Dear Anupam and list members,
Just made a count and the sad truth is that 35 out of 167 systems in total
completed the task ending with a regular slash24-220.scamper entry. Thats
even worse than i expected and way more completed test results are necessary...
--
Mit freundlichen Grüssen / Sinc
On 20/01/2014 10:36 PM, Sebastian Urbach wrote:
Dear Anupam and list members,
Just made a count and the sad truth is that 35 out of 167 systems in
total completed the task ending with a regular slash24-220.scamper
entry. Thats even worse than i expected and way more completed test
results are ne
Hi!
Am 2014-01-20 12:36, schrieb Sebastian Urbach:
Just made a count and the sad truth is that 35 out of 167 systems in
total completed the task ending with a regular slash24-220.scamper
entry. Thats even worse than i expected and way more completed test
results are necessary...
I am just won
Hi,
Of course there are systems still working on the task and probably there
will be a few more wit a complete set of results. Considering the fact that
this project is running for a few months now and based on the starting
dates you can see it does not look good so far.
From what i can see
Hi Sebastian,
thank you for your quick reply.
Am 2014-01-20 14:22, schrieb Sebastian Urbach:
Of course there are systems still working on the task and probably
there will be a few more wit a complete set of results. Considering
the fact that this project is running for a few months now and base
On Sun, 2014-01-19 at 15:38 +, Mateusz Błaszczyk wrote:
> Hey
>
> I am wondering if this is a coincidence but since I started the tor relay, I
> see a lot of TCP/8118 connections attempts on my relay's external IP.
>
> I run the offending source IPs (aggregated to /24s) through cymru's ip-to
Hi
I am running tor 0.2.4.20 from official RPM repositories on my local
machine (Fedora 20). I can use it to surf the web and
https://check.torproject.org/ (besides others) tells me that tor is
running. I had the same problem with 0.2.3.25 from fedora's own
repository.
According to `netstat -tulp
On 1/17/2014 9:24 PM, nano wrote:
> On 18/01/2014 12:30 PM, eliaz wrote:
>> On 1/15/2014 8:19 AM, nano wrote:
>>> On 15/01/2014 10:29 PM, Sebastian Urbach wrote:
[...]
>>>
>>
>> I've been thinking for a while that a separate list for *bridge*
>> operators might be a good idea.
[snip
Hi Konrad,
Please check if your files looks like this:
slash24-220.ips
slash24-220.scamper
It would be a lower value than 220 though, just an example. You could check
if there is a scamper and or traceroute process running.
The speed and the filename documented on the site are indicating tha
Hi list,
I have set up a tor relay with no exit functionality yet. Having read
through the documentation and general legal hints, I am still unsure
of the legal situation in Germany. Are there some of you guys who
had contact with hosting providers because of abuse claims?
Is there anything
(Copy to the list)
Hi there,
runing a non-exit relay is usually deemed safe, a separate
abuse-handling is not necessary (because no exit-connections happen,
that might infringe laws, but only connections to other tor nodes).
You should however check the terms of service of your provider to make
Hy dear mailing list Traceroute maintainers.
At the moment three relays are doing the traceroutescript with scamper.
All of them started yesterday evening, somewhat 24hours ago.
Listed down in below you find some outputs, maybe these are helpful.
NODE 1
/Traceroute-results$ ls -la
total 9532
Hi elrippo,
Thanks for participating ! Your logs are looking good.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüssen / Sincerely yours
Sebastian Urbach
--
Those who would give up essential Liberty,
to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve
neither Liberty nor Safety.
On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 20:57:07 -0600
Anupam Das allegedly wrote:
> Dear Tor relay operators,
> We have recently received a good
> rate of participation by relay operators to our measurement project.
> To give everyone an idea of the current participation rate we
Hi Mick,
Thanks for participating ! And another relay hits the road :-)
--
Mit freundlichen Grüssen / Sincerely yours
Sebastian Urbach
--
Those who would give up essential Liberty,
to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve
neither Liberty nor Saf
On 01/20/2014 05:08 PM, t...@gmx.info wrote:
> I have set up a tor relay with no exit functionality yet. Having read
> through the documentation and general legal hints, I am still unsure
> of the legal situation in Germany. Are there some of you guys who
> had contact with hosting providers becaus
Hi Chris,
First of all, this mailing list is public and posting a Tor log with your
IP in there is not advisable, so I would suggest to remove sensitive data
prior to attaching the log next time ;). Some remarks on the log file you
posted:
- Your OpenSSL version was not compiled with options that
Besides, did you know that your relay was last listed in the consensus
database on the 10th of January with an older version of Tor (0.2.3.25)?
Did you happen to change something on that day? Are you also possible
running a firewall of which you could post the configuration?
Regards,
Viktor
2014
On 01/20/2014 03:13 PM, Christian Stadelmann wrote:
> According to `netstat -tulpen` tor listens on 0.0.0.0:9001,
> 0.0.0.0:9030, and Control port + Socks port.
> I configured my Router to port-forward 9001 and 9030 for both TCP+UDP
> and IPv4+IPv6. How can I test that this worked?
>From the log,
Hej,Is your relay at home? Is your relay in your country?The exits which I have in Germany are the fastest and are no worry at all especially because I am far away.There have been 5,000 relays and exits each day for some time yet there has been not one real legal problem, to my knowledge.Peo
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:08 AM, wrote:
> Are pure relays safe to use or
> are the hosting providers still clueless?
>
This may come across as hostile, it is not intended as such.
The hosting providers are as clueless as we are. If, despite your research
of the law in Germany, you are unsure,
21 matches
Mail list logo
