Re: [tor-relays] IRC operator meeting - February 7th

2019-02-06 Thread Colin Childs
Hello everyone, I have an apology to make: When planning this meetup, I handled the timezone conversion incorrectly on my end and I intended for this to be held at 8:00PM CST (GMT-6) on Thursday, February 7th. This announcement should have read that the meetup is occurring on Friday,

Re: [tor-relays] 2 ip addresses at the same device, works except for the DirPort

2019-02-06 Thread teor
Hi, On February 6, 2019 7:38:26 PM UTC, "Toralf Förster" wrote: >I ordered a 2nd ip address for my server and put them in the first >order in my network configuration. I'm not sure I understand what your network config is, and what you expected to happen. Try setting the Address option. Tor

[tor-relays] 2 ip addresses at the same device, works except for the DirPort

2019-02-06 Thread Toralf Förster
I ordered a 2nd ip address for my server and put them in the first order in my network configuration. I do wonder, why this adapted torrcconfiguration: $> cat /etc/tor/torrc # torrc at tor-relay # PIDFile /var/run/tor/tor.pid DataDirectory /var/lib/tor/data Nickname zwiebeltoralf

Re: [tor-relays] plans to require ContactInfo to be non-empty

2019-02-06 Thread teor
Hi, On February 6, 2019 10:48:29 AM UTC, grarpamp wrote: ... > >And if nicknames go away (status on that proposal), >then contact is likely to absorb that function, including >the current always present nature of nickname. There is no proposal to remove Nicknames. The authorities don't vote

Re: [tor-relays] plans to require ContactInfo to be non-empty

2019-02-06 Thread grarpamp
On 2/5/19, Roman Mamedov wrote: >> Nicknames are required to be non-empty, did that stop any abuse? > Correction: Nicknames default to "Unnamed" when unset. > However did any of the recent abuse or suspected-malicious relays actually > use "Unnamed"? The consensus contains quite some fraction