Why Use apache

2001-05-02 Thread Skinner, Dallas M
Excuse me if this question is obvious. If Tomcat can be run in a standalone mode, why should it be used in conjunction with apache? Thanks Dallas Skinner

Why use apache

2001-02-01 Thread Cybercity_Egen
Hi, I am new at tomcat. Why use Apache with tomcat, is it not enough just to use Tomcat. It works for me, but will it be a problem if i get high traffic on my server, or is there any other disadvanteges? Thanks Jimmy mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Why Use apache

2001-05-02 Thread Ronan Derby
bject: Why Use apache Excuse me if this question is obvious. If Tomcat can be run in a standalone mode, why should it be used in conjunction with apache? Thanks Dallas Skinner

Re: Why USe Apache

2001-05-02 Thread JFC
Hello ~ Because it's written in Jakarta's specification : Tomcat serves static pages worse than Apache or IIS. Maybe there are other reasons... Jean-François >Excuse me if this question is obvious. If Tomcat can be run in a standalone mode, why should it be used in conjunction with apache?

Re: Why Use apache

2001-05-02 Thread Martin Mauri
tomcat-apache-howto.html > Excuse me if this question is obvious. If Tomcat can be run in a standalone > mode, why should it be used in conjunction with apache? > > Thanks > > Dallas Skinner

Re: Why Use apache

2001-05-02 Thread Nick Christopher
Is there a way to append a URL to the FAQ to every mail to the list? "Skinner, Dallas M" wrote: > Excuse me if this question is obvious. If Tomcat can be run in a standalone > mode, why should it be used in conjunction with apache? > > Thanks > > Dallas Skinner

Re: Why Use apache

2001-05-02 Thread Milt Epstein
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Skinner, Dallas M wrote: > Excuse me if this question is obvious. If Tomcat can be run in a > standalone mode, why should it be used in conjunction with apache? Well, it's been asked many times, so you can check the archives for answers. But basically, Apache is more reliab

RE: Why Use apache

2001-05-02 Thread Mike Braden
more than 1 Tomcat server i.e. load balancing multiple TC's behind Apache Mike. -- Mike Braden [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Skinner, Dallas M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 10:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Why Use apach

Re: Why Use apache

2001-05-02 Thread Peter Davison
In a word: "speed". Tomcat is a java application, which runs in a JVM and because of this it runs fairly slowly. Apache is (AFAIK) written in C and runs native, and therefore is a lot faster. P. On Wed, 2 May 2001 09:48:24 -0500 "Skinner, Dallas M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: RPD> Excuse me i

RE: Why Use apache

2001-05-02 Thread David M. Rosner
serving static html files and images. >also, with apache up and running you can do other stuff like execute cgi >scripts and so on. > >-Original Message- >From: Skinner, Dallas M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: 02 May 2001 15:48 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Why U

RE: Why Use apache

2001-05-02 Thread Sadasivakurup, Jiji L.
Apache is faster for serving static pages. ( Images/html ) -Original Message- From: Skinner, Dallas M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 10:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Why Use apache Excuse me if this question is obvious. If Tomcat can be run in a

Re: Why Use apache

2001-05-02 Thread Martin Mauri
Original Message- > >From: Skinner, Dallas M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: 02 May 2001 15:48 > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Why Use apache > > > > > >Excuse me if this question is obvious. If Tomcat can be run in a standalone > >mode, why should it be used in conjunction with apache? > > > >Thanks > > > >Dallas Skinner

RE: Why Use apache

2001-05-02 Thread Doug Fields
>tomcat isn't as good as apache at serving static html files and images. >also, with apache up and running you can do other stuff like execute cgi >scripts and so on. That said, I use it as a standalone web and servlet server. The primary drawback then becomes: It does NOT keep logs like a "re

RE: Why Use apache

2001-05-02 Thread Duncan Irvine
ginal Message- > From: David M. Rosner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 02 May 2001 16:06 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Why Use apache > > > If I have all my static html and graphics loading off of > other servers, is > there any reason to use Apache with T

AW: Why Use apache

2001-05-02 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
faster in 'speaking' http - apache 'speaks' HTTP 1.1, tomcat 3.x speaks only 1.0 - apache is more stable - apache is more secure > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Duncan Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2001 18:04 > An: '[

