Try this:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-user&m=107976963131361&w=2
I wasn't able to get it to work myself, but maybe you can.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Whatever works, right?
Does this only apply to tomcat 5 or is it applicable to tomcat 4 as well?
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Barnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 11:00 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
On
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 11:48:02 -0400, Chad Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
This sounds awfully similar to what we are experiencing, although I have
not determined that it is a jk2 related memory leak. Are you using some
sort of profiling tool to determine this? And exactly what does
reque
Michiel Toneman wrote, On 6/2/2004 2:18 AM:
I can confirm that this works with mod_jk too.
I'm a little surprised that fixing this rather horrible memory leak
doesn't appear to be a high priority. We were almost at a point of
abandoning Tomcat altogether since we couldn't keep our test environme
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 3:18 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
Adrian Barnett wrote:
>
>>> Ran out of memory last night again
>>>
>>> Set to 512m and ran out at 284m
>>> Maybe
Message -
From: "Kommuru, Bhaskar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 6:03 AM
Subject: RE: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
> I am just curious in this... Where did you set the
Adrian Barnett wrote:
Ran out of memory last night again
Set to 512m and ran out at 284m
Maybe I am missing a paramater in the tomcat setup on windows or
something
Frustrating
James
I was having a memory leak using mod_jk2, and it was fixed by adding
request.registerRequests=false
to tomcat/co
I am just curious in this... Where did you set the 512m? Is your Tomcat's
JVM size?
>> Ran out of memory last night again
>>
>> Set to 512m and ran out at 284m
>> Maybe I am missing a paramater in the tomcat setup on windows or
>> something
>>
>> Frustrating
>>
>> James
I was having a memory le
Ran out of memory last night again
Set to 512m and ran out at 284m
Maybe I am missing a paramater in the tomcat setup on windows or
something
Frustrating
James
I was having a memory leak using mod_jk2, and it was fixed by adding
request.registerRequests=false
to tomcat/conf/jk2.properties.
I do
nal Message-
From: Mark Lowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 4:55 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
I have this in our startup scripts
export CATALINA_OPTS="-Djava.awt.headless=true -Xmx128m -Xdebug"
Perhaps the debug
A_HOME%/jre/bin/server' to '%JAVA_HOME%/bin' directory
And
use this '-Xms256m -Xms512m'
Changa fer,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Lowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 4:55 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Le
01, 2004 4:55 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
I have this in our startup scripts
export CATALINA_OPTS="-Djava.awt.headless=true -Xmx128m -Xdebug"
Perhaps the debug argument might reveal something. I cant be much help
on windows matters as I
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
300 mb sounds a lot, i've got a hibernate and struts flavored app
running with a 128 limit, and thats being generous.
I haven't measured anything but top looks happy, with 5.0.2
TECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
> 300 mb sounds a lot, i've got a hibernate and struts flavored app
> running with a 128 limit, and thats being generous.
>
> I haven't measured anything but top looks happy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
I've just set 5.0.25 up and it will run with mod_jk/1.2.3-dev and
Apache/2.0.47 , I'll see if i get the same thing happening.
When i was having problems i was getting a decoding
doesnt accept -server.
Ill continue to monitor it with the mod_jk bypass in.
James
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Lowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory
>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 9:04 AM
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
What does your catalina log have to say for itself?
On 31 May 2004, at 13:59, James Sherwood wrote:
As I posted before, I get a memory leak using mod_jk
May 31, 2004 9:04 AM
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
> What does your catalina log have to say for itself?
>
>
>
>
> On 31 May 2004, at 13:59, James Sherwood wrote:
>
> > As I posted before, I get a memory leak using mod_jk 1.2 with Tomcat
> > 5
What does your catalina log have to say for itself?
On 31 May 2004, at 13:59, James Sherwood wrote:
As I posted before, I get a memory leak using mod_jk 1.2 with Tomcat
5.0.25
and Apache 2.049
I beleive it may be related to the mod_jk connector and since I am not
actually serving up anything wit
As I posted before, I get a memory leak using mod_jk 1.2 with Tomcat 5.0.25
and Apache 2.049
I beleive it may be related to the mod_jk connector and since I am not
actually serving up anything with apache yet I want to just bypass the
connector for 1 site and hit tomcat directly. I have to use apa
20 matches
Mail list logo
