Frank,
“Must” is a strong word. What goes wrong if you cross them?
73, Carl WS7L
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 9:47 PM wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
>
> While bonding the radials is desirable, its not essential. But you
> must NOT cross the radials over each other.
>
>
> ...
> 73
> Frank
> W3LPL
>
>
>
>
>
>
Nice to hear all the comments, recommendations, and indeed some success
stories here. I too have a treadmill problem. Although I'm blessed with a
radio-friendly spouse who always asks before she starts it up, I'd like to
add a line filter. Ferrites on the cord don't by themselves squelch it.
Thanks to all for the comments. I will pass them along to Dale, who is not
on the reflector at this time.
(I need HH on 160 too!)
73, Carl WS7L
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
I guess Jim must have missed the opening last January. On the 8th through
10th I put PA, S5, GD, SM, OH, LA, and TF in the log from Oregon - 4 new
ones plus a couple old friends. Heard about a dozen other EU entities on
the 8th but the pileups were too ferocious for me to break. That was the
first
Interesting. On every other band from the West coast, south is usually
better. I've always blamed the auroral zone for that. I guess this is a
case of 160 once again showing its unique character.
73, Carl WS7L
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Jim Brown j...@audiosystemsgroup.comwrote:
I
On my 80 meter NTS net last evening (1830 local time) I noticed that the
critical frequency had dropped below 3.5 MHz. I could barely hear some
stations that were only 40 miles away and my neighbor Claire N7CM reported
that she heard no one but me. (No problem working 5T0SP, however, which
I'm weighing in with Tom here. The reciprocity theorem in electromagnetism
is well known, and it shows that no amount of focusing, defocusing,
scattering, refraction, or reflection will by themselves cause one way
propagation. If you take away the earth's magnetic field and its attendant
Faraday
Yes, a good point that I neglected. This entirely circumvents my yammerings
about reciprocity. Reciprocity is a characteristic of a single pair of
ports in a network. Introducing separate receive antennas can surely cause
a one way effect. Consider what happens when I hook up a dummy load as a Rx
If I send CQ...CQ...K9JWV...K9JWV...K - and someone arrives on frequency
...
Which gives me an opening to air a pet peeve. NEVER when contesting (or
DXing) send a K after your call sign! Maybe not so bad for a 1x3 or 2x3
(though still possibly confusing with QSB) but it can be deadly with a 1x2
Heard you CQing 5 x 5 here in Oregon last night, Herb. I didn't have time to
get into the test this weekend so I was just having a quick listen to see
what was up. Can't fathom why you didn't get any answers.
73, Carl WS7L
-Original Message-
Gentlemen, I have been calling CQ tonight
Another constant irking remarks extant is the use of Roger
in place of
over or go ahead. To which I always remark...my name is
Herb, not
Roger... Roger?
Heh heh. Good one, Herb.
Adhering to ITU phonetics one should say Romeo but I've never heard that.
73, Carl WS7L
-Original Message-
One thing to think about in this discussion - is where the
current goes
as it diminishes as you work your way along a 1/4 wave wire
(let's not bring the inductor into it just now for this
discussion). I have never really thought about this - but
one of our
12 matches
Mail list logo
