Hi,
Am 16.04.2013 um 18:52 schrieb George Kadianakis:
Ubuntu check out these instructiosn:
https://www.torproject.org/projects/obfsproxy-debian-instructions.html.en
I am trying to install obfsproxy on Ubuntu lucid. Sadly, using these apt lines
deb http://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org
Hi,
Am 21.04.2013 um 14:54 schrieb Roman Mamedov:
Did you do apt-get update before trying 'search'?
This is what I do:
$ sudo grep tor /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org lucid main
deb http://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org experimental-lucid main
$ sudo
Andreas Krey:
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:50:48 +, Lunar wrote:
Drake Wilson:
- bypass declared installation requirements, use 2.6.6, and blindly
hope that it won't result in some awful subtle bug;
obfsproxy works on Debian Squeeze which bears 2.6.6. I had to patch the
Mind
On 16.04.2013 22:49, Martin Weinelt wrote:
Does it make sense to launch an Obfsproxy on a IP already running a
relay node?
That is a fine question. Some countries currently seem to block relays
by IP:Port combination, so the rest of the ports could be still
reachable. In theory, it should work
Greetings,
A year ago we asked you to run obfuscated bridges to help people in
Iran [0]. Many people answered our call and we ended up having a big
pool of obfuscated bridges to give to our users.
Unfortunately, today, most of those bridges are down, and fresh ones
are needed more than ever,
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:52:19 +0300
George Kadianakis desnac...@riseup.net wrote:
Also, obfsproxy was rewritten in Python and it now supports a new
pluggable transport called 'obfs3' which works even in China [2]. We
have dropped support for the C-version of Obfsproxy, and the new
Pluggable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16.04.2013 22:37, Moritz Bartl wrote:
On 16.04.2013 22:27, Roman Mamedov wrote:
Also, obfsproxy was rewritten in Python and it now supports a
new pluggable transport called 'obfs3' which works even in
China [2].
I wish this sort of
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:52 PM, George Kadianakis desnac...@riseup.net wrote:
Looking into BridgeDB, we have 200 obfs2 bridges, but only 40 obfs3
bridges: this means that we need more people running the new Python
obfsproxy! Upgrading obfsproxy should be easy now, since we prepared
new
