[tor-talk] Shout out to Google from Tor users everywhere

Quote Google: "Our systems have detected unusual traffic from your computer network. Please try your request again later. Why did this happen?" "We're sorry ... but your computer or network may be sending automated queries. To protect our users, we can't process your request right now." Right..

Re: [tor-talk] Shout out to Google from Tor users everywhere

On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 04:56:03 -0400 grarpamp allegedly wrote: > > Yeah, whatever Google, you were cool once, but now, soo lame. They stopped being cool a long time ago. - Mick Morgan gpg fingerprint: FC23 3338 F664 5E66 876B

Re: [tor-talk] Shout out to Google from Tor users everywhere

22.10.2013 14:07, mick wrote: > On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 04:56:03 -0400 > grarpamp allegedly wrote: >> Yeah, whatever Google, you were cool once, but now, soo lame. > They stopped being cool a long time ago. > > - > > Mick Morgan > g

[tor-talk] TBB and tor-relays as a bitcoin wallets

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi all, Just an idea. In theory : is it possible to implement bitcoin wallet into tor-relay and TBB 1) ? TBB users could tip tor-relays (f.e. 1 satoshi for guard and middle relay, 3 satoshi for exit-node per circuit). Running tor-relays could be pr

Re: [tor-talk] Shout out to Google from Tor users everywhere

I don't think it's Tor related. I use one of my servers at OVH for VPN and I get the same messages. But in 99% where I get these messages I also get a captcha that will unblock my session temporarily. On 10/22/2013 10:56 AM, grarpamp wrote: > Quote Google: > > "Our systems have detected unusual t

Re: [tor-talk] TBB and tor-relays as a bitcoin wallets

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:40:52 + Trigger Happy wrote: > Just an idea. In theory : is it possible to implement bitcoin wallet > into tor-relay and TBB 1) ? TBB users could tip tor-relays (f.e. 1 > satoshi for guard and middle relay, 3 satoshi for e

Re: [tor-talk] Fwd: Can You Trust NIST?

On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 12:28 -0400, Tom Goldman wrote: > NOTE: Sorry about sending that duplicate. > > Best regards, > cl34r > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Tom Goldman wrote: > > > Recently, I stumbled upon a very interesting article at > > http://spectrum.ieee.org/telecom/security/can-yo

Re: [tor-talk] TBB and tor-relays as a bitcoin wallets

Also, Bitcoin is not anonymous [1]. So while relays are public, generally the Tor clients take great pains to not disclose their identities. If clients starting tipping relays, to their relay public key, a good attacker would guess would be that a Tor client used that relay. Then I think some li

Re: [tor-talk] Shout out to Google from Tor users everywhere

Quit top posting. On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Philipp Born wrote: > I don't think it's Tor related. I use one of my servers at OVH for VPN > and I get the same messages. But in 99% where I get these messages I > also get a captcha that will unblock my session temporarily. I routinely see s

Re: [tor-talk] Fwd: Can You Trust NIST?

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:45:15PM -0400, Niels Elgaard Larsen wrote: > On 13-10-18 10:10 AM, Tom Goldman wrote: > >Recently, I stumbled upon a very interesting article at > >http://spectrum.ieee.org/telecom/security/can-you-trust-nist > > Does this mean that Tor could technically be weakened by t

Re: [tor-talk] TBB and tor-relays as a bitcoin wallets

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:09:52PM +0600, Roman Mamedov wrote: > > 1).I think Cody Wilson is working on a bitcoin wallet in a browser. > > Please stop trying to make people build buttcoin wallets into everything. Not > everyone may be a fan of your "satoshi"-shitoshi pyramid scheme, shocked eh?

[tor-talk] Be anonymous without Tor

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello! How many ways are there to be anonymous without using Tor? I think that these are most of the options out there: VPN, Web Proxy & something else? Regars, Anonymous and Internet freedom(Free Speech) supporter. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [tor-talk] Be anonymous without Tor

Anonymous wrote: > How many ways are there to be anonymous without using Tor? > > I think that these are most of the options out there: > VPN, Web Proxy & something else? This depends on what kind of anonymity you are looking for, and from whom. The answer to your question is entirely dependent o

[tor-talk] TBB prefs_prompt to sanitize on shutdown?

