Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

> On 18 Dec 2015, at 02:03, Logforme wrote: > > My relay, Logforme (855BC2DABE24C861CD887DB9B2E950424B49FC34), is not on > the list even though it fits all the criteria, except the HSDir flag > which I lost when I upgraded to the latest version. > Hint, hint, Mr Roger "We should

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

> On 18 Dec 2015, at 23:12, hwertiout...@safe-mail.net wrote: > > Hi. > >> TL;DR: Stable non-exit relays can help tor clients use the Tor >> network. Please opt-in! > > My relay is on the list and I want to opt in! > > eriador 6DE61A6F72C1E5418A66BFED80DFB63E4C77668F Dear hwertiout695, It

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

> On 18 Jan 2016, at 11:07, Roman Mamedov wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:16:40 +1100 > Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote: > >> I think if a client is just using it for bootstrap, any extra latency >> shouldn't be an issue. >> But IPv6 clients may also

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

> On 18 Jan 2016, at 03:05, Thom Wiggers wrote: > > Hi all, > > I would like to opt in for this trail, > > My relay is: > > tornoderdednl CBEFF7BA4A4062045133C053F2D70524D8BBE5BE on 178.62.199.226 / > [2a03:b0c0:2:d0::b7:5001]. > > (Will you also be including IPv6

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

> On 18 Dec 2015, at 04:43, t...@use.startmail.com wrote: > > Not on the list of candidate fallbacks i still offering my family: >

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

> On 18 Dec 2015, at 06:03, starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote: > > Relay 'Binnacle' experienced outages due to a > loose fiber-option junction in the overhead > wires that has been repaired. I believe > it would make the list if not for this > and do not foresee further trouble. > ... >

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

> On 18 Dec 2015, at 04:49, Pascal Terjan wrote: > On 17 December 2015 at 14:07, Nick Mathewson > wrote: > For the initial fallback release, we will only add your relay if you > opt in. Please reply on the tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:16:40 +1100 Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote: > I think if a client is just using it for bootstrap, any extra latency > shouldn't be an issue. > But IPv6 clients may also pick it as a guard, so that should be taken into > account. > > Should we be

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

> On 18 Dec 2015, at 09:23, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote: >> On 18 Dec 2015, at 06:31, ]V[ > > wrote: >> Able! >> > > ... > Thanks, can you let me/us know the names your relay(s)? > (I need to know the names to add them

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

> On 19 Dec 2015, at 05:53, Felix wrote: > ... > I'm happy to bring in the relay Doedel22 > '8FA37B93397015B2BC5A525C908485260BE9F422'. Hi Felix, There are some other relays in that family, did you want to opt-in or opt-out for them? Tim Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

Hi all, I would like to opt in for this trail, My relay is: tornoderdednl CBEFF7BA4A4062045133C053F2D70524D8BBE5BE on 178.62.199.226 / [2a03:b0c0:2:d0::b7:5001]. (Will you also be including IPv6 addresses?) Best regards, Thom On 12/01/16 14:07, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote: > >> On 12 Jan

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

> On 12 Jan 2016, at 23:30, Joost Rijneveld wrote: > > Hi all, > >> On 17 Dec 2015, at 15:07, Nick Mathewson wrote: >> If your relay is on this list, and you expect it to be on the same IP >> address(es) and port for at least 2 years, please consider opting-in >> for

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

Hi all, > On 17 Dec 2015, at 15:07, Nick Mathewson wrote: > If your relay is on this list, and you expect it to be on the same IP > address(es) and port for at least 2 years, please consider opting-in > for this trial. I realise it's been a while since the last post in this thread, but I'd like

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

Found a serious bug in the updateFallbackDirs.py script used to generate the fallback relay candidate list. The OnionOO retrieval used to pull flag history returns the entire history of each relay rather than the 120 days requested. This results in 145 relays left off the list as too-old

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

follow up: Looking at the URL it appears that the selection criteria indicates which records to select NOT the range of history to return. So the having the script filter by MAX_AGE (per the patch) is correct. A quick examination of https://onionoo.torproject.org/protocol.html reveals no

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

> On 12 Jan 2016, at 12:11, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote: > > >> On 12 Jan 2016, at 10:14, starlight.201...@binnacle.cx >> wrote: >> >> Found a serious bug in the >> >> updateFallbackDirs.py >> >> script used to generate the

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

At 14:24 1/12/2016 +1100, you wrote: >I've reviewed this patch and it looks good. >I updated it for the latest version of the script in the tor git repository, >as it was based on an old version. great, thanks! >I've also logged the more general issue with OnionOO and date ranges as #18036.

