George Vasick writes:
> 3.4.3 is still the official GCC version used for building OpenSolaris. I am
> not aware that any testing has been done with 4.3.x yet. Dtrace should
> work with 4.3.x but I am not sure about mdb. Extensions were made to gcc
> 3.4.3 for the purpose of compiling Solaris, b
One potential issue that I do know about is the -msave-args option. It
is supported by gcc 3.4.3 but not gcc 4.3.x. In looking through the ON
nightly logs, I see that we do use that option in our i386 builds.
Thanks,
George
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> George Vasick wrote:
>> Basabi Bhattachary
George Vasick wrote:
> Basabi Bhattacharya wrote:
>> Would like to know if there is any disadvantages in compiling
>> application/device drivers with Gcc (4.3.x) and running them on
>> OpenSoalris (128a) built with Sunstudio12. I'd assume that all debugging
>> tools (mdb and dtrace) should work as
Basabi Bhattacharya wrote:
> Would like to know if there is any disadvantages in compiling
> application/device drivers with Gcc (4.3.x) and running them on
> OpenSoalris (128a) built with Sunstudio12. I'd assume that all debugging
> tools (mdb and dtrace) should work as expected. I was able to com
Would like to know if there is any disadvantages in compiling
application/device drivers with Gcc (4.3.x) and running them on OpenSoalris
(128a) built with Sunstudio12. I'd assume that all debugging tools (mdb and
dtrace) should work as expected. I was able to compile OpenSolaris with Gcc
(SUN