Hi Dan,
I have given the webrev a cursory review and have not noticed anything
that looks broken. But as a previous contributor, reviewer and a user
I have some nits:
The changes add to the mishmash of ksh vie sh functionality.
For example "[[" vie "[" for test and "print" vie "echo" for output
On Wed 26 Jul 2006 at 03:09PM, Stacey Marshall wrote:
> Hmm,
>
> from home I found my suggested fix for the Next Prev. buttons did not work
> and I have thus had
> to revert back to:
>
> parent.lhs.location.replace(parent.lhs.location.pathname + "#" + num);
> parent.rhs.location.repl
Hmm,
from home I found my suggested fix for the Next Prev. buttons did not work and
I have thus had
to revert back to:
parent.lhs.location.replace(parent.lhs.location.pathname + "#" + num);
parent.rhs.location.replace(parent.rhs.location.pathname + "#" + num);
To have both the b
Hi Daniel,
Perhaps others have commented, I don't see the replies on the thread!
Certainly like the idea of placing the specific SCCS comments at the top of
each page and
providing the PDF file (something I create separately). The idea of creating a
patch is novel too.
With regard to the 'Fra
