Re: [tor-dev] Comparing Stem, metrics-lib, and zoossh

2015-10-01 Thread Karsten Loesing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Philipp and iwakeh, hello list, Damian and I sat down yesterday at the dev meeting to talk about doing a comparison of the various descriptor-parsing libraries with respect to capabilities, run-time performance, memory usage, etc. We put

[tor-dev] Hello, I am a Tor Browser user in China. Currently, many obfs4 bridges are blocked by China's firewall.

2015-10-01 Thread Li Xiaodong
*Hello, I am a Tor Browser user in China. Currently, many obfs4 bridges are blocked by China's firewall. When will SkypeMorph Pluggable Transports and Dust Pluggable Transports be deployed in Tor Browser? There are no directory servers in I2P network. Can Tor learn from I2P? If Tor user have to

Re: [tor-dev] Onion Services and NAT Punching

2015-10-01 Thread Nathan Freitas
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015, at 01:15 AM, Andreas Krey wrote: > On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:12:53 +, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote: > ... > > Are there any use cases that: > > * need NAT punching, > > * don???t need service location anonymity, and > > * would benefit from lower latency? > > Of course. All

Re: [tor-dev] Hello, I am a Tor Browser user in China. Currently, many obfs4 bridges are blocked by China's firewall.

2015-10-01 Thread David Fifield
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 08:55:33PM +0800, Li Xiaodong wrote: > Hello, I am a Tor Browser user in China. Currently, many obfs4 bridges are > blocked by China's firewall. When will SkypeMorph Pluggable Transports and > Dust Pluggable Transports be deployed in Tor Browser? There are no directory >

Re: [tor-dev] Hello, I am a Tor Browser user in China. Currently, many obfs4 bridges are blocked by China's firewall.

2015-10-01 Thread Yawning Angel
On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 08:26:50 -0700 David Fifield wrote: > I don't know about a schedule for deploying SkypeMorph and Dust. They > may not help in your case anyway. The GFW is probably blocking the IP > addresses of your bridges, not detecting the obfs4 protocol itself.

[tor-dev] Hello, thank you very much for your help. I really appreciate it.

2015-10-01 Thread Li Xiaodong
*Hello, thank you very much for your help. I really appreciate it. In this afternoon of China Time, I found a obfs4 bridge which is usable in China. The speed of Tor Browser connecting with obfs4 bridge, and the speed of Tor Browser connecting with Meek Azure, which is faster? It is more difficult

[tor-dev] Hello, thank you very much for your help. I really appreciate it.

2015-10-01 Thread Li Xiaodong
*Hello, thank you very much for your help. I really appreciate it. I don't know how long I can use the obfs4 bridge which I found. Maybe after two weeks the obfs4 bridge which I found would be blocked by China's firewall.* ___ tor-dev mailing list

Re: [tor-dev] Hello, thank you very much for your help. I really appreciate it.

2015-10-01 Thread David Fifield
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 12:05:49AM +0800, Li Xiaodong wrote: > Hello, thank you very much for your help. I really appreciate it. In this > afternoon of China Time, I found a obfs4 bridge which is usable in China. The > speed of Tor Browser connecting with obfs4 bridge, and the speed of Tor >

[tor-dev] Hello, thank you very much for your help. I really appreciate it.

2015-10-01 Thread Li Xiaodong
*Hello, thank you very much for your help. I really appreciate it. Below is the URL of the webpage which contains the technical documentation of I2P.* *https://geti2p.net/en/docs * *The weak point of I2P is that the speed is slow.* *The strong point of Tor is that

[tor-dev] Blocking-resistance in I2P (Was Re: Hello, I am a Tor Browser user in China. Currently, many obfs4 bridges are blocked by China's firewall.)

2015-10-01 Thread str4d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Yawning Angel wrote: > [Folding in the 2nd reply] >> If you know some details of how I2P resists blocking, please add >> them to this wiki page: >> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/PluggableTransports > >> > It doesn't do anything

[tor-dev] Expanding services: Single-onion and OnioNS

2015-10-01 Thread Hugo Maxwell Connery
Hi, Having reviewed the last couple of months of tor-dev mails, i can see that there are many proposals afoot to expand the uptake of tor hosted services. These range from a new service type, single-onion [0], to load balancing of tor hosted services [1], to hosting new name/value pairs