Re: Topband: EZNEC Ground Errors

2020-12-11 Thread List Mail
It's interesting how people's experiences differ, and how their perceptions of how something actually works, and how a computer model calculates how it should work. I have used MMANA-GAL to model designs, and it certainly helps to quantify my measurements, and is a good start. "Your Mileage May

Topband: EZNEC Ground Errors

2020-12-11 Thread Roger Kennedy
Oh that's something else I forgot to mention . . . A couple of years ago I built a 160m Receiving Loop, which is Vertically polarised. It behaves very differently to my Dipole, I can see huge differences on European signals, depending on how far away they are, and the Propagation at the time.

Re: Topband: EZNEC Ground Errors

2020-12-11 Thread Grant Saviers
For a literal "pair of radio wave glasses": Given the vertical gain of a practical 160 dipole is pretty much cloud burner and a decent 160 vertical is pretty much low angle, IF you know the actual real gain patterns, then it is possible to compare signal amplitudes (probably real time consider

Re: Topband: EZNEC Ground Errors

2020-12-11 Thread John Kaufmann via Topband
well as or sometimes better than the 8-circle. 73, John W1FV -Original Message- From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces+john.kaufmann=verizon@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Artek Manuals Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 9:39 AM To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Re: Topband: EZNEC Ground

Topband: EZNEC Ground Errors

2020-12-11 Thread Roger Kennedy
Well I agree with that too Dave . . . To me, it's a kind of "Urban Myth" that 160m DX is all Low Angle propagation. Sure, on 80m it nearly ALWAYS is . . . You MUST have a Vertical to work DX well on 80, a Dipole is rubbish (even though my 80m dipole is effectively twice as high as my Top Band

Re: Topband: EZNEC Ground Errors

2020-12-11 Thread Artek Manuals
OR The propagation mode on 160 is not what we have popularly come to "Accept". There is a growing body of evidence that particularly at gray line that signals often arrive at a higher angles. This is often attributed to "ducting" . Maybe a lot more of 160 intercontinental propagation isĀ  due

Topband: EZNEC Ground Errors

2020-12-11 Thread Roger Kennedy
Guy I have ALWAYS thought that the various Computer-based modelling of Ground and its effect on Antennas is WAY off . . . And surely the errors are MOST significant on 160m, not just because Antennas are near the ground (in wavelength terms) . . . but also because even the ground 130 ft deep is