[tor-relays] IPv6 Only Exit Node

2015-12-15 Thread Hans Wurscht
Hi I would like to operate an IPv6 only exit node. I.e. it's fine if tor relays through IPv4, but I want exiting traffic only through IPv6 (because I don't want my (only) IPv4 to be blocked, abused and such). The way I thought this would work is with the ExitPolicy set as below. But atlas

Re: [tor-relays] IPv6 Only Exit Node

2015-12-15 Thread Martin Kepplinger
Am 2015-12-15 um 18:23 schrieb Hans Wurscht: > Hi > > I would like to operate an IPv6 only exit node. I.e. it's fine if tor > relays through IPv4, but I want exiting traffic only through IPv6 > (because I don't want my (only) IPv4 to be blocked, abused and such). > > The way I thought this would

Re: [tor-relays] IPv6 Only Exit Node

2015-12-15 Thread Tim Wilson-Brown - teor
> On 16 Dec 2015, at 04:23, Hans Wurscht wrote: > > Hi > > I would like to operate an IPv6 only exit node. I.e. it's fine if tor relays > through IPv4, but I want exiting traffic only through IPv6 (because I don't > want my (only) IPv4 to be blocked, abused and such). You won't

Re: [tor-relays] Webiron at it again...

2015-12-15 Thread Tyler Durden
They are a pain in the ass. We did block them on our mail server and reported to our ISPs that they often send false-positives. Like UDP DDoS from our exit nodes. Stuff like that. This calmed our ISPs. We also tried to speak to them but they don't answer or when they did it was in a rude way.

Re: [tor-relays] Unused Tor exit nodes capacity

2015-12-15 Thread Dirk Eschbach
Hello everyone, thanks for replying. I did some further checks as you suggested. In the meantime I removed MaxAdvertisedBandwidth since the default should do. I pinned the ExitNode in my Client and downloaded an Ubuntu image. Download was between 800 kbyte/s and 1 Mbyte/s. Not great - but not

Re: [tor-relays] Unused Tor exit nodes capacity

2015-12-15 Thread nusenu
> Unfortunately no better results so far. > I did not yet set up an local resolver - does it make such a difference > ? yes. example: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2015-July/007402.html > Finally a set logfiles to debug Please be cautious when running an exit on debug

Re: [tor-relays] Unused Tor exit nodes capacity

2015-12-15 Thread Tim Wilson-Brown - teor
> On 16 Dec 2015, at 09:07, Dirk Eschbach wrote: > > ... > > Finally a set logfiles to debug and started greping for err: > > Dec 15 22:55:50.000 [info] {EDGE} connection_edge_process_relay_cell(): > 617: end cell (misc error) for stream 7289. Removing stream. > Dec

Re: [tor-relays] Unused Tor exit nodes capacity

2015-12-15 Thread Dirk Eschbach
Hello again, I reply to nusenu/teor in this mail below mixed. > here delays reading from network sockets, or packet loss, or something similar Not really - mtr to google.com -

Re: [tor-relays] Handling abuse request about stopforumspam.com

2015-12-15 Thread Tim Wilson-Brown - teor
> On 15 Dec 2015, at 18:24, Eran Sandler wrote: > > Hi guys, > > One of my tor server seems to be getting a lot of abuse reports from the ISP > from stopforumspam.com . > > http://www.stopforumspam.com/ipcheck/212.47.246.21 >

Re: [tor-relays] uptime "algorithm"

2015-12-15 Thread Tim Wilson-Brown - teor
> On 15 Dec 2015, at 13:12, Nima Fatemi wrote: > > Roger Dingledine: >> We should somehow teach everybody that losing their flags for a few days >> is totally fine and normal, and even something to be proud of because >> you took a useful step at keeping your Tor relay safe and

[tor-relays] Webiron at it again...

2015-12-15 Thread Schokomilch NOC
Monday we received their usual spam about our exit-node sending spam, and of course instead of implementing the TorDNSEL on their sites, they rather want us to block a whole /24 range. Anyhow, one line caught our eyes: "Tor: Please note as the abuse from Tor has gotten out of hand, we do not

Re: [tor-relays] Webiron at it again...

2015-12-15 Thread Tim Wilson-Brown - teor
> On 16 Dec 2015, at 01:43, Schokomilch NOC wrote: > > Monday we received their usual spam about our exit-node sending spam, and of > course instead of implementing the TorDNSEL on their sites, they rather want > us to block a whole /24 range. > > Anyhow, one line caught

Re: [tor-relays] Unused Tor exit nodes capacity

2015-12-15 Thread Josef 'veloc1ty' Stautner
Hello Dirk, mtr or downloading Ubuntu is not a valid task to check your network connectivity. Your server may has a connection speed of 1 GBit/s but that not the traffic you can push the whole time. It depends on multiple factors. For example: I've a dedicated server in the netherlands with 1