I have to disagree with some of what has been said about how much power to run
using JT65.
JT65 is a LOW SIGNAL mode, NOT a LOW POWER mode.
We run 1500 watts into 20+ dB gain antennas on 2 meters for EME. Signals
coming back from the moon vary between –10 and –29 dB
Why limit yourself on
th these settings. 72/73 de Jim
Rodenkirch K9JWV
From: Topband <topband-boun...@contesting.com> on behalf of KX4TT via Topband
<topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 7:05 AM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Sept 12 JT65 on 1838khz...nice opening
Brian Pease wrote:
> JT-65 is a QRP mode, like WSPR where I use10W. High power can ruin it for
> everyone else. Read the documentation.
>
It is NOT a QRP mode, it is a weak signal mode, not the same thing. On 160
often a QRO mode to give a weak signal at the other
need as much power.
73
Len
SM7BIC
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] För CT1EKD
Skickat: den 17 mars 2017 12:50
Till: topband@contesting.com
Ämne: Re: Topband: Sept 12 JT65 on 1838khz...nice opening to Eu.
Hi Jorge
Hi Jorge
JT65 is no diferent
I've used 100 watts on 160 - by accident, as I forgot to turn down the drive -
I discovered that decoding can be a real problem at high power levels. I've
seen signals from a station 30 miles (50 km) away that wouldn't decode
because of spreading. I believe the main goal is to have little or
2017 12:50
Till: topband@contesting.com
Ämne: Re: Topband: Sept 12 JT65 on 1838khz...nice opening to Eu.
Hi Jorge
Hi Jorge
JT65 is no diferent from CW or SSB, more power is better...use no more than 50%
of your amplifier power, if you have an extra fan use it on top of your
amplifier..
Pedro
Hi Jorge
Hi Jorge
JT65 is no diferent from CW or SSB, more power is better...use no more
than 50% of your amplifier power, if you have an extra fan use it on
top of your amplifier..
Pedro - ct1ekd
Citando Jorge Diez - CX6VM :
Hello
so how much power to use in
Hello
so how much power to use in JT65 on 160 mts for DX ?
15-25 watts in OK on high bands, but how much pwr people are using on 160
mts?
thanks,
Jorge
2015-09-12 14:51 GMT-03:00 Jim Brown :
> On Sat,9/12/2015 7:33 AM, Mike Waters wrote:
>
>> How much of this was
On Sat,9/12/2015 7:33 AM, Mike Waters wrote:
How much of this was JT9? Is it ALL JT65?
It's all JT65.
Notice all the CQs going unanswered. Except for the Ukraine station,
those EU stations all had pretty good signals at your QTH, good enough
that some of the guys in W1/W2 should have copied
-Original Message-
From: Mike Waters
Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2015 10:33 AM
To: topband
Subject: Re: Topband: Sept 12 JT65 on 1838khz...nice opening to Eu.
How much of this was JT9? Is it ALL JT65?
73, Mike
www.w0btu.com
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com
Thanks, Jim. Maybe I'll stick with WSPR, at least for awhile. Per the Sept.
10 thread about VK2KRR, there seems to be some 160m activity on that mode.
I've enjoyed WSPR in the past, but the Linux version of the software I was
using at the time would crash at odd intervals. Hopefully, downloading
I have had many across the pond WSPR reports over the years.
I'll have to give JT65 a try as well.
Mike va3mw
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Mike Waters wrote:
> Thanks, Jim. Maybe I'll stick with WSPR, at least for awhile. Per the Sept.
> 10 thread about VK2KRR, there
0108 -17 0.4 1234 # CQ K2QQ FN03 ~U. States
0110 -18 0.4 1230 # KC2YIL K2QQ -08
0112 -17 0.4 1225 # KC2YIL K2QQ RRR
0114 -18 0.4 1225 # KC2YIL K2QQ 73
0123 -7 0.4 1756 # CQ N2GZ FN31 ~U. States
0125 -5 0.4 1755 # WB4JWM N2GZ -16
0127 -8 0.2 1755 #
How much of this was JT9? Is it ALL JT65?
73, Mike
www.w0btu.com
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
14 matches
Mail list logo