Excuse me if this question is obvious. If Tomcat can be run in a standalone
mode, why should it be used in conjunction with apache?
Thanks
Dallas Skinner
Hi, I am new at tomcat.
Why use Apache with tomcat, is it not enough just to use Tomcat. It
works for me, but will it be a problem if i get high traffic on my
server, or is there any other disadvanteges?
Thanks
Jimmy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
bject: Why Use apache
Excuse me if this question is obvious. If Tomcat can be run in a standalone
mode, why should it be used in conjunction with apache?
Thanks
Dallas Skinner
Hello ~
Because it's written in Jakarta's specification : Tomcat serves static
pages worse than Apache or IIS.
Maybe there are other reasons...
Jean-François
>Excuse me if this question is obvious. If Tomcat can be run in a
standalone
mode, why should it be used in conjunction with apache?
tomcat-apache-howto.html
> Excuse me if this question is obvious. If Tomcat can be run in a
standalone
> mode, why should it be used in conjunction with apache?
>
> Thanks
>
> Dallas Skinner
Is there a way to append a URL to the FAQ to every mail to the list?
"Skinner, Dallas M" wrote:
> Excuse me if this question is obvious. If Tomcat can be run in a standalone
> mode, why should it be used in conjunction with apache?
>
> Thanks
>
> Dallas Skinner
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Skinner, Dallas M wrote:
> Excuse me if this question is obvious. If Tomcat can be run in a
> standalone mode, why should it be used in conjunction with apache?
Well, it's been asked many times, so you can check the archives for
answers. But basically, Apache is more reliab
more than 1 Tomcat server
i.e. load balancing multiple TC's behind Apache
Mike.
--
Mike Braden
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Skinner, Dallas M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 10:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Why Use apach
In a word: "speed".
Tomcat is a java application, which runs in a JVM and because of this it runs
fairly slowly.
Apache is (AFAIK) written in C and runs native, and therefore is a lot
faster.
P.
On Wed, 2 May 2001 09:48:24 -0500
"Skinner, Dallas M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RPD> Excuse me i
serving static html files and images.
>also, with apache up and running you can do other stuff like execute cgi
>scripts and so on.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Skinner, Dallas M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 02 May 2001 15:48
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Why U
Apache is faster for serving static pages. ( Images/html )
-Original Message-
From: Skinner, Dallas M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 10:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Why Use apache
Excuse me if this question is obvious. If Tomcat can be run in a
Original Message-
> >From: Skinner, Dallas M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: 02 May 2001 15:48
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Why Use apache
> >
> >
> >Excuse me if this question is obvious. If Tomcat can be run in a
standalone
> >mode, why should it be used in conjunction with apache?
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >Dallas Skinner
>tomcat isn't as good as apache at serving static html files and images.
>also, with apache up and running you can do other stuff like execute cgi
>scripts and so on.
That said, I use it as a standalone web and servlet server. The primary
drawback then becomes:
It does NOT keep logs like a "re
ginal Message-
> From: David M. Rosner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 02 May 2001 16:06
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Why Use apache
>
>
> If I have all my static html and graphics loading off of
> other servers, is
> there any reason to use Apache with T
faster in 'speaking' http
- apache 'speaks' HTTP 1.1, tomcat 3.x speaks only 1.0
- apache is more stable
- apache is more secure
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Duncan Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2001 18:04
> An: '[
)
there is always a cost involved.
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Mauri [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 8:25 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Why Use apache
>
> It depends on which are the other servers...I'd sug
W.r.t. static content: suppose you have a lot of static content and
thus decide to run Apache next to Tomcat, then I wonder: why use the
plugin?
The plugin itself may be a bottleneck if not configured properbly, and
may also be a source of bugs in itself.
I would propose to run Apache on port 80
che Nachricht-
> Von: Peter Mutsaers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2001 10:36
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: RE: Why Use apache
>
>
> W.r.t. static content: suppose you have a lot of static content and
> thus decide to run Apache next
Hi Peter
I'm reading what you're speaking about.
Can you tell me moer about it.
In fact I have Apache running on my server, and I have installed Tomcat,
with jserv_mod.
Only to work with Cocoon.
But the problem is that I haven't yet obtain any result.
I think I have a bad installation of my c
>> "Samuzeau" == Samuzeau Pascal
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Samuzeau> I'm reading what you're speaking about.
Samuzeau> Can you tell me moer about it.
Samuzeau> In fact I have Apache running on my server, and I have
Samuzeau> installed Tomcat, with jserv_mod. Only to work w
ssage-
From: Cybercity_Egen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 3:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Why use apache
Hi, I am new at tomcat.
Why use Apache with tomcat, is it not enough just to use Tomcat. It
works for me, but will it be a problem if i get high traffic
ator
US-Rx, Inc.
Cybercity_Egen wrote:
> Hi, I am new at tomcat.
>
> Why use Apache with tomcat, is it not enough just to use Tomcat. It
> works for me, but will it be a problem if i get high traffic on my
> server, or is there any other disadvanteges?
>
> Thanks
> Jimmy
At 03:06 PM 2/1/01, you wrote:
> So, the answer is it really depends. Look at your usage patterns -
>if its almost exclusively Tomcat-served dynamic content then go with just
>Tomcat. If its mostly static with a few dynamic pages the go with Apache
>and Tomcat. If its in between, exper
far. Not a single crash or
strange error for 2.5 months+.
just my $0.02
Christopher Cato
Rational Software
> -Original Message-
> From: Dennis Doubleday [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: den 1 februari 2001 21:57
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Why use apache
>
We were going to use Apache because it supports SSL. Can Tomcat support
SSL also?
Randy Layman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02/01/2001 03:06:01 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: RE: Why use apache
Tomcat is written in Java. Apache is writte
ennis Doubleday [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 3:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Why use apache
At 03:06 PM 2/1/01, you wrote:
> So, the answer is it really depends. Look at your usage patterns
-
>if its almost exclusively Tomcat-served dynamic cont
ry 01, 2001 3:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Why use apache
We were going to use Apache because it supports SSL. Can Tomcat support
SSL also?
Randy Layman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02/01/2001 03:06:01 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:
> -Original Message-
> From: Dennis Doubleday [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 3:57 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Why use apache
>
>
> At 03:06 PM 2/1/01, you wrote:
>
>> So, the answer is it really de
Title: RE: Why use apache
Yes it does, but I believe that client SSL authentication is broken. At least, it seems to be so in 3.2.1.
j\s
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 3:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Wilko Hische/HADV/NL)
Subject: Re: Why Use apache
[IMAGE]
>> "Samuzeau" == Samuzeau Pascal
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Samuzeau> I'm reading what you're speaking about.
Samuzeau> Can you tell me moer about it.
30 matches
Mail list logo