Hello,
If I think positive, I have the hope that we can move relatively shortly
the 20% of tools to labs that are producing 80% of our load. So than we
should come back in a stable situation on toolserver with acceptabel
performance. This "stable time" we can use than to run tools until they
a
Silke Meyer wrote:
> Dear toolserver crowd, especially dear WMDE members among you!
> tldr;
> I am asking the WMDE members committed to the toolserver: What can be
> a satisfactory state of the server given this strange situation of
> transition?
> [...]
I would start with fixing the current s
On 04/29/2013 03:12 AM, Maarten Dammers wrote:
> Moving to early gives bad user experience and gives disappointed users
> who turn their back on it (like me).
That may well be the case; I have been careful to invite early adopters
who had tools that had full support for now (i.e. do not require DB
Hi Marc,
Op 29-4-2013 1:22, Marc A. Pelletier schreef:
On 04/28/2013 07:15 PM, DaB. wrote:
Even more useful would have been a "We improved since last time, please come
and check again".
Well, I /do/ take some pains to post regular updates, on labs-l and here
as well. :-) Watch for emails fro
On 04/28/2013 07:15 PM, DaB. wrote:
> Even more useful would have been a "We improved since last time, please come
> and check again".
Well, I /do/ take some pains to post regular updates, on labs-l and here
as well. :-) Watch for emails from me (generally on Mondays) on those
lists.
Also, [1]
Hello,
At Monday 29 April 2013 01:11:46 DaB. wrote:
> On 04/28/2013 04:42 PM, Maarten Dammers wrote:
> > I tried labs and I hate it, if someone tries to force it on my now I'll
> > just shut down my tools and leave.
>
> Even more useful would be a list of actual issues you've encountered, so
> tha
On 04/28/2013 04:42 PM, Maarten Dammers wrote:
> I tried labs and I hate it, if someone tries to force it on my now I'll
> just shut down my tools and leave.
Even more useful would be a list of actual issues you've encountered, so
that we may address them in the future.
That said, "far from ready
Op 27-4-2013 18:00, DaB. schreef:
Hello,
At Saturday 27 April 2013 17:19:29 DaB. wrote:
To cut a long story short: I am not sure what you expect me to do in
this situation. Please clarify! I don't want to deal with a task
without a clear task.
as a WMDE-member and toolserver-admin I would like
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 4:25 AM, Silke Meyer wrote:
> * When does the toolserver no longer accept new accounts? Tool Labs
> shall be ready in weeks. Once it's there, I think it would be fair to
> send new people to Tool Labs right away.
OH? They finally have the cross db-join situation sorted?
W
Hello,
At Saturday 27 April 2013 17:19:29 DaB. wrote:
> To cut a long story short: I am not sure what you expect me to do in
> this situation. Please clarify! I don't want to deal with a task
> without a clear task.
as a WMDE-member and toolserver-admin I would like to answer you.
I expect you to
Dear toolserver crowd, especially dear WMDE members among you!
tldr;
I am asking the WMDE members committed to the toolserver: What can be
a satisfactory state of the server given this strange situation of
transition?
A few thoughts about the current state of the toolserver. This e-mail
is born b
11 matches
Mail list logo
