Re: [tor-relays] Making use of new bandwidth

>> On 8 Apr 2019, at 07:57, teor wrote: >> >>> The reason I ask is that I wonder if I should run a second Tor instance or >>> if the current one will be able to make use a a reasonable part of the >>> 500Mps. >> >> It looks like your relay could be CPU-core-limited, or limited by some other

Re: [tor-relays] Making use of new bandwidth

Hello, If Tor doesn't scale on multicore CPUs, setting NumCPUs to 2 and running two threads has no effect at all on throughput? Thanks, Conrad On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 7:02 AM wrote: > > Am 06.04.2019 21:19, schrieb Logforme: > > > The reason I ask is that I wonder if I should run a second Tor

Re: [tor-relays] Making use of new bandwidth

One more thing: > On 8 Apr 2019, at 07:57, teor wrote: > > Hi, > >> On 7 Apr 2019, at 05:19, Logforme wrote: >> >> I run the non-exit relay: >> https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/855BC2DABE24C861CD887DB9B2E950424B49FC34 >> The relay run on a debian stretch machine with an

Re: [tor-relays] Making use of new bandwidth

Hi, > On 7 Apr 2019, at 05:19, Logforme wrote: > > I run the non-exit relay: > https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/855BC2DABE24C861CD887DB9B2E950424B49FC34 > The relay run on a debian stretch machine with an i5-4670 at 3.8GHz with 4GB > memory. CPU usage at 250Mbps traffic is

Re: [tor-relays] is a good idea to run a ssh honeypot?

On 04/07/2019 12:52 PM, caioau wrote: > Hi, I been running a relay for almost 1,5 year, and in the beginning I didn't > change the default 22 ssh port but a lot of people were trying to login , no > worries I only allow public key authentication. > > So I was wondering if I could record the

Re: [tor-relays] is a good idea to run a ssh honeypot?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I use ufw as my firewall and it's set to limit ssh so if there's someone brute forcing the ssh it will get blocked for a time Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Sunday, April 7, 2019 7:54 PM, Elmar Otter

[tor-relays] is a good idea to run a ssh honeypot?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, I been running a relay for almost 1,5 year, and in the beginning I didn't change the default 22 ssh port but a lot of people were trying to login , no worries I only allow public key authentication. So I was wondering if I could record the

Re: [tor-relays] FallbackDir

Submit your fingerprints to co...@torproject.org :-) > On Apr 7, 2019, at 08:51, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote: > > Is their a need for any more FallbackDirs? > > Thanks, > > Conrad > > -- > Conrad Rockenhaus > https://www.rockenhaus.com > Cell: (254) 292-3350 > Fax: (254) 875-0459 >

[tor-relays] FallbackDir

Is their a need for any more FallbackDirs? Thanks, Conrad -- Conrad Rockenhaus https://www.rockenhaus.com Cell: (254) 292-3350 Fax: (254) 875-0459 ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org

Re: [tor-relays] Making use of new bandwidth

Am 06.04.2019 21:19, schrieb Logforme: The reason I ask is that I wonder if I should run a second Tor instance or if the current one will be able to make use a a reasonable part of the 500Mps. I'm also testing it with one to three instances. My problem is, I only have 30TB traffic / month.

Re: [tor-relays] exit operators: tor-exit-notice.html file needs updating to solve 404

Am 07.04.2019 13:00, schrieb Toralf Förster: ... tor-exit-notice_DE.html I did not know the translations yet. Thank you! If someone else is looking for: https://github.com/chgans/tor-exit-notice Grüße aus Bonn ;-) -- Ciao Marco! ___

Re: [tor-relays] exit operators: tor-exit-notice.html file needs updating to solve 404

On 4/7/19 12:58 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: > On 4/7/19 12:33 PM, nusenu wrote: >> www.torproject.org >> becomes: >> 2019.www.torproject.org > Ah thx - so the FQDN was meant. And this should made it: sed -i -e 's/www.torpr/2019.www.torpr/g' tor-exit-notice_DE.html ? -- Toralf PGP C4EACDDE

Re: [tor-relays] exit operators: tor-exit-notice.html file needs updating to solve 404

On 4/7/19 12:33 PM, nusenu wrote: > www.torproject.org > becomes: > 2019.www.torproject.org Ah thx - so the FQDN was meant. -- Toralf PGP C4EACDDE 0076E94E signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-relays mailing list

Re: [tor-relays] exit operators: tor-exit-notice.html file needs updating to solve 404

Toralf Förster: > On 4/6/19 9:17 AM, nusenu wrote: >> upstream: >> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/30052 > I do not understood > " the fix is easy: just add 2019. at the beginning of the domain." > there :-/ Let me show it with an example: www.torproject.org becomes:

Re: [tor-relays] exit operators: tor-exit-notice.html file needs updating to solve 404

On 4/6/19 9:17 AM, nusenu wrote: > upstream: > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/30052 I do not understood " the fix is easy: just add 2019. at the beginning of the domain." there :-/ -- Toralf PGP C4EACDDE 0076E94E signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature