Re: [tor-relays] TOR Relay Activity Reset

on, is there a way I can change this to check the read/write history in megabytes/gigabytes? Thank you. From: to...@protonmail.com Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 9:41 AM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] TOR Relay Activity Reset Dear Keifer, I'm seeing a stable flag

Re: [tor-relays] TOR Relay Activity Reset

Dear Keifer, I'm seeing a stable flag on torland right now: https://onionite.now.sh/node/DB1AF6477BB276B6EA5E72132684096EEE779D30 --torix Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On May 8, 2018 2:34 PM, Keifer Bly wrote:

[tor-relays] TOR Relay Activity Reset

Hello, for some reason the read/write status of my relay at http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail.php?FP=db1af6477bb276b6ea5e72132684096eee779d30 has been reset to nothing (all flat lines) however the relay is still marked as “running” with it’s current uptime of 11 days 20 hours. I’d

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay marked as hibernating?

Hi Nathaniel, Nathaniel Suchy (Lunorian): > The Tor relay > https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/B0BF533DA3BC09DEEB4AF2BEC16FA21063216FE4 > of mine is marked as hibernating however I have not set a bandwidth > limit. Any idea on why this is happening? Your relay seems to be running and

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay marked as hibernating?

Hi, how about adding IPv6 to your relays, from a quick look at where they are hosted all providers support it. Thank you On 4/28/2018 8:31 PM, Nathaniel Suchy (Lunorian) wrote: Hi, The Tor relay https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/B0BF533DA3BC09DEEB4AF2BEC16FA21063216FE4 of mine

[tor-relays] Tor relay marked as hibernating?

Hi, The Tor relay https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/B0BF533DA3BC09DEEB4AF2BEC16FA21063216FE4 of mine is marked as hibernating however I have not set a bandwidth limit. Any idea on why this is happening? Cheers, Nathaniel Suchy signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay software automatic updates

> On 16 Apr 2018, at 04:03, Keifer Bly wrote: > > Ok, do you know how I could configure this to automatically update my tor > software? Thank you. I think you might have missed my reply: > The homebrew update command is: > brew update && brew upgrade > >

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay software automatic updates

Ok, do you know how I could configure this to automatically update my tor software? Thank you. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 15, 2018, at 2:29 AM, Vasilis wrote: > > Hi, > > Keifer Bly: >> I am running my tor relay “torland” on Mac OS X via this guide here >>

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay software automatic updates

> On 15 Apr 2018, at 19:29, Vasilis wrote: > > Hi, > > Keifer Bly: >> I am running my tor relay “torland” on Mac OS X via this guide here >> https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-doc-osx.html.en >> >> I am wondering, is there a way to configure the tor relaying software to

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay software automatic updates

Hi, Keifer Bly: > I am running my tor relay “torland” on Mac OS X via this guide here > https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-doc-osx.html.en > > I am wondering, is there a way to configure the tor relaying software to > automatically check for software updates and install them automatically if

[tor-relays] Tor relay software automatic updates

Hello I am running my tor relay “torland” on Mac OS X via this guide here https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-doc-osx.html.en I am wondering, is there a way to configure the tor relaying software to automatically check for software updates and install them automatically if there are any?

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay Stable Flag

> On 12 Apr 2018, at 10:12, Keifer Bly wrote: > > Thank you. What exactly does the stable flag do? I know what it means, the > relay has been online for the last few days without significant interruption, > which is why I lost it as I had the stable flag, I had had it

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay Stable Flag

of megabytes at a time, I thought only stable relays received bigger amounts of traffic. Thank you very much. From: teor Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 3:34 PM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay Stable Flag On 12 Apr 2018, at 01:33, Keifer Bly <kei

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay Stable Flag

: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 4:30 AM > To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay Stable Flag > > > > On 11 Apr 2018, at 20:54, Gary <jaffacakemonste...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello. > > Relay Search is about can be about 3

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay Stable Flag

Is there a way I can find out what the current weighted mbtf is? Thank you. From: teor Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 4:30 AM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay Stable Flag On 11 Apr 2018, at 20:54, Gary <jaffacakemonste...@gmail.com> wrote: Hello.