RE: Why Use apache

2001-05-02 Thread Tony Armstrong
) there is always a cost involved. > -Original Message- > From: Martin Mauri [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 8:25 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Why Use apache > > It depends on which are the other servers...I'd sug

RE: Why Use apache

2001-05-03 Thread Peter Mutsaers
W.r.t. static content: suppose you have a lot of static content and thus decide to run Apache next to Tomcat, then I wonder: why use the plugin? The plugin itself may be a bottleneck if not configured properbly, and may also be a source of bugs in itself. I would propose to run Apache on port 80

AW: Why Use apache

2001-05-03 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
che Nachricht- > Von: Peter Mutsaers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2001 10:36 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: RE: Why Use apache > > > W.r.t. static content: suppose you have a lot of static content and > thus decide to run Apache next

Re: Why Use apache

2001-05-04 Thread Samuzeau Pascal
Hi Peter I'm reading what you're speaking about. Can you tell me moer about it. In fact I have Apache running on my server, and I have installed Tomcat, with jserv_mod. Only to work with Cocoon. But the problem is that I haven't yet obtain any result. I think I have a bad installation of my c

Re: Why Use apache

2001-05-04 Thread Peter Mutsaers
>> "Samuzeau" == Samuzeau Pascal >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Samuzeau> I'm reading what you're speaking about. Samuzeau> Can you tell me moer about it. Samuzeau> In fact I have Apache running on my server, and I have Samuzeau> installed Tomcat, with jserv_mod. Only to work w

RE: Why use apache

2001-02-01 Thread Randy Layman
ssage- From: Cybercity_Egen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 3:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Why use apache Hi, I am new at tomcat. Why use Apache with tomcat, is it not enough just to use Tomcat. It works for me, but will it be a problem if i get high traffic

Re: Why use apache

2001-02-01 Thread Ben Ricker
ator US-Rx, Inc. Cybercity_Egen wrote: > Hi, I am new at tomcat. > > Why use Apache with tomcat, is it not enough just to use Tomcat. It > works for me, but will it be a problem if i get high traffic on my > server, or is there any other disadvanteges? > > Thanks > Jimmy

RE: Why use apache

2001-02-01 Thread Dennis Doubleday
At 03:06 PM 2/1/01, you wrote: > So, the answer is it really depends. Look at your usage patterns - >if its almost exclusively Tomcat-served dynamic content then go with just >Tomcat. If its mostly static with a few dynamic pages the go with Apache >and Tomcat. If its in between, exper

RE: Why use apache

2001-02-01 Thread Cato, Christopher
far. Not a single crash or strange error for 2.5 months+. just my $0.02 Christopher Cato Rational Software > -Original Message- > From: Dennis Doubleday [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: den 1 februari 2001 21:57 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Why use apache >

RE: Why use apache

2001-02-01 Thread Tracy_Getz
We were going to use Apache because it supports SSL. Can Tomcat support SSL also? Randy Layman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02/01/2001 03:06:01 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: RE: Why use apache Tomcat is written in Java. Apache is writte

RE: Why use apache

2001-02-01 Thread Randy Layman
ennis Doubleday [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 3:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Why use apache At 03:06 PM 2/1/01, you wrote: > So, the answer is it really depends. Look at your usage patterns - >if its almost exclusively Tomcat-served dynamic cont

RE: Why use apache

2001-02-01 Thread Randy Layman
ry 01, 2001 3:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Why use apache We were going to use Apache because it supports SSL. Can Tomcat support SSL also? Randy Layman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02/01/2001 03:06:01 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:

Re: Why use apache

2001-02-01 Thread Ben Ricker
> -Original Message- > From: Dennis Doubleday [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 3:57 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Why use apache > > > At 03:06 PM 2/1/01, you wrote: > >> So, the answer is it really de

RE: Why use apache

2001-02-01 Thread Jord Sonneveld
Title: RE: Why use apache Yes it does, but I believe that client SSL authentication is broken. At least, it seems to be so in 3.2.1. j\s -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 3:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re[2]: Why Use apache

2001-05-04 Thread hische
PROTECTED] cc:         (bcc: Wilko Hische/HADV/NL) Subject:        Re: Why Use apache [IMAGE] >> "Samuzeau" == Samuzeau Pascal >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:     Samuzeau> I'm reading what you're speaking about.     Samuzeau> Can you tell me moer about it.