I agree with what others have said. Best thing I did here in my noisy area was
a Rx antenna. There's no way I could listen to my inverted L here in KY. KB4QZH
Original message From: daraym...@iowatelecom.net Date: 4/19/20
12:35 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Peter Krulewitch ,
topband@co
On 4/19/2020 11:57 AM, terry burge wrote:
I've been contemplating putting up and inverted V on 160 meter too in hopes it
could give me more 'local' coverage and a quieter background noise.
If you're going to add an antenna of that size, a good RX antenna system
seems a better investment of yo
I have an inverted L. Unfortunately it is noisey but I do the best I can. I've
been contemplating putting up and inverted V on 160 meter too in hopes it could
give me more 'local' coverage and a quieter background noise. One of many
projects I'd like to get done as usual. I've also considered a
SigAssuming your interested in DX, your “L” with four elevated radials will
handily beat an inverted vee the vast majority of the time.
73. . . Dave, W0FLS
From: Peter Krulewitch
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 12:12 PM
To: Joe
Cc: daraym...@iowatelecom.net ; topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re
>>> The inverted L will out perform and inverted vee, hands down, 90% of the
>>> time. The few exceptions will probably be near your local SR (and other
times) when horizontal polarization can work better Dave, W0FLS<<<
This conclusion regarding probability is supported through numerous
obse
I should have stated for the comparison that I have 4 elevated radials under
the inverted L W2LL
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 19, 2020, at 12:49 PM, Joe wrote:
>
> An Inverted "L" is more or less a vertical, but the upper half got bent
> over correct?
>
> So a major part of an inverted "L"
Peter,
It depends on a lot of things: ground characteristics, number of radials,
height of radials and the overall height available.
Generally, over average-to-good ground and with 32 or more radials, the
inverted L will perform better for DX at anything up 100', most of the time.
If you can pu
An Inverted "L" is more or less a vertical, but the upper half got bent
over correct?
So a major part of an inverted "L" just as in a regular vertical is the
ground system.
Correct?
Now how elevated radials work great in a regular vertical, only need
like 4 to equal miles of wire in ground m
The inverted L will out perform and inverted vee, hands down, 90% of the
time. The few exceptions will probably be near your local SR (and other
times) when horizontal polarization can work better.73. . .
Dave, W0FLS
-Original Message-
From: Peter Krulewitch
Sent: Sunday
Have used inverted L with 90 apex for several years but wonder whether
comparison tests or experiences with inverted V at that height compares. Tnx
fer your ideas.W2LL
Sent from my iPhone
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
Common darkness between VE6 and EU is getting shorter by the day, but as long
as the geo-mag cooperates, the band remains open.
Last night I was able to work ON7PQ, ON8DM, G4UFK and G3XHZ from between
0400-0500z. Lots of QSB, but signal strengths high on the QSB peaks. Early
last week I was ab
11 matches
Mail list logo