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay Stable Flag

> On 11 Apr 2018, at 20:54, Gary wrote: > > Hello. > > Relay Search is about can be about 3 hours behind. > >> On 11 April 2018 at 08:46, Keifer Bly wrote: >> I am also wondering, does how long a relay is offline for after loosing the >>

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay Stable Flag

Hello. Relay Search is about can be about 3 hours behind. On 11 April 2018 at 08:46, Keifer Bly wrote: > I am also wondering, does how long a relay is offline for after loosing > the stable flag effect how long it takes for the relay to regain it’s > stable flag? > I

[tor-relays] Tor Relay Stable Flag

Hello, for a while now, I have been running a relay called torland at http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail.php?FP=db1af6477bb276b6ea5e72132684096eee779d30 I am a little bit bummed right now. After working on it for the past week, I finally had the stable flag, however, unannounced my

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay Setup

You're currently not measured, per atlas it's been only 12 hours since this node has been online. It takes about three days to get a nominal measurement. I had a node on a 200mbps connection sit at 0bps for two days straight, then it finally had some movement in the evening of day three. I

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay Setup

https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/53CDD268FAD52B0236A4E7F4784259A41C6E3414 ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On 24 February 2018 5:59 PM, s7r wrote: > Gabe D. wrote: > > > Feb 24 10:45:08.668 \[notice\] Tor 0.3.2.9 (git-64a719dd25a21acb) running > > on Linux

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay Setup

Ok, so you’re going to censor your IP address even though it’s getting broadcasted worldwide through not only the atlas search engine, but the Tor network itself. If you run a relay, expect to have your IP address broadcasted. In addition, if you run a relay, expect that that some way to

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay Setup

Feb 24 10:45:08.668 [notice] Tor 0.3.2.9 (git-64a719dd25a21acb) running on Linux with Libevent 2.0.19-stable, OpenSSL 1.0.1t, Zlib 1.2.7, Liblzma N/A, and Libzstd N/A. Feb 24 10:45:08.668 [notice] Tor can't help you if you use it wrong! Learn how

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay Setup

Hi, Am 24. Februar 2018 18:24:07 schrieb "Gabe D." : Hey Guys, Ive an issue... I wanted to aid the network and setup a tor exit node, however its failing to do so, everything looks perfect config wise and it says "publishing server descriptor" no errors but the node

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay Setup

> On 25 Feb 2018, at 04:23, Gabe D. wrote: > > Hey Guys, > Ive an issue... I wanted to aid the network and setup a tor exit node, > however its failing to do so, everything looks perfect config wise and it > says "publishing server descriptor" no errors but the node

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay Setup

On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:23:34PM -0500, Gabe D. wrote: > Ive an issue... I wanted to aid the network and setup a tor exit node, > however its failing to do so, everything looks perfect config wise and it > says "publishing server descriptor" no errors but the node never shows up in > tor

[tor-relays] Tor Relay Setup

Hey Guys, Ive an issue... I wanted to aid the network and setup a tor exit node, however its failing to do so, everything looks perfect config wise and it says "publishing server descriptor" no errors but the node never shows up in tor atlas, is there something i may be doing wrong? This is my

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay making normal internet unusable

On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 01:12:31 -0400 Roger Dingledine wrote: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:53:39PM +0930, W Howard wrote: > > Thanks for the information. I wanted to run a relay from home to > >support the project but I may instead contribute financially. > > You could do both! :)

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay making normal internet unusable

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:53:39PM +0930, W Howard wrote: > Thanks for the information. I wanted to run a relay from home to >support the project but I may instead contribute financially. You could do both! :) That is, run a non-exit relay from home, and also donate.

