Do you mean, publically standing by team members who doxx and harass other
people? Vivek Wadhwa for example was not harassing women, he simply had a
public opinion on feminism. Oh, I guess they should have thought about that
before they joined the patriarchy!
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Chris
benjamin barber wrote:
Tor ethics board response is as follows:
Heh. Thought you had turned over a new leaf as your last few posts
forgot to include the now obligatory b barber mantrum on the horrific
evil of Tor putting out an anti-harassment policy and publicly standing
by team members ge
benjamin barber writes:
> Tor ethics board response is as follows:
>
> Obviously they're just members of the patriarchy who want to harass women
> on the internet, they just need to listen and believe this woman's
> experience, everyone knows that neither women or government institutions
> ever d
Tor ethics board response is as follows:
Obviously they're just members of the patriarchy who want to harass women
on the internet, they just need to listen and believe this woman's
experience, everyone knows that neither women or government institutions
ever do anything immoral. The tor network s
Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.ch), encrypted email based in
Switzerland.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Fw: German University signs up 24 tor relays
Time (GMT): May 06 2015 16:25:55
From: wgreenho...@riseup.net
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
And of cour
JS733NknRj6J writes:
> 1) I think you may have missed the fact (signaled by the "oh wait"
> at the end of my email) that i was being sarcastic and agreeing with
> you.
Sorry. *makes hand gesture of accidentally being in violent agreement*
> 2) the point about Federal (and in some cases, State)
Obviously they're just members of the patriarchy who want to harass women
on the internet, they just need to listen and believe this woman's
experience, everyone knows that neither women or government institutions
ever do anything immoral. The tor network should be a save space for all
sorts of peo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
As far as bookmarks are concerned, no I don't believe they can put you
at any further risk assuming there isn't a personally identifiable
session in the URL. Also be aware that bookmarks can contain
JavaScript.
Would be interested on some other inpu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
The simplest answer is yes it does, JavaScript "could" be used to
attempt to reveal you so it's best to assume that it will and disable
it.
As far as Facebook is concerned I believe the mobile site
(m.facebook.com) is a little bit lighter on scripts
Hello,
I just wanted to ask a few things.
I use Tutanota.de for email. a couple bank websites and facebook. But in
order for them to work I have to enable javascript.
Will it put me at risk to enable scripts in these cases?
Also, does it put me at risk to use bookmarks?
Thanks
--
tor-talk m
Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.ch), encrypted email based in
Switzerland.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Fw: German University signs up 24 tor relays
Time (GMT): May 06 2015 15:24:20
From: wgreenho...@riseup.net
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
JS733NknRj6
JS733NknRj6J writes:
> for the most part, this is only true only for entities that receive
> government funding.
Completely false. For example, if a corporation funds medical research
at a university, that still requires IRB approval.
Lack of government funding is not some kind of
workaround for
Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.ch), encrypted email based in
Switzerland.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] German University signs up 24 tor relays
Time (GMT): May 06 2015 15:11:06
From: js733nknr...@protonmail.com
To: wgreenho...@riseup.net
Sent f
"l.m" writes:
> You should be grateful for their work, not self-righteous. What the
> hell do you think? The university pays for the relays and doesn't have
> a code of conduct for student activity using university resource? That
> code of conduct somehow doesn't apply to this graduate or their
>
On Wed, 06 May 2015 07:24:04 +, l.m wrote:
...
> Pretending an attempt didn't occur to force disclosure doesn't change
> the fact that it didn't happen.
You definintion of 'force' obviously includes
asking "how's the weather over there".
Andreas
--
"Totally trivial. Famous last words."
From
On 06 May (19:28:38), teor wrote:
> >
> > Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 18:49:39 -0500
> > From: Tom Ritter
> >
> > On 5 May 2015 at 07:53, Fabian Keil wrote:
> >> Great.
> >>
> >> A couple of comments (about v1.3):
> >
> > Thanks! I made the changes and put up a 1.4
> >
> >> Page 141 and 142 seem t
Tor Weekly NewsMay 6th, 2015
Welcome to the eighteenth issue in 2015 of Tor Weekly News, the weekly
newslett
>Pretending an attempt didn't occur to force disclosure doesn't change
>the fact that it didn't happen.
In before Andreas, that should be didn't->did
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman
>> The people who operate them are public
>> figures too.
>You're the only one claiming that.
>
>Neither did Roger force the Aachen operator
>out - nobody except for LE even can do that.
I'm pretty sure I defended the researcher's right not to disclose
anything. Had nothing been disclosed these r
>relays are inherently public
Relays are a machine, an ip, a server, with a public relay descriptor.
You ISP has a similar descriptor for your CPE connected to their
infrastructure. So the ip you use is public without precaution. Does
that automatically make the association of you with that ip an
On Wed, 06 May 2015 06:54:27 +, l.m wrote:
...
> Fine. Relays are public.
They are.
> The people who operate them are public
> figures too.
You're the only one claiming that.
Neither did Roger force the Aachen operator
out - nobody except for LE even can do that.
Andreas
--
"Totally triv
>"Dodgson, Dodgson, we've got Dodgson here!"
>... in other words, relays are inherently public.
What? did you actually contribute to the conversation? What the hell
does that even mean?
Fine. Relays are public. The people who operate them are public
figures too. To hell with privacy.
HS descri
It is a practical problem.
Generally speaking there are those on the inside and the mass on the outer.
It is true of most groups, isn't it?
Robert
> -Original Message-
> From: tim.cochrane.lap...@gmail.com
> Sent: Wed, 06 May 2015 13:43:27 +0800
>
> > The trouble seems to be trusting u
On 5/5/15, l.m wrote:
> I didn't say wondering about an anomaly is disrespectful. Assuming you
> have the right bring their relay's to everyone's attention is
> disrespectful.
"Dodgson, Dodgson, we've got Dodgson here!"
... in other words, relays are inherently public.
more importantly, this i
>
> Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 18:49:39 -0500
> From: Tom Ritter
>
> On 5 May 2015 at 07:53, Fabian Keil wrote:
>> Great.
>>
>> A couple of comments (about v1.3):
>
> Thanks! I made the changes and put up a 1.4
>
>> Page 141 and 142 seem to suggest that parsing strings is more
>> likely to be vul
25 matches
Mail list logo
