Re: Which Connector for Tomcat 4.0.3 - mod_webapp or mod_jk

2002-05-03 Thread Simon Stewart
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 09:55:29AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > One of the goals of mod_jk2 is to go further and be able to operate with > only 'standard' apache directives and configuration ( i.e. and > SetHandler ). That'll be much faster and easier to integrate - but even > more verbos

RE: Which Connector for Tomcat 4.0.3 - mod_webapp or mod_jk

2002-05-02 Thread costinm
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > AIUI, mod_webapp has been easier to configure; mod_jk offers load balancing, The configuration is the same, for the 'basic' things: WebAppDeploy examples /examples is arguably as easy as: JkMount /examples/* tomcat And has the same effect (i.e.

RE: Which Connector for Tomcat 4.0.3 - mod_webapp or mod_jk

2002-05-02 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> >For example, mod_jk won't know that we want > >Tomcat to process a filter chain against a directory unless we've done a > >JkMount for that tree, whereas it would know that Tomcat needs to process a > >JSP page. On the other hand, mod_webapp would know about the filter chain > >because the res

RE: Which Connector for Tomcat 4.0.3 - mod_webapp or mod_jk

2002-05-01 Thread Jacob Kjome
>For example, mod_jk won't know that we want >Tomcat to process a filter chain against a directory unless we've done a >JkMount for that tree, whereas it would know that Tomcat needs to process a >JSP page. On the other hand, mod_webapp would know about the filter chain >because the resource

RE: Which Connector for Tomcat 4.0.3 - mod_webapp or mod_jk

2002-05-01 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> I believe that the official stance is that mod_webapp will be the future of > Apache-tomcat connectors, and it will receive performance and feature > improvements whereas ... This appears to be one of the most common myths regarding Tomcat connectors. The real official stance appears to be that

Re: Which Connector for Tomcat 4.0.3 - mod_webapp or mod_jk

2002-04-19 Thread Jeffrey Bonevich
Cynthia - Here are a couple tomcat-user postings on the differences. They might help: http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-user%40jakarta.apache.org/msg50263.html http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-user%40jakarta.apache.org/msg49707.html They are not quite solid, but they are something. I am s

Re: Which Connector for Tomcat 4.0.3 - mod_webapp or mod_jk

2002-04-19 Thread Pascal Forget
mod_jk supports load balancing across several tomcat servers and also supports serving static content from Apache and *.jsp from tomcat. mod_webapp does not support load balancing, and the decision to forward requests to tomcat are based on whole directories, you cannot use wildcards such as *.js

Which Connector for Tomcat 4.0.3 - mod_webapp or mod_jk

2002-04-19 Thread Cynthia Jeness
I searched the Tomcat and Apache site yesterday for some explanation and/or recommendations for the choice of connector, but a search on "connector" or "mod_webapp" did not seem to provide any information about why I would chooce one over another. Can someone point me to the correct place or expl