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay making normal internet unusable

Dear Roger, Thanks for the information. I wanted to run a relay from home to support the project but I may instead contribute financially. One of the up sides of a tor exit relay is the false traffic generated. Our meta data is now collected and I like the idea of filling it with junk traffic.

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay making normal internet unusable

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:33:26AM +0930, W Howard wrote: > I have some spare bandwidth and want to run an exit relay Is this at your home? Careful running exit relays at your home -- there is always some new cop who just started his job, doesn't understand the Internet, has never heard of Tor,

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay making normal internet unusable

RelayBandwidthRate 10 MB # limit for the bandwidth we'll use to relay RelayBandwidthBurst 10 MB # maximum rate when relaying bursts of traffic is your friend. Copy & paste it in your torrc file.Perhaps you should modify the MB/sec rate too :) niftybunny “For too long, we have been a

[tor-relays] Tor relay making normal internet unusable

Dear Group, I have some spare bandwidth and want to run an exit relay buy when I do the normal internet is so slow and I have to fill out so many captcha that it makes it unusable! Any ideas why? I think google etc block by default tor exit nodes. I was thinking about spinning up a vm and

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay operators at SHA2017

sorry, didn't received Alexander Dietrich's mail. I deleted the page. Today 21:00 is better. C.f https://wiki.sha2017.org/w/Session:Tor_Relay_Operators_Meetup Schroedinger: > Hi, > > sorry for the late response. > > I'll try to organize the Pi tent for tonight 23:40. If I can't, let's > meet

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay operators at SHA2017 ?

There is a self-organized session now: https://wiki.sha2017.org/w/Session:Tor_Relay_Operators_Meetup Cheers, Alexander Sent from my toasterOn Aug 5, 2017 5:46 PM, Alexander Færøy wrote: > > On 1 August 2017 at 21:24, Schroedinger wrote: > > if

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay operators at SHA2017

Hi, sorry for the late response. I'll try to organize the Pi tent for tonight 23:40. If I can't, let's meet infront and move somewhere else. https://wiki.sha2017.org/w/Session:Tor_Relay_Operators_Meeting Schroedinger: > Hi relay operators, > > if anyone at SHA2017 is interested in meeting

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay operators at SHA2017 ?

On 1 August 2017 at 21:24, Schroedinger wrote: > if anyone at SHA2017 is interested in meeting up, perhaps we could set > up a self-organized session for Tor relay operators. I'm here as well. I'll happily meet and talk about Tor! Cheers, Alex. -- Alexander Færøy

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay operators at SHA2017 ?

Ditto! Op 1 aug. 2017 10:46 p.m. schreef "Andy Isaacson" : > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 07:24:00PM +, Schroedinger wrote: > >> Hi relay operators, >> >> if anyone at SHA2017 is interested in meeting up, perhaps we could set >> up a self-organized session for Tor relay

[tor-relays] Tor relay operators at SHA2017 ?

Hi relay operators, if anyone at SHA2017 is interested in meeting up, perhaps we could set up a self-organized session for Tor relay operators. ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay operators at DEF CON

Was good to meet people. Thanks for the conversation. On 2017-07-29 12:34 AM, John Ricketts wrote: > Yeah, I'm down. > > On Jul 28, 2017, at 19:51, Robert Keizer > wrote: > >> I could do that. >> >> On Jul 28, 2017 7:11 PM, "Joel Cretan"

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay operators at DEF CON

Running late. Will be over asap. Cheesecake factory is slow. On Jul 28, 2017 10:41 PM, "John Ricketts" wrote: > Yeah, I'm down. > > On Jul 28, 2017, at 19:51, Robert Keizer wrote: > > I could do that. > On Jul 28, 2017 7:11 PM, "Joel Cretan"

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay operators at DEF CON

Yeah, I'm down. On Jul 28, 2017, at 19:51, Robert Keizer > wrote: I could do that. On Jul 28, 2017 7:11 PM, "Joel Cretan" > wrote: Lunchcon took precedence over hallway-with-Roger-con today, but I suggest

