- Forwarded message from Michael Rogers mich...@briarproject.org -
From: Michael Rogers mich...@briarproject.org
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:45:21 +0100
To: jam...@echeque.com, Tahoe-LAFS development tahoe-...@tahoe-lafs.org
Subject: Re: [tahoe-dev] switching from introducers to gossip?
I think the concept of hidden services has a lot potential. Not only
because they are hidden. Let's face it:
- You get a free domain for live.
- You get transparent, free end to end encryption. No flawed root CA system.
- That's something remarkable, isn't it?
With some modifications/improvements
Yo,
i really appreciate such discussion about empowering TorHS, a lot of
work still have to be done to make proper leverage of the capabilities
that TorHS provide.
On 7/11/12 5:36 PM, proper wrote:
I think the concept of hidden services has a lot potential. Not only
because they are hidden.
Hi,
- You get transparent, free end to end encryption. No flawed root CA system.
Just curious, maybe I am overlooking something: how would this be better than a
self-signed and self-generated certificate (apart from the user not being
nagged with a warning)?
--
Rejo Zenger . r...@zenger.nl
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Rejo Zenger r...@zenger.nl wrote:
Hi,
- You get transparent, free end to end encryption. No flawed root CA system.
Just curious, maybe I am overlooking something: how would this be better than
a self-signed and self-generated certificate (apart from the user
Rejo Zenger:
Hi,
- You get transparent, free end to end encryption. No flawed root CA system.
Just curious, maybe I am overlooking something: how would this be better than
a self-signed and self-generated certificate (apart from the user not being
nagged with a warning)?
Self-signed:
Fabio Pietrosanti (naif):
Yo,
i really appreciate such discussion about empowering TorHS, a lot of
work still have to be done to make proper leverage of the capabilities
that TorHS provide.
On 7/11/12 5:36 PM, proper wrote:
I think the concept of hidden services has a lot potential. Not
Am Mittwoch, 11. Juli 2012, 17:43:52 schrieb Fabio Pietrosanti:
Don't exaggerate, it still need a software client to access them, so the
usability is heavily impacted.
This imply that TorHS are not for general uses in the context of mutual
anonymity .
What about a Firefox/Chromium addon, that
tor-admin:
Am Mittwoch, 11. Juli 2012, 17:43:52 schrieb Fabio Pietrosanti:
Don't exaggerate, it still need a software client to access them, so the
usability is heavily impacted.
This imply that TorHS are not for general uses in the context of mutual
anonymity .
What about a Firefox/Chromium
