Ham radio, like life in general, is evolving. With a lot of technology
change, it's a good time to breath some fresh air
and let it jell out.
E30FB did work a few NA, but only on signal peaks. Other wise they had
problems receiving in deep QRM. (Even VE1ZZ had to repeat his call).
73
Jim, I take no side (yet) on this issue but RHR has changed that game.
If you can't afford to build the remote station, you can easily rent a
station for any contest and use it.
That is entirely within the rules as they exist today.
73, Andy N2NT
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Jim Brown
On Tue,3/17/2015 10:10 AM, Art Snapper wrote:
The easiest answer IMHO, is to drop any distinction between a receiver and
transmitter.
In other words, if you are going to remote a receiver, you might as well
remote the whole station.
Remoting an entire station (TX/RX) is far more complex, and
Xtreme category, where have I heard that term?
Classical 160 meter operating involves real estate and the expenditure of lots
of money or time for effective transmitting and receiving antenna systems and
amplifiers. This is accomplished mostly by old men with lots of spending money
and time
Hey Mike,
This is why we work hard all our lives, so we can earn enough to do
this. I, too, was on a small city lot most of my life. Noe I'm not
(earned it).
Dave, W5UN
On 3/17/2015 4:44 PM, mstang...@comcast.net wrote:
Xtreme category, where have I heard that term?
Classical 160 meter
The easiest answer IMHO, is to drop any distinction between a receiver and
transmitter.
In other words, if you are going to remote a receiver, you might as well
remote the whole station.
Art
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Dave Blaschke, w5un w...@wt.net wrote:
Hey Mike,
This is why we
On Tue,3/17/2015 9:44 AM, mstang...@comcast.net wrote:
Classical 160 meter operating involves real estate and the expenditure of lots
of money or time for effective transmitting and receiving antenna systems and
amplifiers. This is accomplished mostly by old men with lots of spending money