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay operators at DEF CON

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 03:01:48PM -0700, Joel Cretan wrote: > If anyone at DEF CON is interested in meeting up, perhaps we could set up a > meeting time, maybe in/around the Crypto and Privacy Village. Of course > we're all interested in anonymity, so no pressure to speak up. But if > enough

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay operators at DEF CON

I'm interested :-) > On Jul 27, 2017, at 14:55, Joel Cretan wrote: > > Hi relay operators, > > If anyone at DEF CON is interested in meeting up, perhaps we could set up a > meeting time, maybe in/around the Crypto and Privacy Village. Of course we're > all interested in

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay dying in FreeBSD

unlimited... From: tor-relays <tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org> on behalf of Alexander Nasonov <al...@yandex.ru> Sent: 13 July 2017 00:46 To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay dying in FreeBSD Farid

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay dying in FreeBSD

Farid Joubbi wrote: > Jul 12 23:44:24.672 [warn] You appear to lack permissions to change memory > limits. Are you root? > Jul 12 23:44:24.672 [warn] Unable to raise RLIMIT_MEMLOCK: Operation not > permitted Read about login classes. Starting points: man login.conf man cap_mkdb man chfn --

[tor-relays] Tor relay dying in FreeBSD

Hello, I just installed a new relay in a fresh FreeBSD installation. The relay starts fine, except for a warning that I don't understand. Then it dies all of a sudden. The time before it dies is different every time. I have googled for the warnings but could not find anything. Does anyone

[tor-relays] Tor relay

Tor relay ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay On Pfsense 2.3.3-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)

> Note that the current pfSense 2.3.3 is based on FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE, > when it probably makes more sense to run a fresh relay on the 11.x branch. > > Instead of expending effort on getting Tor running on pfSense, I'd > recommend just running a FreeBSD relay with the sole purpose of being a >

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay On Pfsense 2.3.3-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)

Tyler Johnson: > On 3/28/17, Edwin Garzón wrote: >> Hi all. >> Need you help, >> I have pfsense *2.3.3-RELEASE-p1* (amd64) and > pkg install tor: >> pkg: No packages available to install matching 'tor' have been found in the >> repositories >> >> I want to install a Tor

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay On Pfsense 2.3.3-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)

On 3/28/17, Edwin Garzón wrote: > Hi all. > Need you help, > I have pfsense *2.3.3-RELEASE-p1* (amd64) and > pkg install tor: > pkg: No packages available to install matching 'tor' have been found in the > repositories > > I want to install a Tor relay > > Thank > A

[tor-relays] Tor Relay On Pfsense 2.3.3-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)

Hi all. Need you help, I have pfsense *2.3.3-RELEASE-p1* (amd64) and > pkg install tor: pkg: No packages available to install matching 'tor' have been found in the repositories I want to install a Tor relay Thank ___ tor-relays mailing list

Re: [tor-relays] TOR Relay performance issue

Hello of course I read the documentation before asking, I do not want to make useless noise on this channel. I'll try Roman's solution! On 01/07/2017 08:30 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: > On 01/07/2017 08:00 PM, Efthimis Iosifdis wrote: > >> You may also have a look at this article if it helps and

Re: [tor-relays] TOR Relay performance issue

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/07/2017 08:00 PM, Efthimis Iosifdis wrote: > > You may also have a look at this article if it helps and in case this is > a new Tor Relay node: > > https://blog.torproject.org/blog/lifecycle-of-a-new-relay /me wonders if this link should be

Re: [tor-relays] TOR Relay performance issue

On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 16:55:12 +0100 Thomas Maurice wrote: > It is supposed to be caped at 20MBps, and 25MBps burst so I doubt the > limitation I am observing is enforced by the node itself. You mean traffic limitation in torrc? Remove it. There is no reason to apply bandwidth

[tor-relays] TOR Relay performance issue

Hello all ! o/ It seems I am running into a performance issue with my relay, and I am not able to troubleshoot it, so I hope someone could point out something obvious I am missing! (for information, the relay is a 2vCPU, 2G RAM VM running on Scaleway) From what I observe from the graphs, my