May be mistaken, but I thought the 1st pref below (included in TBB by default) was to bring back the old Fx 3.x, "clear private data" prefs, much like using the extension, "AskForSanitize" does. These are default values in TBB (I think): user_pref("privacy.sanitize.migrateFx3Prefs", true); use

[tor-talk] Me whining and complaining Re: Shout out to Google from Tor users everywhere

On 22.10.2013 10:56, grarpamp wrote: Right... biggest search engine loaded with ridiculous amounts of money, bandwidth, hardware, talent and code ... and you choose to deny search to Tor users who couldn't possibly hurt your silly search portal... I fail to grasp why every geek feels a need to

Re: [tor-talk] TBB and tor-relays as a bitcoin wallets

On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 19:41:27 +0200 Eugen Leitl wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:09:52PM +0600, Roman Mamedov wrote: > > > > 1).I think Cody Wilson is working on a bitcoin wallet in a browser. > > > > Please stop trying to make people build buttcoin wallets into everything. > > Not > > every

[tor-talk] Linux Kodachi

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Check out new Tor distro - Linux Kodachi http://www.digi77.com/linux-kodachi/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/linuxkodachi/ - -- Trigger Happy jabber: triggerha...@jabber.ccc.de torchat: xruq34bnhbqlkjtn -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBA

Re: [tor-talk] Be anonymous without Tor

As far as I can tell, the main competitor to Tor, which is far behind in network size, is I2P. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I2P -Kristov On 2013-10-22 11:58, Anonymous wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello! How many ways are there to be anonymous without using Tor? I think th

Re: [tor-talk] Linux + Tor

On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 19:16 +, Marcos Eugenio Kehl wrote: > Thank you people.You are very profissional. I am just a beginner who wants to > throw away Windows, and use Linux with LibreOffice. I will test Whoix and > Tails, as well as Ubuntu.Long life for Tor!Marcos (Brasil) Marcos, você é pa

Re: [tor-talk] Linux Kodachi

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 06:42:51PM +, Trigger Happy wrote: > Check out new Tor distro - Linux Kodachi > > http://www.digi77.com/linux-kodachi/ > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/linuxkodachi/ A new project that was foolish enough to select sourceforge as their hosting? That, alone, is disq

Re: [tor-talk] TBB and tor-relays as a bitcoin wallets

Pay-to-route seems likely in the future for the capitalists amongst participants in P2P routing networks. Bitcoin is as good a medium for that to take place as any, but great care would need to be taken in order not to ruin the anonymity achieved through using Tor. It would be especially tricky

Re: [tor-talk] Be anonymous without Tor

On 13-10-22 02:58 PM, aut...@anonymousbitcoinbook.com wrote: > As far as I can tell, the main competitor to Tor, which is far behind in > network size, is I2P. > > en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I2P > > -Kristov > > On 2013-10-22 11:58, Anonymous wrote: > Hello! > > How many ways are there to be anonymo

Re: [tor-talk] [RELEASE] Torsocks 2.0.0-rc2

David Goulet (2013-09-02): > After a week or so, the release candidate 2 is now out after receiving various > contributions for BSD and OS X support. > > A quick note. Please use the Github bug tracker for any issues and *not* > trac.torproject.org. Until this code base is accepted as a potential

Re: [tor-talk] Me whining and complaining Re: Shout out to Google from Tor users everywhere

--On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 8:34 PM +0200 Antispam 06 wrote: > On 22.10.2013 10:56, grarpamp wrote: >> Right... biggest search engine loaded with ridiculous amounts of >> money, bandwidth, hardware, talent and code ... and you choose to >> deny search to Tor users who couldn't possibly hurt

Re: [tor-talk] TBB and tor-relays as a bitcoin wallets

On 10/22/2013 08:40 AM, Trigger Happy wrote: > Hi all, > > Just an idea. In theory : is it possible to implement bitcoin wallet > into tor-relay and TBB 1) ? TBB users could tip tor-relays (f.e. 1 > satoshi for guard and middle relay, 3 satoshi for exit-node per > circuit). Running tor-relays co

