gus:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 07:49:47PM +0100, nusenu wrote:
gus:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 11:26:07PM +0100, nusenu wrote:
I've got some practical experience with how things are (not) handled
by the Tor Project in this space which discourages involvement.
The past has also shown that proposals
toroperl...@jrobin.ephemeron.org:
On Sun, 2 Apr 2023, nusenu wrote:
I would actually like to hear the torproject's "self-assessment" on this
before I send my opinion on it.
I agree: it would be nice to hear about the current (informal) process,
flawed as it may be, and the Tor Project's
On Sun, 2 Apr 2023, nusenu wrote:
I would actually like to hear the torproject's "self-assessment" on this
before I send my opinion on it.
I agree: it would be nice to hear about the current (informal) process,
flawed as it may be, and the Tor Project's self-assessment of a sample of
past
nusenu:
I've got some practical experience with how things are (not)
handled by the Tor Project in this space which discourages
involvement.
That's unfortunate. What has been the problem with past
proposal-handling? And how should it have been done differently?
I would actually like to hear
I've got some practical experience with how things are (not)
handled by the Tor Project in this space which discourages
involvement.
That's unfortunate. What has been the problem with past
proposal-handling? And how should it have been done differently?
I would actually like to hear the
The sponsor name, DRL (Department of State Bureau of Democracy, Human
Rights, and Labor - US Gov), can be found in the linked milestone
I found it after sending the question but thanks for elaborating.
a few questions:
- Can you describe the process these proposals will undergo after they
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 07:49:47PM +0100, nusenu wrote:
> gus:
> > On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 11:26:07PM +0100, nusenu wrote:
> > > I've got some practical experience with how things are (not) handled
> > > by the Tor Project in this space which discourages involvement.
> > > The past has also shown
gus:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 11:26:07PM +0100, nusenu wrote:
I've got some practical experience with how things are (not) handled
by the Tor Project in this space which discourages involvement.
The past has also shown that proposals in this area are not
handled as tor proposals in the sense of
nusenu:
I've got some practical experience with how things are (not) handled
by the Tor Project in this space which discourages involvement.
That's unfortunate. What has been the problem with past
proposal-handling? And how should it have been done differently?
The past has also shown that
On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 11:26:07PM +0100, nusenu wrote:
> I've got some practical experience with how things are (not) handled
> by the Tor Project in this space which discourages involvement.
> The past has also shown that proposals in this area are not
> handled as tor proposals in the sense of
I've got some practical experience with how things are (not) handled
by the Tor Project in this space which discourages involvement.
The past has also shown that proposals in this area are not
handled as tor proposals in the sense of [1].
We're not in the process of approving any of them.
a
Hello,
We accomplished a number of things in our fight against malicious relays
over the last 2 years[1]. One area we still need to focus on is
strengthening our relay operator community. We're therefore currently
collecting proposals from you or anyone else interested that could help
to impove
12 matches
Mail list logo