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay on ARM server Marvell Armada 370/XP

Am 20.12.2016 um 14:40 schrieb Volker Mink: > Is it OK with their TOS to run a TOR Relay7Exit? > If so, i really consider getting a VPS there! Volker - apart from not putting all eggs in the same basket (France as country and Online.net as ISP), but if you really wanna go there scaleway

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay on ARM server Marvell Armada 370/XP

Whoops, wrong one :/ https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/24E91955D969AEA1D80413C64FE106FAE7FD2EA9 > On 20 Dec 2016, at 18:28, Roman Mamedov wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 18:19:06 +0100 > niftybunny wrote: > >> Yes, running 12 exits there.

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay on ARM server Marvell Armada 370/XP

On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 18:19:06 +0100 niftybunny wrote: > Yes, running 12 exits there. > > https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/28F4F392F8F19E3FBDE09616D9DB8143A1E2DDD3 > > > > the

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay on ARM server Marvell Armada 370/XP

in my experience long time ago … arm suxx. I would switch to the 2 core atom, they suck too but no so bad as the arm there. Markus > On 20 Dec 2016, at 14:24, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) - lists > wrote: > > Hello, > > i'm experimenting Tor setup on very cheap servers

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay on ARM server Marvell Armada 370/XP

t; <li...@infosecurity.ch> > An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > Betreff: [tor-relays] Tor Relay on ARM server Marvell Armada 370/XP > Hello, > > i'm experimenting Tor setup on very cheap servers from scaleaway.com > that run a quad-core ARM Marvell Armada 370/XP servers but have > u

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay on ARM server Marvell Armada 370/XP

On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:24:47 +0100 "Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) - lists" wrote: > Hello, > > i'm experimenting Tor setup on very cheap servers from scaleaway.com > that run a quad-core ARM Marvell Armada 370/XP servers but have > unlimited bandwidth. > > Those are Soc

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay on ARM server Marvell Armada 370/XP

Is it OK with their TOS to run a TOR Relay7Exit? If so, i really consider getting a VPS there!   Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Dezember 2016 um 14:24 Uhr Von: "Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) - lists" <li...@infosecurity.ch> An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: [tor-relays] Tor Rel

[tor-relays] Tor Relay on ARM server Marvell Armada 370/XP

Hello, i'm experimenting Tor setup on very cheap servers from scaleaway.com that run a quad-core ARM Marvell Armada 370/XP servers but have unlimited bandwidth. Those are Soc platform: http://natisbad.org/NAS2/refs/Marvell_ARMADA_370_SoC.pdf I saw no information on torproject mailing list about

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

Hi J. I know. But I need a fan on top of the sinks. Just the heat sinks are not efficient enough.  Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Rana <ranaventu...@gmail.com> Datum: 15.12.16 11:19 (GMT+01:00) An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] Tor

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

+01:00) An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment? Well I do suggest that you get a set of Pi heat sinks on ebay for $0.70 (including postage from China, adhesive and sinks for all 3 chips on the Pi). And if you are as extravagant as

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

to step on it accidentally :) From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of balbea16 Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 10:24 AM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment? You are totally right

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

 (without running arm). I don't cool it. Mike Von meinem Samsung Gerät gesendet. Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Rana <ranaventu...@gmail.com> Datum: 15.12.16 08:53 (GMT+01:00) An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

to 3000 connections on another computer is probably a big waste of money. Comments welcome. From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of balbea16 Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 9:04 AM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

+01:00) An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment? ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

Pls. refer to may answers after each of your questions. Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Rana <ranaventu...@gmail.com> Datum: 15.12.16 07:44 (GMT+01:00) An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

>Hi There >This is a pretty interesting topic. I have been running a Rasp Pi 3 based >relay since August this year. By now, I am up to about 1,300 incomming and >outgoing connections, and a max of >about 21mbps. This is about 50% of the >max. upload speed. Consensus weight is between 3,000 and

