llsouth.net >
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>> Yes, I agree. It's supposed to be fun. Let the broadcasters be the ones to
>>get upset about reception and propagation.
>>73s
>>Ham KB4BR
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Topband [mailto:topb
esting.com] On Behalf Of Ken
>Claerbout
>Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 12:11 PM
>To: Topband@contesting.com
>Subject: Topband: TZ4AM
>
>I thought 160 Meters was the Gentleman's band? Some of you need to take a
>deep breath and relax. Surely you have more important
er 16, 2017 12:11 PM
To: Topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: TZ4AM
I thought 160 Meters was the Gentleman's band? Some of you need to take a
deep breath and relax. Surely you have more important things in your lives?
Jeff knows he has an RX problem and he's working on it. What
Topband ; Don Kirk ; K1FZ-Bruce
> Subject: Re: Topband: TZ4AM
>
>
> wait a minute. I think Jeff can hear ok. He heard MY puny signal on
> 160m...it was not easy, but it IS possible without 10kw..
> 73, good luck, w5xz, dan
>
>
>On Monday, October 16, 2017 10:29 AM, Victo
pband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: TZ4AM
I thought 160 Meters was the Gentleman's band? Some of you need to take a
deep breath and relax. Surely you have more important things in your lives?
Jeff knows he has an RX problem and he's working on it. What more can he
do? Topband i
Well said Ken!
Rich K7ZV
On Mon, October 16, 2017 9:11 am, Ken Claerbout wrote:
> I thought 160 Meters was the Gentleman's band? Some of you need to take
> a deep breath and relax. Surely you have more important things in your
> lives?
>
> Jeff knows he has an RX problem and he's working on it.
I thought 160 Meters was the Gentleman's band? Some of you need to take a deep
breath and relax. Surely you have more important things in your lives?
Jeff knows he has an RX problem and he's working on it. What more can he do?
Topband is difficult and frustrating from many locations. A litt
Zalnerauskas ; Topband ; Don Kirk ; K1FZ-Bruce
Subject: Re: Topband: TZ4AM
wait a minute. I think Jeff can hear ok. He heard MY puny signal on
160m...it was not easy, but it IS possible without 10kw..
73, good luck, w5xz, dan
On Monday, October 16, 2017 10:29 AM, Victor Goncharsky via Topband
wrote
wait a minute. I think Jeff can hear ok. He heard MY puny signal on 160m...it
was not easy, but it IS possible without 10kw..
73, good luck, w5xz, dan
On Monday, October 16, 2017 10:29 AM, Victor Goncharsky via Topband
wrote:
HI Stein,
What my good old friend Saulius wants to say is
HI Stein,
What my good old friend Saulius wants to say is that there's no chance to work
TZ4AM from here in Central Europe unless one has 10 kW and at least full size
vertical. I'm personally not paying attention to both RBN and cluster 160m
TZ4AM spots anymore.
On the other hand, we have worke
Thanks, I will.
2017-10-16 04:45 popiet "Stein-Roar Brobakken" rašė:
> Hi
> LY5W, Try go to africa and join the QRN!
>
> I been in africa twice on dxped, also in pacific.
>
> Not all spots had less than S8-s9+20 dbs noise level from time to time.
>
> I also operated 160m and experienced signals
Hi
LY5W, Try go to africa and join the QRN!
I been in africa twice on dxped, also in pacific.
Not all spots had less than S8-s9+20 dbs noise level from time to time.
I also operated 160m and experienced signals «skipping» over a distance.. so he
migth have wrong skip!!
Best Regards,
Stein-Ro
Hi Sam (LY5W),
Check out the QRZ page for TZ4AM for info on equipment (including antennas).
Don (wd8dsb)
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Saulius Zalnerauskas
wrote:
> They think what I am wrong. But true - TZ4AM no copy 99% stations.
> Wonder what trcvr he is using and other RX ?
>
> Sam LY5W
They think what I am wrong. But true - TZ4AM no copy 99% stations.
Wonder what trcvr he is using and other RX ?
Sam LY5W
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Victor Goncharsky wrote:
> Raoul,
> Tonight there was the usual TZ4AM's multi CQ with no response. Made a few
> calls as need TZ on top but
Raoul,
Tonight there was the usual TZ4AM's multi CQ with no response. Made a few calls
as need TZ on top but no answer. At the moment running 900w and 27.5m top hat
vertical so barefoot/dipole is not the case here.
Never had problems working that part of Africa, the only one missed last year
wa
Yes Raoul,
160 meters is a competitive band. Not just competing with each other, but
with varying conditions,
Usually a small/poor transmit antenna needs a large radial field to get a
good low angle signal out.
Local Noise:
Years ago I had a very strong background noise, that turned out
I agree! And not everybody have space for good RX antennas.And even if we can
install a good RX antenna in limited space, cheap Chinese products are making
it worse, it is a struggle to hear anything.
The other problem is, I use at least 600 watts on 160m, and some EUs try to
work you with a 1
Africa is a high noise location. Jeff is working on his antennas,
Meanwhile giving as many contacts as he can copy.
As his receive antennas improve, hope you find yourself in his log.
73
Bruce-k1fz
On Sat, 14 Oct 2017 03:23:54 +0300, Saulius Zalnerauskas wrote:
But no copy as always.
But no copy as always.
RX problems
LY5W
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 8:33 PM, K1FZ-Bruce wrote:
> Jeff, TZ4AM hopes to be on 160 meters tonight around 0300 UTC. He
> likes ~ 1826.5, 1827.5 and usually operates split.
>
> Band Conditions are not good but hope for an improvement.
>
>
>
Jeff, TZ4AM hopes to be on 160 meters tonight around 0300 UTC. He
likes ~ 1826.5, 1827.5 and usually operates split.
Band Conditions are not good but hope for an improvement.
73
Bruce-k1fz
.
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
20 matches
Mail list logo
