Dear all,
When trying to promote shacl we typically run into the question:
Why can't we just use OWL with CWA-interpretation (incl. non-UNA)?
Some reasoners even have a "switch".
We then say:
* Shacl (core) is more powerful
* Shacl will later (when?) cover shacl-af for rules, so inlin
One reason would be that there is no standard CWA-interpretation of RDFS/OWL.
Such semantics is not defined. Of course, one could decide how it should work,
but it would be their own decision or a decision of a vendor who has such
“switch capability”..
With two different interpretation of the s
Is there a sensible way to manage a text file in EDG?
One option would be the equivalent of SXML - where every line is an
entitiy with a line number and string value - and its a matter of ordering
to recreate.
(i.e. if a SPARQLmotion script is appending to a file in a loop, can I make
it w
On 04-12-2018 23:18, Irene Polikoff wrote:
SHACL has some support for the UI generation.
Irene, could you elaborate on that? Which part of SHACL Core do you see
as supporting UI generation?
Regards,
Peter
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid