I've updated the previous detailed Linux instructions in the Wiki to include a
section that describes how to tweak the TBB with Obfsproxy to run as an
Obfuscated Tor Bridge. As a result,I removed the instructions on installing
Linux via Wubi.
I was planning on adding a section for OS X as well
>From the FAQ
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorFAQ#YoushouldusesteganographytohideTortraffic.
"First, in the current network topology, the Tor relays list is public and
can be accessed by attackers. An attacker who wants to detect or block
anonymous users could always just notic
> On 02/21/2012 06:48 PM, Andreas Krey wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:26:06 +, Daniel .koolfy Faucon wrote:
>> ...
>>> Checking the software's signatures should ensure that you are not
>>> bootstrapping from harcoded malicious fake nodes or looking at the
>>> wrong
>>> nodes list, and obfspro
On 2/21/2012 4:58 PM, Greg Kalitnikoff wrote:
Check this out
http://privatelee.com/
Thanks. Will have a look.
Tor-talk list administrators: Though this isn't church or a bible
study, there's really no reason for a list subscriber to berate other
subscribers & basically spam the list by pos
Dear Tor community,
We'd like to encourage contribution from the larger Tor community and
help to get 0.2.3.x out as a proper Tor release. Often development
blocks on a few people and at todays Seattle developer meeting, we've
identified that we could use some help!
First up - please consider sub
Check this out
http://privatelee.com/
--
Greg
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
On 21/02/12 22:33, Mr Dash Four wrote:
>> Because you wont be taken seriously by anyone otherwise.
>>
> Eh?! Why do you think I care what you, or anybody, thinks? You and your
> "low-key" friend are an irrelevance - I know what I saw when I accessed
> those two sites earlier today and nothing
On 02/21/2012 06:48 PM, Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:26:06 +, Daniel .koolfy Faucon wrote:
> ...
>> Checking the software's signatures should ensure that you are not
>> bootstrapping from harcoded malicious fake nodes or looking at the wrong
>> nodes list, and obfsproxy makes s
Mr Dash Four is one of those people who write their letters in all caps
using large fonts because they don't really want to hear what we are
saying. Like a two year old, he wants his food handed to him on a
silver platter.
Yeah, as if! You don't really know me, smartarse!
__
--- On Tue, 2/21/12, Mr Dash Four wrote:
> Really?! And who the hell do you think you are, exactly?!
> Please enlighten me, and explain why should I provide you
> with *any* additional "evidence" at all?
Due to the way in which you've been acting, you are no more trustworthy than a
fly-by-nig
On 21/02/12 21:59, Mr Dash Four wrote:
>> I have no reason to believe that you're actually
>> seeing that warning unless you provide some evidence.
>>
> Really?! And who the hell do you think you are, exactly?!
Someone who values evidence over ranting.
> Please
> enlighten me, and explain wh
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, tagnaq wrote:
> > Weasel doesn't have an arm machine to do the builds on, so we don't
> > have those packages on deb.tpo. Sorry
>
> Would you consider building packages for arm if I would donate an arm
> device?
If we had an armel/armhf box that runs Debian natively I could
I'd rather figure out exactly what ixquick.com and startpage.com are doing. Is
it really so difficult for you to provide us with the names of the browser
plugins you used at the time?
Do you think I have the word "GOOFY" written across my forehead by any
chance?
Because you wont be taken seriously by anyone otherwise.
Eh?! Why do you think I care what you, or anybody, thinks? You and your
"low-key" friend are an irrelevance - I know what I saw when I accessed
those two sites earlier today and nothing will compel me to access them
ever again, or us
> I never met someone from the YaCy project.
>
> and they are reallynice people.
Yeah, I heard those yacy guys are serial killin, drug dealin,
baby rapin, church burnin, terrorists. Better not use yacy.
Johnny's mom's is really nice, she can't code for shit though.
On to more useful comparison...
On 2/21/2012 2:05 PM, Low-Key² wrote:
>
>
> --- On Tue, 2/21/12, Mr Dash Four wrote:
>
>> Ask yourself this - why is a search engine site so much
>> interested in my own privacy settings? And why is it that
>> I've never had any such "privacy-oriented" issues with
>> scroogle, ever! if you are
Il 21 febbraio 2012 15:41, Jaromil ha scritto:
>
> re all,
>
> what is the difference between DNSCrypt and a simple compination of
> ssh and socat? something like:
>
> Iclient$ ssh -L 5353:127.0.0.1:5353 server
> Iserver$ socat tcp4-listen:5353,reuseaddr,fork UDP:dns.server:53
> Iclient# socat
I have no reason to believe that you're actually
seeing that warning unless you provide some evidence.
Really?! And who the hell do you think you are, exactly?! Please
enlighten me, and explain why should I provide you with *any* additional
"evidence" at all?
Until I have read your "recom
From: "Jim"
| scroogle.org no longer resolves
http://www.betabeat.com/2012/02/21/scroogle-privacy-first-search-engine-shuts-down-for-good
http://seoonlinesource.wordpress.com/2012/02/20/scroogle-is-gone/
"Scroogle, the search engine operated by privacy militant and self-appointed
Wikipedia
On 21/02/12 19:49, Mr Dash Four wrote:
>> A lot of sites are incredibly "broken" if javascript is disabled. NoScript
>> would be one example of a "privacy plugin" that would thus cause a problem
>> if enabled for some sites. It's why I'm curious as to what the plugin was
>> that you were usin
A lot of sites are incredibly "broken" if javascript is disabled. NoScript would be one example of a "privacy plugin" that would thus cause a problem if enabled for some sites. It's why I'm curious as to what the plugin was that you were using. I haven't been using ixquick for very long, and s
--- On Tue, 2/21/12, Mr Dash Four wrote:
> To put it simply - I am not at all interested in any of
> that.
>
> If a search-engine site is there to present search results,
> the last thing on their mind would be what privacy settings
> I have on my browser or what "privacy-oriented extensions"
--- On Tue, 2/21/12, Mr Dash Four wrote:
> Ask yourself this - why is a search engine site so much
> interested in my own privacy settings? And why is it that
> I've never had any such "privacy-oriented" issues with
> scroogle, ever! if you are able to address/answer those two,
> then you are i
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 04:15:37PM +0800, Koh Choon Lin wrote:
> I would like to ask for members of this list about the following statement:
>
> "The authorities in Singapore are understood to have the ability to
> track down a person online even if he or she uses anonymizing
> facilities such as
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:33 AM, Low-Key² wrote:
> Does anyone know if such a bundle exists or if there are plans to make one?
> The reason I ask is because I know a number of people who would be down to
> run an Obfuscated Tor Bridge, but are a bit wary of installing Linux as
> they've either
I guess I'm just a bit confused, as I've not run into any issues or warnings with
ixquick.com yet. Were you able to determine what the possibly "problematic"
plugin was?
To put it simply - I am not at all interested in any of that.
If a search-engine site is there to present search resul
Again, the msg you are seeing may not accurately describe the problem.
It does to me! A search engine is interested in my browser privacy
settings and whether I use "privacy-oriented browser extensions". It
goes on to "advice" me to turn OFF my "privacy-oriented browser
extensions" in order t
If there are multiple servers hosting a hidden service using the same private
key and URL, the one that has announced most recently gets the requests. During
transitions, there's apparently some network segmentation. At times, different
clients can be simultaneously hitting different hosts. But
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
> I suspect tagnaq meant arm, the architecture here - note how he
> asked for tor 0.2.3.x packages.
Yes, I meant the architecture arm.
> Weasel doesn't have an arm machine to do the builds on, so we don't
> have those packages on deb.tpo. Sorry
Wo
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Martin Hubbard wrote:
> If there are multiple servers hosting a hidden service using the same
> private key and URL, the one that has announced most recently gets the
> requests. During transitions, there's apparently some network segmentation.
> At times, differen
--- On Tue, 2/21/12, Mr Dash Four wrote:
> See my previous posts on the subject.
I guess I'm just a bit confused, as I've not run into any issues or warnings
with ixquick.com yet. Were you able to determine what the possibly
"problematic" plugin was?
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:09:56PM +0100, miniBill wrote:
> Paranoid mode: on
> They intercept the initial bootstrapping and make you connect
> to a "fake" tor network composed of malicious nodes only.
> Is it feasible?
Not feasible (assuming you're using Tor correctly).
https://www.torproject.or
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:26:06 +, Daniel .koolfy Faucon wrote:
...
> Checking the software's signatures should ensure that you are not
> bootstrapping from harcoded malicious fake nodes or looking at the wrong
> nodes list, and obfsproxy makes sure there is no recognizable handshake
> pattern.
It is not a perfect solution, but something with roughly the same model
as Scroogle (and Google search results): Moxie's GoogleSharing addon.
On 21.02.2012 08:25, Jim wrote:
> scroogle.org no longer resolves
> ___
> tor-talk mailing list
> tor-talk@lists
Scroogle, is/was the best out there - by a mile! Nothing even comes close,
unfortunately!
What about ixquick.com?
See my previous posts on the subject.
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-
Well, seeks does works fine with SSL, that's how my node is working.
Yeah, using some mickey-mouse self-signed certificate - you can't be
serious!
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailma
On 2/21/2012 9:41 AM, Mr Dash Four wrote:
Would be interesting to find out which particular aspect of your
configuration
is leading to that error message.
That is not the issue - the fact that startpage is snooping to see
whether I use "privacy-oriented browser extension" should be
good-enou
On 21.02.2012 17:30, Mr Dash Four wrote:
>> Well, seeks does works fine with SSL, that's how my node is working.
> Yeah, using some mickey-mouse self-signed certificate - you can't be
> serious!
I think you got the wrong idea. Seeks is not a simple "replacement
search engine" with a central search
On 21.02.2012 12:09, miniBill wrote:
> Paranoid mode: on
> They intercept the initial bootstrapping and make you connect
> to a "fake" tor network composed of malicious nodes only.
> Is it feasible?
If you have a genuine binary, it contains the keys of the directory
authorities and thus it cannot
--- On Tue, 2/21/12, Mr Dash Four wrote:
> Scroogle, is/was the best out there - by a mile! Nothing even comes close,
> unfortunately!
What about ixquick.com?
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin
On 2/21/2012 8:38 AM, t...@lists.grepular.com wrote:
On 21/02/12 14:27, Mr Dash Four wrote:
I've started using this instead: https://startpage.com/
It provides Google search results, supports https, works without
javascript enabled, seems to be hosted in the Netherlands and they take
a good ap
Would be interesting to find out which particular aspect of your configuration
is leading to that error message.
That is not the issue - the fact that startpage is snooping to see
whether I use "privacy-oriented browser extension" should be good-enough
reason for any sane individual out the
Why did you pick seeks over YaCy?
Neither are any good - from what I gather, yacy requires software
installed on my machine (yeah, right, why would I want to pollute my
machine with some unknown software for the "privilege" of using a bloody
search engine?) and seeks isn't any good either,
re all,
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012, pro...@tormail.net wrote:
> It's an interesting update and I hope it will widespread along all
> public DNS servers.
what is the difference between DNSCrypt and a simple compination of
ssh and socat? something like:
Iclient$ ssh -L 5353:127.0.0.1:5353 server
Iser
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:59:36PM +0100, Okhin wrote:
>
> > You should rather move to FLOSS and decentralized search engine such as
> > seeks (seeks-project.info) or Yacy.
> >
> > I run a personnal node for seeks for more than a year now, on the
> > lat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:57:52 +0100
Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:59:36PM +0100, Okhin wrote:
>
> > You should rather move to FLOSS and decentralized search engine
> > such as seeks (seeks-project.info) or Yacy.
> >
> > I run a per
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:44:48 +
Mr Dash Four wrote:
>
> > Why did you pick seeks over YaCy?
> >
> Neither are any good - from what I gather, yacy requires software
> installed on my machine (yeah, right, why would I want to pollute my
> mach
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:59:36PM +0100, Okhin wrote:
> You should rather move to FLOSS and decentralized search engine such as
> seeks (seeks-project.info) or Yacy.
>
> I run a personnal node for seeks for more than a year now, on the
> latest experimental version, and I do not use any other se
I've tried DuckduckGo, It isn't for heavy engine users. It seems like a
childrens search engine, and it has a lousy results format format.
I don't understand how Ixquick/Startpage can tap Google, yet Google goes
out of its way to crush Scroogle, which was by far the best out of what
I've found an
On 21/02/12 14:27, Mr Dash Four wrote:
>> I've started using this instead: https://startpage.com/
>>
>> It provides Google search results, supports https, works without
>> javascript enabled, seems to be hosted in the Netherlands and they take
>> a good approach to privacy:
>>
>> https://startpage
I've tried DuckduckGo, It isn't for heavy engine users. It seems like a
childrens search engine, and it has a lousy results format format.
I don't understand how Ixquick/Startpage can tap Google, yet Google goes
out of its way to crush Scroogle, which was by far the best out of what
I've found
I've started using this instead: https://startpage.com/
It provides Google search results, supports https, works without
javascript enabled, seems to be hosted in the Netherlands and they take
a good approach to privacy:
https://startpage.com/eng/protect-privacy.html
"You may be using a pri
On 21/02/2012 12:09, miniBill wrote:
> Il 21 febbraio 2012 09:09, Andrew Lewman ha scritto:
>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:15:37 +0800
>> Koh Choon Lin <2choon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> "The authorities in Singapore are understood to have the ability to
>>> track down a person online even if he or she u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:50:33 +0100
Marlon wrote:
> Startpage and DuckDuckGo.
>
> Give them a try :)
>
You should rather move to FLOSS and decentralized search engine such as
seeks (seeks-project.info) or Yacy.
I run a personnal node for seeks for
DuckDuckGo is running a TOR service at
http://3g2upl4pq6kufc4m.onion
Marlon schrieb am 21.02.2012 11:50:33
> Startpage and DuckDuckGo.
>
> Give them a try :)
>
> 2012/2/21 Jim
>
>> scroogle.org no longer resolves
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@l
Il 21 febbraio 2012 09:09, Andrew Lewman ha scritto:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:15:37 +0800
> Koh Choon Lin <2choon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> "The authorities in Singapore are understood to have the ability to
>> track down a person online even if he or she uses anonymizing
>> facilities such as Virtu
Hey all,
I was unable to find this question in the documentation, so I'll ask it
here. I hope it's the right place.
What happens when two servers running TOR provide a hidden service using
the same private key?
Which one will get the requests for that service? Will it be distributed
randomly, or
Startpage and DuckDuckGo.
Give them a try :)
2012/2/21 Jim
> scroogle.org no longer resolves
> ___
> tor-talk mailing list
> tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
_
I just went through this. You have to import Erin's key into your
certificate handler (Kleopatra or whatever), and then verify the browser
.gz.asc file against that. HTH eliaz
On 2/20/2012 11:55 AM, James Brown wrote:
> Hello, friends!
>
> I have got a new TBB file
> tor-browser-gnu-linux-x86_64-
02/20/2012 09:52 PM, Ian Strange:
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Runa A. Sandvik
>
>>
>> I think this just makes a live Tail USB not an installed one.
>
> Yep.
>
> According to
> https://tails.boum.org/doc/encryption_and_privacy/your_data_wont_be_saved_unless_explicitely_asked/index.en.htm
On 21/02/12 07:25, Jim wrote:
> scroogle.org no longer resolves
Yes, it's been like that for a few days, and a few days prior to that it
was just throwing error messages about Google blocking them.
I've started using this instead: https://startpage.com/
It provides Google search results, suppor
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:15:37 +0800
Koh Choon Lin <2choon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "The authorities in Singapore are understood to have the ability to
> track down a person online even if he or she uses anonymizing
> facilities such as Virtual Private Networking, TOR onion routing, or
> other forms of
62 matches
Mail list logo