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

> On 12 Jan 2016, at 10:14, starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote: > > Found a serious bug in the > > updateFallbackDirs.py > > script used to generate the fallback relay > candidate list. The OnionOO retrieval used > to pull flag history returns the entire > history of each relay rather than

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

Hi Nick, On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 at 09:07:16 -0500, Nick Mathewson wrote: > In December 2015, we created a list of ~400 candidate fallbacks. > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/15775/fallback_dirs.inc > > If your relay is on this list, and you expect it to be on the same IP

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

You can add me too: 330CD3DB6AD266DC70CDB512B036957D03D9BC59 TeamTardis Am 17.12.2015 um 15:07 schrieb Nick Mathewson: > TL;DR: Stable non-exit relays can help tor clients use the Tor > network. Please opt-in! > > We want to run a trial of fallback directory mirrors (fallbacks) in > Tor. Tor

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Good to hear the criteria will be reviewed. As far as I am aware there are under-utilised resources on these two exit relays so that is why I am opt-ing in these relays. If there is any more information on the expected resources for the fallback

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

> On 20 Dec 2015, at 02:55, NOC wrote: > > The initial message states that the relays should be non-exit replays. > All these relays are exit relays with enough resources to spare so I > would love to see them added. > ... > > -- > Tim Semeijn Hi Tim, Thanks for

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, The estimated extra load looks good, it shouldn't be a problem. Are we entirely sure we want to hardcode a static weight for each fallback directory relay? I know we require it to be stable enough but sometimes the weight assigned to a relay

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

> On 20 Dec 2015, at 23:42, NOC wrote: > > Signed PGP part > Good to hear the criteria will be reviewed. As far as I am aware there > are under-utilised resources on these two exit relays so that is why I > am opt-ing in these relays. > > If there is any more information

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

> On 21 Dec 2015, at 01:55, s7r wrote: > > Signed PGP part > Hi, > > The estimated extra load looks good, it shouldn't be a problem. > > Are we entirely sure we want to hardcode a static weight for each > fallback directory relay? I know we require it to be stable enough but

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Thanks for the information. The load should be no problem at all, great to hear ;) On 20/12/15 14:37, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote: > >> On 20 Dec 2015, at 23:42, NOC > > wrote: >> >> Signed PGP

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hereby I want to opt-in the following relays which are present on the list: BabylonNetwork02 (fingerprint: 54660C671B47E6986B465B8014BD19E5A34B) BabylonNetwork03 (fingerprint: C79552275DFCD486B942510EF663ED36ACA1A84B) And opt-out the next one

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

I would like to opt-in my relay, which is on the candidate list. pixelminer CE75BF0972ADD52AF8807602374E495C815DB304 ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

Hi. > TL;DR: Stable non-exit relays can help tor clients use the Tor > network. Please opt-in! My relay is on the list and I want to opt in! eriador 6DE61A6F72C1E5418A66BFED80DFB63E4C77668F ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

Feel free to opt-in my relay wagner 5525D0429BFE5DC4F1B0E9DE47A4CFA169661E33 ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

[tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

Hi I'm happy to bring in the relay Doedel22 '8FA37B93397015B2BC5A525C908485260BE9F422'. Best regards, Felix ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

hi, you can took coby "A360C21FA87FFA2046D92C17086A6B47E5C68109" too. ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

Hi there, > On 17 Dec 2015, at 15:07, Nick Mathewson wrote: > In December 2015, we created a list of ~400 candidate fallbacks. > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/15775/fallback_dirs.inc > > If your relay is on this list, and you expect it to be on

[tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

TL;DR: Stable non-exit relays can help tor clients use the Tor network. Please opt-in! We want to run a trial of fallback directory mirrors (fallbacks) in Tor. Tor clients contact fallbacks to download the consensus during initial bootstrap, before they contact the directory authorities.

