Re: [topbraid-users] Question on SPARQL Web Pages File(.swp)

2022-02-04 Thread Holger Knublauch
I don’t think so, and as of 7.1 TBC is no longer the recommended IDE for developing EDG extensions and features. .swp files are not widely used and may at some stage get deprecated too. I have no insights on how many customers actually use them. Do you have many such files? Moving forward, with

Re: [topbraid-users] Question on SPARQL Web Pages File(.swp)

2022-02-04 Thread Tim Smith
The bummer part of this product architecture change is now it is impossible to utilize the excellent model driven application capabilities that have always been a part of TBC without buying EDG server. I like the EDG environment but I dont necessarily need the data governance capabilities (e.g th

Re: [topbraid-users] Question on SPARQL Web Pages File(.swp)

2022-02-05 Thread 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users
I very much support this comment. I hope TQ comes with a solution soon... Michel Op 4 feb. 2022 22:55 schreef Tim Smith : The bummer part of this product architecture change is now it is impossible to utilize the excellent model driven application capabilities that have always been a part of TB

Re: [topbraid-users] Question on SPARQL Web Pages File(.swp)

2022-02-05 Thread David Price
Hi, Irene explained the approach and rationale in a response to this forum at 7.1 Beta release: *As stated in the release notes, running EDG within TBC was never exactly the same as running EDG server. Supporting this mode complicated certain aspects of our codebase and still was not 100% the sam

RE: [topbraid-users] Question on SPARQL Web Pages File(.swp)

2022-02-07 Thread 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users
r in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages. From: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of David Price Sent: zaterdag 5 februari 2022 14:22 To: 'Felix Sasaki' via TopBraid Suite Users Subjec

Re: [topbraid-users] Question on SPARQL Web Pages File(.swp)

2022-02-07 Thread deviredd...@gmail.com
Hi Holger, Yes, we have few SPARQL Web Pages File(.swp) files and Many RDF/SWP files(.ui.ttlx). I understand that as of 7.1 SPARQLMotion servlet/feature has been removed and also that at some stage SPARQL Web Pages File(.swp) feature will be removed. Any idea on what will happen to RDF/SWP fi

Re: [topbraid-users] Question on SPARQL Web Pages File(.swp)

2022-02-07 Thread David Price
> On 7 Feb 2022, at 08:57, deviredd...@gmail.com > wrote: > > Hi Holger, > > Yes, we have few SPARQL Web Pages File(.swp) files and Many RDF/SWP > files(.ui.ttlx). > > I understand that as of 7.1 SPARQLMotion servlet/feature has been removed and > also that at some stage SPARQL Web Pages

Re: [topbraid-users] Question on SPARQL Web Pages File(.swp)

2022-02-08 Thread Holger Knublauch
> On 7 Feb 2022, at 7:57 pm, deviredd...@gmail.com > wrote: > > Hi Holger, > > Yes, we have few SPARQL Web Pages File(.swp) files and Many RDF/SWP > files(.ui.ttlx). > > I understand that as of 7.1 SPARQLMotion servlet/feature has been removed and > also that at some stage SPARQL Web Page