-pages are doing in this application (that I
>tested), we are using OSCache from www.opensymphony.com, that seems to crack up when
>being run in 4.1.5 (really weird... I dont know what is happening). We are using fe
t Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 4 performance issues - Trying Tomcat 4.1.3 Beta
>
>
> Reynir Hübner wrote:
> > Victor & the others..
> >
> > I've tested tc 4.1.5 and I get very similar problems as I
> did with tc. 4.1.3.
> >
> > if I st
(ms level).
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 3:04 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 4 performance issues - Trying Tomcat 4.1.3 Beta
Reynir Hübner wrote:
> Victor & the others..
>
> I've tested tc 4.
Reynir Hübner wrote:
> Victor & the others..
>
> I've tested tc 4.1.5 and I get very similar problems as I did with tc. 4.1.3.
>
> if I stress/load my application with 10*10 threads I get messages like this on the
>stdout log :
>
> ThreadPool: Caught exception executing
>org.apache.tomcat.ut
the same stress and tests.
Regards
Victor
-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:47 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 4 performance issues - Trying Tomcat 4.1.3 Beta
Howdy,
You're getting that because you need
riday, June 21, 2002 11:44 AM
>To: Tomcat Users List
>Subject: RE: Tomcat 4 performance issues - Trying Tomcat 4.1.3 Beta
>
>More details:
>
>Server
>Compaq Single Processor 512 MB RAM
>Windows 2K
>
>Tomcat
>- Tomcat 4.1.3 Beta, binary distribution running as a servi
t least
I would not use tc4.1.5 for production as it is right now.
-reynir
> -Original Message-
> From: Victor Popiol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 21. júní 2002 15:57
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Tomcat 4 performance issues - Trying Tomcat 4.1.3 Beta
>
Victor Popiol wrote:
> My initial suspition was Jasper. But there have been less and less JSP compilations
>after the site was deployed.
>
> One thing I wanted to try, to rule out Jasper, was to precompile all the JSP's. But
>I can't figure out how to do that. I guess I'll have to write an ant
able to run out of memory yet.
Thanks
Victor
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 4 performance issues - Trying Tomcat 4.1.3 Beta
Victor Popiol wrote:
> It also helped us whe
Victor Popiol wrote:
> It also helped us when we increased the memory. Right now, we have scheduled a daily
>service restart (this is in production :-( ).
>
> I'll be looking forward to your feedback regarding 4.1.5
Since apparently you are not using many static pages, this would seem to
rule
riday, June 21, 2002 11:43 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 4 performance issues - Trying Tomcat 4.1.3 Beta
I had the same problem, increased memory up to 512 and got rid of it.
But it seemd kind of obvious to me that tomcat 4.1.3 was taking way more memory than
4.0.3, for examp
TED]]
> Sent: 21. júní 2002 15:44
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Tomcat 4 performance issues - Trying Tomcat 4.1.3 Beta
>
>
> More details:
>
> Server
> Compaq Single Processor 512 MB RAM
> Windows 2K
>
> Tomcat
> - Tomcat 4.1.3 Beta, binary dist
2 11:44 AM
>To: Tomcat Users List
>Subject: RE: Tomcat 4 performance issues - Trying Tomcat 4.1.3 Beta
>
>More details:
>
>Server
>Compaq Single Processor 512 MB RAM
>Windows 2K
>
>Tomcat
>- Tomcat 4.1.3 Beta, binary distribution running as a service and using
>Tomca
une 21, 2002 9:46 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 4 performance issues - Trying Tomcat 4.1.3 Beta
Victor Popiol wrote:
> I installed Tomcat 4.1.3 beta. Took a while to configure because the hidden issue
>with the user vs username parameter in the datasource definition.
>
apira
Millennium ChemInformatics
>-Original Message-
>From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:46 AM
>To: Tomcat Users List
>Subject: Re: Tomcat 4 performance issues - Trying Tomcat 4.1.3 Beta
>
>Victor Popiol wrote:
>> I ins
Orders of magnitude better.
-Original Message-
From: William Au [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:38 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 4 performance issues - Trying Tomcat 4.1.3 Beta
So how is the performance of Tomcat 4.1.3 comparing to 4.0?
Bill
Victor Popiol wrote:
> I installed Tomcat 4.1.3 beta. Took a while to configure because the hidden issue
>with the user vs username parameter in the datasource definition.
>
> After it has been running for a day, it died. Looking at the logs I found the
>following:
>
> java.lang.OutOfMemoryErr
s12.jar so tomcat will pick it up.
>
> Yoav Shapira
> Millennium ChemInformatics
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Victor Popiol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 4:24 AM
> >To: Tomcat Users List
> >Subject: RE: Tomcat 4 per
!
- Original Message -
From: "Victor Popiol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 5:19 PM
Subject: RE: Tomcat 4 performance issues - Trying Tomcat 4.1.3 Beta
I installed Tomcat 4.1.3 beta. Took a while to co
t Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 4 performance issues - Trying Tomcat 4.1.3 Beta
Howdy,
I know you already solved the problem (was userid).
As an aside, it's a bad idea to unpack 3rd party jars. You probably
want to rename classes12.zip to classes12.jar so tomcat will pick it up.
Yoav Shapi
ginal Message-
>From: Victor Popiol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 4:24 AM
>To: Tomcat Users List
>Subject: RE: Tomcat 4 performance issues - Trying Tomcat 4.1.3 Beta
>
>Hi. I installed Tomcat 4.1.3 and deployed my application. But I
>consistently get
28 matches
Mail list logo