Re: [tor-talk] Be anonymous without Tor

On 10/22/2013 11:58 AM, Anonymous wrote: > > Hello! > > How many ways are there to be anonymous without using Tor? > > I think that these are most of the options out there: > VPN, Web Proxy & something else? As krishna e bara notes, online anonymity is arguably impossible. Tor at least provides

[tor-talk] VOIP and tor

Is mumble secure over tor? Is it the best to use for Voip call on tor? What are the other options? -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

Re: [tor-talk] VOIP and tor

Search our blog at https://guardianproject.info/blog for a few posts on Mumble over Tor and Skype over Tor. I know Skype over Tor is a ridiculous notion, but it is a fascinating experiment. +n Andrew F wrote: >Is mumble secure over tor? >Is it the best to use for Voip call on tor? > > >What

Re: [tor-talk] VOIP and tor

On 10/22/2013 06:52 PM, Andrew F wrote: > Is mumble secure over tor? I've used Mumble, with data transmission in UDP mode, on OpenVPN (in TCP mode) through Tor. Given that you, or someone whom you trust, are running the Mumble server, and that traffic is routed by VPN through Tor, I believe that

Re: [tor-talk] VOIP and tor

On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 00:52:07 + Andrew F wrote: > Is mumble secure over tor? > Is it the best to use for Voip call on tor? > Right now there are DNS leaks when using the native proxy settings, but it works fine with torsocks. See also: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/Torify

Re: [tor-talk] TBB and tor-relays as a bitcoin wallets

On Oct 22, 2013 Joshua Datko TOP POSTED!!! > Also, and I think this was discussed on this list before, offering payment > may actually decrease the number of volunteers [2]. > > I was initially interested in researching a technical way to offer payments > to relays by the clients joining a mining

Re: [tor-talk] VOIP and tor

On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 20:18:56 -0600 Mirimir wrote: > On 10/22/2013 06:52 PM, Andrew F wrote: > > > Is it the best to use for Voip call on tor? > > I think so. Because it can use UDP through the VPN tunnel, there's > virtually no break-up. Latency is high (1-2 seconds) but that's just a > fact o

Re: [tor-talk] VOIP and tor

On 10/22/2013 08:59 PM, Matt wrote: > On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 20:18:56 -0600 > Mirimir wrote: > >> On 10/22/2013 06:52 PM, Andrew F wrote: >> > >>> Is it the best to use for Voip call on tor? >> >> I think so. Because it can use UDP through the VPN tunnel, there's >> virtually no break-up. Latency

Re: [tor-talk] Linux Kodachi

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Trigger Happy wrote: > Check out new Tor distro - Linux Kodachi > http://www.digi77.com/linux-kodachi/ > http://sourceforge.net/projects/linuxkodachi/ > jabber: triggerha...@jabber.ccc.de > torchat: xruq34bnhbqlkjtn https://www.facebook.com/oitseeds https://www.fac

Re: [tor-talk] Linux Kodachi

On 10/23/13, 5:42 AM, Trigger Happy wrote: Check out new Tor distro - Linux Kodachi http://www.digi77.com/linux-kodachi/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/linuxkodachi/ Where's the source code to Kodachi? Who are "Eagle Eye Digital Solutions"? No meatspace details whatever on

Re: [tor-talk] Linux Kodachi

On 13-10-22 11:56 PM, Peter Tonoli wrote: > On 10/23/13, 5:42 AM, Trigger Happy wrote: >> Check out new Tor distro - Linux Kodachi >> >> http://www.digi77.com/linux-kodachi/ >> >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/linuxkodachi/ > > Where's the source code to Kodachi? If anyone has time please check

Re: [tor-talk] Linux Kodachi

krishna e bera writes: > If anyone has time please check the details listed at > https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-violation.html > and report it, > If it is called Linux it probably contains enough GNU stuff that source > code must be made available. Also enough _Linux_ stuff that source code mus

Re: [tor-talk] VOIP and tor

On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 21:15:46 -0600 Mirimir wrote: > Was there much break-up? > The sound quality was surprisingly clear in my tests, and I didn't have any dropped calls, even over extended periods of time. > I never got around to directly comparing UDP mode via VPN via Tor, > versus TCP mode