On 7/6/12 10:34 AM, Sathyanarayanan Gunasekaran wrote:>> OK; Megan and
Erik, after you incorporate the export function into
>> Descriptor in stem, please start reading through the Django tutorial.
>
> I'm not sure if Django is a good choice for this project. We don't
> require such a heavy web
> Is this available yet?
Yep - https://github.com/gsathya/pyonionoo It's pretty hacky(it was
meant to be a prototype to see if Cyclone was a good idea - and well,
i like it) and will probably have to be refactored.
> So we need to decide on both some milestones and also what various people
> ough
On 7/9/12 12:09 PM, Sathyanarayanan Gunasekaran wrote:
Is this available yet?
Yep - https://github.com/gsathya/pyonionoo It's pretty hacky(it was
meant to be a prototype to see if Cyclone was a good idea - and well,
i like it) and will probably have to be refactored.
Based on a quick look,
On 7/10/12 5:36 PM, Norman Danner wrote:
>
>
> On 7/9/12 12:09 PM, Sathyanarayanan Gunasekaran wrote:
>>> Is this available yet?
>>
>> Yep - https://github.com/gsathya/pyonionoo It's pretty hacky(it was
>> meant to be a prototype to see if Cyclone was a good idea - and well,
>> i like it) and wil
> On APAF (anonymous python application framework) GSoc project, to build
> cross-platform Windows, OSX, Linux applications including Tor there is
> the use of Twisted+Cyclone.
I'm still not clear though - what is the advantage of providing
Onionoo as a hidden service? We shouldn't add dependencie
On 7/10/12 6:18 PM, Damian Johnson wrote:
>> On APAF (anonymous python application framework) GSoc project, to build
>> cross-platform Windows, OSX, Linux applications including Tor there is
>> the use of Twisted+Cyclone.
>
> I'm still not clear though - what is the advantage of providing
> Oniono
> So basically if you would like to make a desktop application including
> Onionoo & Atlas together to provide an end-user an application that he
> can download to query/search/analyze the Consensus, APAF it's a good choice.
> If you just need to do it for a single application that does not need to
> Based on a quick look, it seems like Cyclone provides a slightly nicer way
> to specify how to handle the various requests than does a plain Twisted web
> application. Are there any other advantages to using Cyclone as opposed to
> plain Twisted?
Cyclone provides a much nicer API than Twisted w
Norman Danner writes:
> Based on a quick look, it seems like Cyclone provides a slightly
> nicer way to specify how to handle the various requests than does a
> plain Twisted web application. Are there any other advantages to
> using Cyclone as opposed to plain Twisted?
>From what I understand
I agree, Twisted is not a web application framework. So the question is
this: do we want/need a web application framework for Onionoo? It
seems like it is such a straightforward service (process one of a very
few different request types, send back a JSON response) that maybe any
web applicat
(Side-conversation that got off of tor-dev@, bring it back.)
Based on what Sathya has to say, along with our own playing around with
plain Twisted, I'm inclined to agree that Cyclone provides enough extra
value to justify the additional dependency.
Sathya, do you want to work on the back-end
> Sathya, do you want to work on the back-end while we work on the front-end
> (starting with the code you've already written)?
Okay.
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
On 07/10/2012 05:36 PM, Norman Danner wrote:
Based on a quick look, it seems like Cyclone provides a slightly nicer
way to specify how to handle the various requests than does a plain
Twisted web application. Are there any other advantages to using
Cyclone as opposed to plain Twisted?
To me,
13 matches
Mail list logo