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

My relay, Logforme (855BC2DABE24C861CD887DB9B2E950424B49FC34), is not on the list even though it fits all the criteria, except the HSDir flag which I lost when I upgraded to the latest version. Hint, hint, Mr Roger "We should somehow teach everybody that losing their flags for a few days is

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

Hi Nick, > On 17.12.2015, at 15:07, Nick Mathewson wrote: > > TL;DR: Stable non-exit relays can help tor clients use the Tor > network. Please opt-in! I’m happy to opt-in my relay Vadelma [0], but it’s not on the original list - running the onionoo query now includes it,

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

Hey there, i'd be happy to join with my relay 'GrmmlLitavis'. Best regards Nurtic-Vibe Am 17. Dezember 2015 15:07:16 MEZ, schrieb Nick Mathewson : >TL;DR: Stable non-exit relays can help tor clients use the Tor >network. Please opt-in! > >We want to run a trial of

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

Howdy, I'm not on the list and wish to opt-in (for future releases I suppose). My relay, 00C4B4731658D3B4987132A3F77100CFCB190D97 , does not fit the criteria because it's an exit node, but my exit node does not experience high load, and averages out at about ~60% capacity by bandwidth and <50%

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

Not on the list of candidate fallbacks i still offering my family: $4B9E2C56FB42B891794FE2CD2FCAD08A320CC3BB,$BEE2317AE127EB681C5AE1551C1EA0630580638A,$F6279A203C1950ACF592322A235647A05BFBCF91,$5BFDECCE9B4A23AE14EC767C5A2C1E10558B00B9   Am Donnerstag, 17. Dezember 2015 15:07 schrieb Nick

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

> we will only add your relay if you opt in. You obviously have my opt-in for my kitten1 (86E78DD3720C78DA8673182EF96C54B162CD660C) relay ! <3, -- Aeris Individual crypto-terrorist group self-radicalized on the digital Internet https://imirhil.fr/ Protect your privacy, encrypt your

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

Able! Op do 17 dec. 2015 20:19 schreef Aeris : > > we will only add your relay if you opt in. > > You obviously have my opt-in for my kitten1 > (86E78DD3720C78DA8673182EF96C54B162CD660C) relay ! > > <3, > -- > Aeris > Individual crypto-terrorist group self-radicalized on

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

I'm happy to have ratchet on there: FA3415659444AE006E7E9E5375E82F29700CFDFD Cheers, Sam. On 17 Dec 2015 7:51 p.m., "Kurt Besig" wrote: > On 12/17/2015 6:07 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote: > > TL;DR: Stable non-exit relays can help tor clients use the Tor > > network. Please

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

On 12/17/2015 6:07 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote: > TL;DR: Stable non-exit relays can help tor clients use the Tor > network. Please opt-in! > > We want to run a trial of fallback directory mirrors (fallbacks) > in Tor. Tor clients contact fallbacks to download the consensus > during initial

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

> On 18 Dec 2015, at 06:31, ]V[ wrote: > > Able! > (Hi, I'm teor, I'll be pulling together the opt-ins and opt-outs for Nick.) Thanks, can you let me/us know the names your relay(s)? (I need to know the names to add them to the opt-in list.) Tim Tim Wilson-Brown

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

> On 18 Dec 2015, at 04:49, Pascal Terjan wrote: > > > > On 17 December 2015 at 14:07, Nick Mathewson > wrote: > For the initial fallback release, we will only add your relay if you > opt in. Please reply on the

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

Hello, I'd also be happy to opt-in: 14419131033443AE6E21DA82B0D307F7CAE42BDB BR On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:17:37 +1100 Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote: > > On 18 Dec 2015, at 04:49, Pascal Terjan wrote: > > > > > > > > On 17 December 2015 at 14:07, Nick

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

Relay 'Binnacle' experienced outages due to a loose fiber-option junction in the overhead wires that has been repaired. I believe it would make the list if not for this and do not foresee further trouble. Has a static IP and another Verizon FiOS relay qualifies, a positive reflection on the