Re: [tor-relays] Cheap Servers? There MUST be a catch

On Sun, 8 Nov 2020 22:21:00 - "Dr Gerard Bulger" wrote: > Worried about dominance of OVH for relays and exits? How about Google! > Setting up a fast server is SO cheap on their https://cloud.google.com/ > platform, it is tempting to set up relays, if not exits there. Looking at > their T

[tor-relays] A way to reduce spam and brute attacks...

Hello guys, is there any way to stop or if not reduce the spam, brute force attacks that are leaving my exit? Well port blocking or destination IP blocking is one way but without any relevant information except this hard, right? => https://cleantalk.org/blacklists/51.15.80.14 Stopped my exit fo

Re: [tor-relays] Abuse received for middle node (part of the curent problem)

li...@for-privacy.net a écrit : > On 02.11.2020 23:26, Roger Dingledine wrote: > > > See one example that somebody else experienced here: > > https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2020-May/018450.html > > > > Yeah that was me. I changed the ports of the relays in question to 443 and

[tor-relays] Cheap Servers? There MUST be a catch

Worried about dominance of OVH for relays and exits? How about Google! Setting up a fast server is SO cheap on their https://cloud.google.com/ platform, it is tempting to set up relays, if not exits there. Looking at their T&Cs they do not seem to mention TOR or banning running a proxy, but a