Re: [Toolserver-l] Future of the toolserver

2012-09-30 Thread Carl (CBM)
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Erik Moeller wrote: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Krinkle wrote: >> I just wanted to make sure you >> know that there are confirmed and scheduled plans for Wikimedia Labs to have >> a >> live db replication arranged between the labs cluster and the wmf prod

Re: [Toolserver-l] Future of the toolserver

2012-09-30 Thread Thehelpfulone
On 30 Sep 2012, at 18:24, Krinkle wrote: > Ah, I understand the confusion now. > > If I understand correctly Samuel was talking about the (future) labs > environment, not the Toolserver. The above citation from Erik, however, is > about > the Toolserver (not Labs). This is where you have misu

[Toolserver-l] Maintenance of s2 and s5 Monday, 1st October

2012-09-30 Thread Marlen Caemmerer
Hello, as tomorrow is maintenance window anyway I will add more disk space to s2 and s5. In the time of the work the databases s2 and s5 will not be available. This will take about 1-1.5 hours and I will do it when DaB checks the hemlock & web server interaction at 20 - 22 UTC. Cheers

Re: [Toolserver-l] Future of the toolserver

2012-09-30 Thread Erik Moeller
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Samuel Klein wrote: > I am not writing as a WMF trustee, but in my personal capacity as a > community member interested in the toolserver. This is a fairly operational > discussion, and not something discussed by the board; I only know about it > because I read th

Re: [Toolserver-l] Future of the toolserver

2012-09-30 Thread Erik Moeller
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Krinkle wrote: > I just wanted to make sure you > know that there are confirmed and scheduled plans for Wikimedia Labs to have a > live db replication arranged between the labs cluster and the wmf production > cluster. As far as I know there are no considerations

Re: [Toolserver-l] Future of the toolserver

2012-09-30 Thread Krinkle
On Sep 30, 2012, at 2:21 PM, Platonides wrote: > On 30/09/12 03:31, Krinkle wrote: >> On Sep 29, 2012, at 9:41 PM, Samuel Klein wrote: >>> And why is the WMF considering not providing db replication for it? >> >> [citation needed] >> >> I think you misunderstood. >> >> -- Krinkle > > Written

Re: [Toolserver-l] Future of the toolserver

2012-09-30 Thread Samuel Klein
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Andrei Cipu wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 25, 2012, Delphine Ménard wrote: > > > >we can't at this stage enter in expensive improvements, because Labs is, > >in the short to mid-run, destined to replace the "toolserver as you know > it" > >>completely. It falls under the

[Toolserver-l] Reboot of the linux-boxes at Monday 19:05 UTC

2012-09-30 Thread DaB.
Hello all, because of a kernel-upgrade I have to reboot our linux-boxes (nightshade, yarrow and mayapple). This will happen tomorrow, Monday, 19:05 UTC. I will reboot the boxes one after the other, each reboot should not take more than 10 minutes. If you use SGE (like you should) your task wil

Re: [Toolserver-l] Future of the toolserver

2012-09-30 Thread Platonides
On 30/09/12 03:31, Krinkle wrote: > On Sep 29, 2012, at 9:41 PM, Samuel Klein wrote: >> And why is the WMF considering not providing db replication for it? > > [citation needed] > > I think you misunderstood. > > -- Krinkle Written by Erik Moeller the 25th Sep: > Chapters are autonomous organi

Re: [Toolserver-l] Future of the toolserver

2012-09-30 Thread Andrei Cipu
> > From: Samuel Klein >To: Wikimedia Toolserver >Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 10:41 PM >Subject: Re: [Toolserver-l] Future of the toolserver > > > >On Tue, Sep 25, 2012, Delphine Ménard wrote: > >we can't at this stage enter in expensive improvements, b