Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems

2015-07-07 Thread Carlin Bingham
I just want to chime in with my own consensus weight problem. FF1678164E0FFF1DACA45E3DCDE16E49FF1374BE has been running for over 70 days and still has a consensus of 20, I don't think it has ever changed since it was started. Looking at the consensus it is unmeasured=1 by every authority. Any

Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems

2015-07-07 Thread Speak Freely
Hey Josh, (The following is the only sentence that matters in this email) I was just curious about the statement that it takes a full 2 weeks for the new-relay cap to be aged-out. (The following is only background information in case you were curious, because it's been a hell of a long

Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems

2015-07-07 Thread Tom Ritter
On 7 July 2015 at 09:04, Carlin Bingham c...@viennan.net wrote: I just want to chime in with my own consensus weight problem. FF1678164E0FFF1DACA45E3DCDE16E49FF1374BE has been running for over 70 days and still has a consensus of 20, I don't think it has ever changed since it was started.

Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems

2015-07-06 Thread Speak Freely
Starlight, I created this relay on Friday, shortly after you told me to be patient. https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/41C526E3C1441A3CDE9B605002643B94F3750E8C Uptime: 3 days 23 hours CW: 1100 (yesterday it was at 740) It gained consensus after 48 hours, but you said it would take 2 weeks?

Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems

2015-07-06 Thread josh
Hi Matt, Which relays are you have issues with? Kind Regards, Joshua Lee Tucker @tuckerwales http://tucker.wales On 6 Jul 2015, at 19:41, Speak Freely when2plus2...@riseup.net wrote: Starlight, I created this relay on Friday, shortly after you told me to be patient.

Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems

2015-07-02 Thread Speak Freely
I did as s7r suggested, updated to 0.2.7.1-alpha-dev, and changed fingerprints. And we're still crippled by CW of 20. (Yes, yes, I know. The relay has gone back to stage 1/3 because the fingerprints changed.) Uptime: 48 hours Upload/download : 2.1GB, works out to a blazingly fast speed of

Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems

2015-07-02 Thread starlight . 2015q2
Takes a full two weeks for the new-relay cap to be aged-out. Patience. At 13:33 7/2/2015 +, Speak Freely wrote: I did as s7r suggested, updated to 0.2.7.1-alpha-dev, and changed fingerprints. And we're still crippled by CW of 20. (Yes, yes, I know. The relay has gone back to stage 1/3

Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems

2015-06-29 Thread Aaron Gibson
On 2015-06-29 17:51, Speak Freely wrote: Hello, First of all, I love Tor. I love Tor Browser, and I love running relays. When the problems are solved, I will most likely spin up more relays. I'm leaving my fastest relay running, as a method of checking the status for myself. The rest have

Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems

2015-06-29 Thread Speak Freely
Rah rah rah... Emailed Aaron directly by accident. Here's the email: Hello, First of all, I love Tor. I love Tor Browser, and I love running relays. When the problems are solved, I will most likely spin up more relays. I'm leaving my fastest relay running, as a method of checking the status

Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems

2015-06-27 Thread Aaron Gibson
On 2015-06-19 17:59, Speak Freely wrote: Yeah, I've given up. I won't be renewing most of my relays this month. :( Matt Speak Freely Hi Matt, Sorry that you have had so much trouble with your relays being underutilized. I am now working to fix/refactor Tor's Bandwidth Authority system as

Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems

2015-06-19 Thread Network Operations Center
It has hit me again aswell, consensus dropped from 40,000+ to 20 after serving 100+ mbit daily to the Tor network: 06/12/2015 621.04 GiB | 692.11 GiB |1.28 TiB | 127.49 Mbit/s 06/13/2015 565.29 GiB | 629.45 GiB |1.17 TiB | 116.00 Mbit/s 06/14/2015 649.90 GiB |

Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems

2015-06-19 Thread Speak Freely
Yeah, I've given up. I won't be renewing most of my relays this month. :( Matt Speak Freely ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems

2015-06-12 Thread Tom Ritter
I looked at https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/D60B02A13F5D9CAFD6EC27A5332C5FEF5B769105 / 4FreeSpeech for the latest vote: moria: w Bandwidth=3012 Measured=1890 maatuska: w Bandwidth=3012 Measured=3820 gabelmoo: w Bandwidth=3012 longclaw: w Bandwidth=3012 consensus: w Bandwidth=20

Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems

2015-06-12 Thread Speak Freely
Zero progress on this, so I thought I'd pop it up again. I'm only pointing this out because it's interesting, not because I think anyone will do anything about it. It may be interesting to someone looking into the diversity of consensus weights given a small subset from two providers, that is

Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems

2015-06-09 Thread Speak Freely
Actually I remembered a third relay having problems. On Friday last week my provider asked me to rate limit one of my relays because it was pumping a lot of data. (Unmetered does have its limits, and I fully appreciate how my provider handled it) I changed the RelayBandwidth from 100Mbit to