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

> One of these shiny pretty Netgear R7900? Shiny and dangerous: https://www.wired.com/2016/12/ton-popular-netgear-routers-exposed-no-easy-fix/ Exploiting is as easy as http://www.routerlogin.net/cgi-bin/;echo$IFS'Vulnerable' signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

Hi ThereThis is a pretty interesting topic. I have been running a Rasp Pi 3 based relay since August this year. By now, I am up to about 1,300 incomming and outgoing connections, and a max of about 21mbps. This is about 50% of the max. upload speed. Consensus weight is between 3,000 and

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

On 14 Dec 2016 14:49, "Rana" <ranaventu...@gmail.com> wrote: -Original Message- From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of Sebastian Niehaus Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 2:43 PM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re:

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

-Original Message- From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of Sebastian Niehaus Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 2:43 PM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment? Am 14.12.2016 um 11:46

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

Am 14.12.2016 um 11:46 schrieb Rana: > They do, however, have different numbers as to how much traffic they can > carry; which in view of the above IMHO can be attributed only to the > difference in how well their respective IPSs connect with the ISPs in places > where DirAuths are located.

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

On 14 December 2016 at 11:42, Andreas Krey wrote: > On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 21:43:28 +, teor wrote: > ... > > The bwauth calculations do take latency into account, and they should: > > if CPU usage or bandwidth are near their limit, the latency through the > > relay will be high.

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

> On 14 Dec. 2016, at 22:42, Andreas Krey wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 21:43:28 +, teor wrote: > ... >> The bwauth calculations do take latency into account, and they should: >> if CPU usage or bandwidth are near their limit, the latency through the >> relay will be high. >

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 21:43:28 +, teor wrote: ... > The bwauth calculations do take latency into account, and they should: > if CPU usage or bandwidth are near their limit, the latency through the > relay will be high. I stand corrected. I observed my relays (a few years ago) to often run into

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:46:58 +, Rana wrote: >... > I beg to differ. My experiment with two identical Pies in the same country > showed that the alleged volume that the relay can carry IS dependent on how > well it is connected to the specific DirAuths (which represent "particular > places

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

>Since the consensus weight is the low-median of 5 measurements spread around >the US and Western Europe, being in Germany only gets you one good >measurement: you need 3 good measurements >to get a high consensus weight. > >From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Median : > > Because of this, the

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

> On 14 Dec. 2016, at 21:46, Rana wrote: > > I did see a report from someone boasting the large bandwidth via Pi at home - > but this seems to be an exception rather than a rule, and he was in Germany, > probably at a cozy digital distance from the local DirAuth :)

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

>> A. The fact that the Authorities are located in West Europe and North >> America does not mean that the USERS are there. >The question is what volume a relay can carry, and not how well it is >connected to a particular place in the world. I beg to differ. My experiment with two identical

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

> > On 14 Dec. 2016, at 19:47, Rana wrote: > > Why, while GG2's speed as MEASURED by tor and reported in atlas is 153.6 > kbytes/sec, its actual bandwidth utilization is about 0.3 kbytes/sec (=0.2% > of its capability) is still beyond me, and resolving this by further

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 10:47:12 +, Rana wrote: > I want to reiterate my opinion that Tor network is "mistreating" home-based > relays without good reason: I was just about to jump in and state that it is similar with lower-bandwidth regular relays, but I checked. I have two relays, one

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

-Original Message- >From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of >teor > Your relay's observed bandwidth is >ZG0: 81.35 KByte/s >GG2: 170.79 KByte/s > > (hover over the > bandwidth heading in atlas for these details), so its consensus weight > will be

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

> On 14 Dec. 2016, at 06:01, Rana wrote: > > After 9 days of running a relay with a stable IP address (with “Stable” flag > during the last 4 days) and consensus bw steadily oscillating around 20 > despite the 100 Kbyte/s bandwidth measured by Tor and 200 Kbyte/s

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

-Original Message- From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf Of Sebastian Niehaus Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 9:07 PM To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment? Am 13.12.2016 um 20:01

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

Am 13.12.2016 um 20:01 schrieb Rana: > Any other advice / ideas welcome. You have been asked for fingerpring or atlas link several times. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-relays mailing list

[tor-relays] Tor relay from home - end of experiment?

