Re: [tor-relays] Please help us find a working alternative to using MaxMind's GeoLite2 databases

2020-02-12 Thread teor
Hi, > On 13 Feb 2020, at 03:14, niftybunny > wrote: > > Checking my relays its hard to tell what is correct. As a German IXC I do own > the IPs but the servers are in the Netherlands. If you prefer the ownership > of the IPs Maxmind is correct with Germany, if you prefer where the actual >

Re: [tor-relays] Please help us find a working alternative to using MaxMind's GeoLite2 databases

2020-02-12 Thread niftybunny
Sorry for the reply here. I am in an endless cycle of: Trac thinks your submission might be Spam. To prove otherwise please provide a response to the following. and capture solving does not really work. Checking my relays its hard to tell what is correct. As a German IXC I do own the IPs but

Re: [tor-relays] Please help us find a working alternative to using MaxMind's GeoLite2 databases

2020-02-12 Thread Tim Niemeyer
Hi Karsten For the RIPE Region (the resources from RIPE) the correct source is the RIPE Database. There is an "country" attribute on the inetnum and inetnum6 objects. Last time I checked maxmind, it was completely wrong about 185.220.100.0/22. I reported to them, but didn't get any response.

Re: [tor-relays] Please help us find a working alternative to using MaxMind's GeoLite2 databases

2020-02-12 Thread nusenu
since https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/26585 didn't make any progress since a long time I'm glad to see planed improvements in this area. > I put the remaining 7% on the following wiki page: > > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/MetricsGeoipComparison some of

[tor-relays] Please help us find a working alternative to using MaxMind's GeoLite2 databases

2020-02-12 Thread Karsten Loesing
Hi relay operators, as you might have heard, MaxMind has changed access and use of their GeoLite2 databases: https://blog.maxmind.com/2019/12/18/significant-changes-to-accessing-and-using-geolite2-databases/ This affects Onionoo and tor, and I'm trying to find a working alternative on the

Re: [tor-relays] Bridge on Raspberry Pi Zero

2020-02-12 Thread Santiago R.R.
El 12/02/20 a las 07:02, ylms escribió: > > > On 2/12/20 5:28 AM, skarz wrote: > > 70 Mbps isn’t fast enough for Tor? > > I'd say it is not fast enough for Tor, we did some tests with a > Raspberry Pi4 lately, these can utilize close to 100 MBit/s. 100Mbps used by Tor connections? Or what kind

Re: [tor-relays] Bridge on Raspberry Pi Zero

2020-02-12 Thread John Csuti
Hey, He is referring to the cpu not being fast enough it can’t make all the calculations needed to run TOR fast enough. We are referring to the base clock not your internet speed Thanks, John Csuti > On Feb 11, 2020, at 11:39 PM, skarz wrote: > >  > 70 Mbps isn’t fast enough for Tor? > >

Re: [tor-relays] Bridge on Raspberry Pi Zero

2020-02-12 Thread ylms
On 2/12/20 5:28 AM, skarz wrote: > 70 Mbps isn’t fast enough for Tor? I'd say it is not fast enough for Tor, we did some tests with a Raspberry Pi4 lately, these can utilize close to 100 MBit/s. You could just try it, the Debian repository should provide the correct version for the processor

Re: [tor-relays] Bridge on Raspberry Pi Zero

2020-02-12 Thread Gunnar Wolf
skarz dijo [Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 04:28:05AM +]: > 70 Mbps isn’t fast enough for Tor? If you manage to pass 70Mbps of Tor traffic through your Raspberry Pi Zero... You are definitively better at tweaking it than I am :-] ___ tor-relays mailing list

Re: [tor-relays] 100% CPU load on Windows Server 2019

2020-02-12 Thread TorGate
what say the logfile ? yes youcan allways switch to linux, but you have a interresting setup. > Am 12.02.2020 um 06:46 schrieb Michael Gerstacker > : > > Hi, > > for diversity purposes and curiosity i decided to choose Windows Server 2019 > together with TheOnionPack for my first exit relay.