Re: [tor-relays] Emerald Onion's new relays

Hi, > On 16 Aug 2019, at 01:02, NOC wrote: > > On 15.08.2019 00:50, teor wrote: >> >> On 14 Aug 2019, at 03:42, NOC wrote: >> >>> On 12.08.2019 23:39, teor wrote: On 13 Aug 2019, at 05:08, Roman Mamedov wrote: > On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 00:46:50 + > Christopher

Re: [tor-relays] Attack on Tor exit and back-up directory server

Hi, > On 16 Aug 2019, at 04:22, potlatch wrote: > > One question remains: At any time I look there are 20-150 Iranian IP > addresses trying to access the Tor server. Their IP range is from 5.113.x.x > to 5.126.x.x. None have hashed fingerprints. Is it okay to let these guys > go? Can

Re: [tor-relays] Measuring the Accuracy of Tor Relays' Advertised Bandwidths

Hi, > On 17 Aug 2019, at 18:11, Toralf Förster wrote: > > Signed PGP part > On 7/26/19 4:18 PM, Rob Jansen wrote: >> I am planning on performing an experiment on the Tor network to try to gauge >> the accuracy of the advertised bandwidths that relays report in their server >> descriptors. >

Re: [tor-relays] removal from the Fallback Directory list

Hi, > On 14 Aug 2019, at 22:50, contact-tor-tur...@g0b.eu wrote: > > hello, I managed until now the relay tor-turing - > 8456DFA94161CDD99E480C2A2992C366C6564410 - ip 62.210.254.132 for four years > and it was in the list of Fallback Directory. However he did not answer for 2 > weeks, the

[tor-relays] Fwd: Emerald Onion's new relays

Hi, We didn't clear the moderation queue last week, and this message was dropped from the queue. We'll make sure someone is looking at the queue every 1-3 days in future. T Begin forwarded message: >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 09:02:58PM +0200, li...@for-privacy.net wrote: >>> On 12.08.2019

Re: [tor-relays] Emerald Onion's new relays

On 15.08.2019 00:50, teor wrote: Hi, On 14 Aug 2019, at 03:42, NOC mailto:t...@afo-tm.org>> wrote: On 12.08.2019 23:39, teor wrote: On 13 Aug 2019, at 05:08, Roman Mamedov > wrote: On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 00:46:50 + Christopher Sheats

[tor-relays] Very high CPU Load and low Traffic since Sunday

Hello I've noticed a reduction in tor traffic about 50% since Sunday. The cpu load stayed almost same. The amount of TCP Sessions increased from ~34k to ~65k. Also the abuse rated about network scans got increased since Sunday. Does anyone knows what's there going on? My guess is that since

Re: [tor-relays] Measuring the Accuracy of Tor Relays' Advertised Bandwidths

On 7/26/19 4:18 PM, Rob Jansen wrote: > I am planning on performing an experiment on the Tor network to try to gauge > the accuracy of the advertised bandwidths that relays report in their server > descriptors. Hi, does this by any chance caused the lost of the "guard" flag ? Observed here now