After 9 days of running a relay with a stable IP address (with "Stable" flag during the last 4 days) and consensus bw steadily oscillating around 20 despite the 100 Kbyte/s bandwidth measured by Tor and 200 Kbyte/s bandwidth measured on the Internet connection, I guess it is time to quit. My relay

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay questions

Hi Thanks for the replies - stack exchange is very useful! Cheers Snap > On 23 Nov 2016, at 19:58, Matthias Fetzer wrote: > > Hi, > >> On 11/23/2016 07:16 PM, Sec INT wrote: >> - for server monitoring Im using nagios but it is very difficult to set this >> up to monitor

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay questions

Hi, On 11/23/2016 07:16 PM, Sec INT wrote: > - for server monitoring Im using nagios but it is very difficult to set this > up to monitor bandwidth use does anyone know of a tool to do this? (Im using > webmin to record bandwidth use but it doesnt have any alerting on it) I am using Munin to

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay questions

i suggest using prometheus for your tor relay stats monitoring because it can easily monitor your bandwidth and any other useful metrics that you like... and it can also render pretty graphs. https://prometheus.io/ On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 06:16:05PM +, Sec INT wrote: > > Hi > > Ive been

[tor-relays] Tor relay questions

Hi Ive been running a relay as a test for a broader rollout including an exit but Im not sure of a few things and am finding it difficult to get further information so here goes - my relay is running at the moment but on atlas it has a line through the uptime? Is this something with

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay balks with "router_pick_published_address(): Success: chose address x.x.x.x"

>> On 9 Nov. 2016, at 09:00, Tobias Sachs wrote: >> >> Hey, >> >> my Tor relay >> https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/B567E8E39641F61091C1F2CAAAF73D3D1BF9CFE1 >> balks with the following message which is repeated in the log with the >> "info" logging level up to 23251

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay balks with "router_pick_published_address(): Success: chose address x.x.x.x"

This doesn't help you solve your problem, but it's relevant. I run Tor network simulations and see this all the time. I haven't taken the time to look into it, and always have assumed it's just a minor misconfiguration in the simulator or something that only exists _because_ it's a simulation.

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay balks with "router_pick_published_address(): Success: chose address x.x.x.x"

> On 9 Nov. 2016, at 09:00, Tobias Sachs wrote: > > Hey, > > my Tor relay > https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/B567E8E39641F61091C1F2CAAAF73D3D1BF9CFE1 > balks with the following message which is repeated in the log with the > "info" logging level up to 23251 times at

[tor-relays] Tor relay balks with "router_pick_published_address(): Success: chose address x.x.x.x"

Hey, my Tor relay https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/B567E8E39641F61091C1F2CAAAF73D3D1BF9CFE1 balks with the following message which is repeated in the log with the "info" logging level up to 23251 times at the exact same millisecond. The relay responds at :9030/tor/server/authority with a 503

[tor-relays] Tor Relay Operators Meetup at hack.lu - 19.10. 16:00

Hi We are present at this years hack.lu together with a booth with the Chaos Computer Club Luxembourg. Should you guys happen to be around just come by and talk to us. ( We do have Mate, Mate Schnapps and Flora Power :P ) Tor Relay Operators Meet-Up Where: FVDE & C3L booth at the main hall

Re: [tor-relays] tor relay and syslog logging

On Fri, 07 Oct 2016 09:46:54 +0200 "Dr. Who" wrote: > What facility is used by tor when logging to syslog? I didn't find that > information. It looks like the default is 'daemon', as you expected. It is changeable via a ./configure option, but debian doesn't seem to touch it. > System is a

<    1   2   3   4   >