Re: Topband: Unintentional QRM on TB

2012-01-25 Thread Rik van Riel
On 01/25/2012 03:56 PM, W0UCE wrote: > There is unintentional QRM on all bands when DX is working Split. People > don't check to make sure they are using SPLIT and TX on the DX stations > calling freq. > > I know this for fact as I have been unintentionally guilty > myself for not looking to make

Re: Topband: T Vertical feed

2012-01-25 Thread Jerry Keller (K3BZ)
Dave, Filipe, anyone. my helix-wound vertical has a couple of elevated radials, which are not grounded. Everything sits above "ground", fed direct with 50 ohm coax, about 20 ohms R at feedpoint. I have a 2.5 : 1 SWR in the shack over about 60 KHz of the band. I haven't had it up very long

Re: Topband: Unintentional QRM on TB

2012-01-25 Thread Jim F.
Sure glad I found this TB reflector with the scoop on everything from antennas to protocol.   I would be lost without the sage advice of my big (signal) brothers. . 73   jim / W1FMR         --- On Wed, 1/25/12, Glenn Wyant wrote: From: Glenn Wyant Subject: Re: Topband: Unintentional QRM on TB

Topband: Will operate for food CQ 160

2012-01-25 Thread k3bu
Anyone has idle station or needs operating help in CQ 160? K3BU will travel and operate for food, jus' tired from resort business and need a radio break. Yuri, K3BU.us ___ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

Re: Topband: T Vertical feed

2012-01-25 Thread Dave Mueller
Fil, My 80/160m antenna is configured identically to yours on 160m. Same dimensions. In my case, with 90 radials of various lengths, I measured an Rr of 16 ohms at the feed point. The SWR exceeded 2:1 in the shack. I use a hairpin coil recommended by K2KW (Team Vertical) to bring the impeda

Re: Topband: Unintentional QRM on TB

2012-01-25 Thread W0UCE
There is unintentional QRM on all bands when DX is working Split. People don't check to make sure they are using SPLIT and TX on the DX stations calling freq. I know this for fact as I have been unintentionally guilty myself for not looking to make sure... Woops... Sorry, 73, Jack If you he

Re: Topband: T Vertical feed and radials

2012-01-25 Thread W0UCE
Filipe: Why bother putting out radials when you can use a K2AV 160 Meter Folded Counterpoise? Take a look: http://www.w0uce.net/K2AVantennas.html 73, Jack W0UCE -Original Message- From: topband-boun...@contesting.com [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of ct1...@sapo.pt S

Re: Topband: T Vertical feed

2012-01-25 Thread DAVID CUTHBERT
The radiation resistance is 25 ohms. I estimate your base referred ground loss resistance to be 10 ohms. So, you should expect a VSWR of 1.4:1 fed directly with 50 ohm coax. To obtain a better match you could place a shunt inductor (start with 4 uH) across the feedpoint but you will have to shorte

Re: Topband: T Vertical feed

2012-01-25 Thread Jim Brown
On 1/25/2012 11:27 AM, ct1...@sapo.pt wrote: > My question is regarding the feeding of the antenna, should it be > straight with 50 Ohm cable? Hi Filipe, That's the best solution, assuming that you have a tuner in the shack (or an amplifier with a tuned output that can handle a modest mismatch),

Topband: T Vertical feed

2012-01-25 Thread ct1ilt
Hi Everyone, just finishing puting up a T Vertical (exactly in T shape) using 2 supports at the ends. The vertical portion is 18m and the T is 17m to each side (34m total). I am laying radials from 20m - 40m (have about 20 right now). My question is regarding the feeding of the antenna, shoul

Re: Topband: Unintentional QRM on TB

2012-01-25 Thread Guy Olinger K2AV
Worked them during a "12" period right on 1812. He was only listening exactly on 12 and at the time was clearly having a hard time hearing. 73, Guy. On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 1:49 PM, N1BUG wrote: > > I listened to HK0NA this morning around 1.8328 and he was sending > > "12" after his CQ. and

Re: Topband: Unintentional QRM on TB

2012-01-25 Thread N1BUG
> I listened to HK0NA this morning around 1.8328 and he was sending > "12" after his CQ. and folks were madly calling 12 Khz up, and > 12 Khz down from his frequency. While it may not be an every day thing, this is common enough on topband so that anyone seriously attempting to work DX there

Re: Topband: Unintentional QRM on TB

2012-01-25 Thread Glenn Wyant
If you hear a DX station working people , and cant hear the callers ... well I suggest you tune around until you find the pileup... easy ! Using 1812 allowed him to work NA and JA No matter what some people just never clue in ... Glenn VA3DX Subject: Re: Topband: Unintentional QRM on TB Jim,

Re: Topband: Unintentional QRM on TB

2012-01-25 Thread Jim Hoge
Jim, I disagree with your final comment. The sender is always responsible for insuring he won't cause interference to ongoing communications when he comes on frequency. Yes, the directions from HK0NA were unclear but I would venture he was listening for JAs as their bandplan limits their operat

Topband: Unintentional QRM on TB

2012-01-25 Thread Jim F.
I listened to HK0NA this morning around 1.8328 and he was sending "12" after his CQ. and folks were madly calling 12 Khz up,  and 12 Khz down from his frequency.   Also lots of callers were calling around  1.812.    All I have is RIT on the 5w. Elecraft K1 and couldn't work him even if I had dua

Re: Topband: Caged Inv-L - Pros and Cons ?

2012-01-25 Thread ZR
Id expect the lower RF resistance of 2X more wire would help also. My only cage experience were a pair of 1/4 wave verticals for 80 that were also fed as half waves on 40 at a prior QTH here in the same town. The cage was 6 #12 wires 12" in diameter; 2:1 BW was almost 400KHz on 80 and resonance

Re: Topband: Looking for a few Last states on 160m

2012-01-25 Thread Julius Fazekas
That's great news! WAZ would be of GREAT interest to me. Hopefully, that won't be in the too distant future. LoTW seems to be easily to use for those chasing counties too. Cooperation to benefit the larger community always makes sense in my opinion. I'd also like to join with Jim complimenting