To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] Classlevel properties?
On 6 Mar 2019, at 12:32, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users
mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote:
Hi David,
Thx and fully agree the wkt-issue!
In att. I actually pro
sers@googlegroups.com>> On Behalf Of dprice
> Sent: woensdag 6 maart 2019 12:35
> To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] Classlevel properties?
>
> Hi Michel,
>
> Just remembered that the ISO 15
..@tno.nl]
> Subject: Re: FW: [topbraid-users] Classlevel properties?
>
> Hi David, Irene, Richard
>
> FWIW saying “owl-wise not ok” is inaccurate. To be accurate you need to say
> "OWL DL (aka Direct Semantics)-wise not ok”. OWL Full (aka RDF-based
> Semantics) does not
Verzonden van mijn Android-telefoon via TouchDown (www.symantec.com)
-Original Message-
From: Michel Böhms [michel.bo...@gmail.com]
Received: zondag, 03 mrt. 2019, 11:55
To: Bohms, H.M. (Michel) [michel.bo...@tno.nl]
Subject: Re: FW: [topbraid-users] Classlevel properties?
Hi David
FWIW saying “owl-wise not ok” is inaccurate. To be accurate you need to say
"OWL DL (aka Direct Semantics)-wise not ok”. OWL Full (aka RDF-based Semantics)
does not mind.
If the intent is that a property like Height is a class (e.g. “2 metre” is the
class with members being all things that are
Yes, I agree. It is also important to understand the use cases to be supported
by this model and how exactly you will implement them.
For example:
Why have Height as a class to begin with - if these resources will not carry
any properties, could they be just literals? The statement regarding
What is your concern about OWL?
When you say that prefUnit for a class is ‘m’, from either RDF or OWL
perspective, you are not saying anything about the class members. You are
saying something about the class itself as a resource, not about a set of
resources that comprise it.
If you mean it
Someone proposed the following pattern:
ex:Height rdf:type owlClass ;
rdfs:subClassOf opm:Property ;
prefUnit "m" ;
quantityKind cdt:length .
Seems turtlewise ok.
Seems rdfwise ok. Guess same as rdfwise
Seems owlwise not ok...giving properties other than annotation properties to a
class.
