On 10/27/2016 05:17 PM, Kenneth Freeman wrote:
>
>
> On 10/26/2016 06:58 PM, Nicholas Merrill wrote:
>
>> Hi Kenneth
>>
>> I am with a New York state non-profit organization that runs a number of
>> exits. I am not a lawyer, but I have surely spent years discussing
>> these and other related
On 10/26/2016 06:58 PM, Nicholas Merrill wrote:
> Hi Kenneth
>
> I am with a New York state non-profit organization that runs a number of
> exits. I am not a lawyer, but I have surely spent years discussing
> these and other related issues with many lawyers.
Good to know. Keeps me and my coho
On 10/27/2016 02:18 AM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> On 10/27/2016 02:22 AM, Kenneth Freeman wrote:
>> An Idaho nonprofit has expressed guarded interest in Tor. Ideally I'd
>> like them to run an exit node without fuss or bother, but the Tor
>> Project's Tips on Running an Exit Node only covers limited
On 10/27/2016 02:22 AM, Kenneth Freeman wrote:
> An Idaho nonprofit has expressed guarded interest in Tor. Ideally I'd
> like them to run an exit node without fuss or bother, but the Tor
> Project's Tips on Running an Exit Node only covers limited liability
> corporations (LLCs)
Which guide is th
On 10/26/16 8:22 PM, Kenneth Freeman wrote:
> An Idaho nonprofit has expressed guarded interest in Tor. Ideally I'd
> like them to run an exit node without fuss or bother, but the Tor
> Project's Tips on Running an Exit Node only covers limited liability
> corporations (LLCs) regarding the legal/
An Idaho nonprofit has expressed guarded interest in Tor. Ideally I'd
like them to run an exit node without fuss or bother, but the Tor
Project's Tips on Running an Exit Node only covers limited liability
corporations (LLCs) regarding the legal/corporate set-up. Is there
anything to add, or is that
