Anyone else noticing slashdot, google, and a few
other big ones i can't recall, now throwing annoying
popups with 'hey, we're using cookies, click to agree
to this' ? What new legal groupthink bs is behind this?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change othe
On 5/29/2014 8:18 PM, grarpamp wrote:
Anyone else noticing slashdot, google, and a few
other big ones i can't recall, now throwing annoying
popups with 'hey, we're using cookies, click to agree
to this' ? What new legal groupthink bs is behind this?
I don't use gobble, but I've noticed a few more
On 5/29/2014 9:18 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> Anyone else noticing slashdot, google, and a few
> other big ones i can't recall, now throwing annoying
> popups with 'hey, we're using cookies, click to agree
> to this' ? What new legal groupthink bs is behind this?
It has to do with some law in the EU[1]
Here's one such silly new popup (from /., google uses a blurb at the
top of the page), it might be country based and probably only affects
users who properly clear their cookies. I just wish they'd tell the
user what else they do, like mine them.
Your Choice Regarding Cookies on this Site
Cookies
* on the Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:40:24PM -0400, Michael Wolf wrote:
>> Anyone else noticing slashdot, google, and a few
>> other big ones i can't recall, now throwing annoying
>> popups with 'hey, we're using cookies, click to agree
>> to this' ? What new legal groupthink bs is behind this?
>
> I
On 5/30/2014 2:11 AM, Mike Cardwell wrote:
* on the Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:40:24PM -0400, Michael Wolf wrote:
Anyone else noticing slashdot, google, and a few
other big ones i can't recall, now throwing annoying
popups with 'hey, we're using cookies, click to agree
to this' ? What new legal g
* on the Fri, May 30, 2014 at 09:32:15AM -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
Anyone else noticing slashdot, google, and a few
other big ones i can't recall, now throwing annoying
popups with 'hey, we're using cookies, click to agree
to this' ? What new legal groupthink bs is behind this?
On 5/30/2014 12:58 PM, Mike Cardwell wrote:
* on the Fri, May 30, 2014 at 09:32:15AM -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
Myself and a few other people have been slowly building an Adblock
filter list to remove these cookie warnings from sites for about 2
years now:
That's good, but how will blocking t
* on the Fri, May 30, 2014 at 02:51:33PM -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> So the ABP filter is to block cookie notifications? Meaning, users have
> to already have cookie permissions set? And for new sites, they must
> remember when sites don't load or work correctly (notices are blocked),
> it ma
On 05/30/14 13:36, Mike Cardwell wrote:
* on the Fri, May 30, 2014 at 02:51:33PM -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
So the ABP filter is to block cookie notifications? Meaning, users have
to already have cookie permissions set? And for new sites, they must
remember when sites don't load or work correc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
The TBB with TorButton has the ability to delete all cookies.
Than the site can't track you, but you can enable first party cookies.
SecTech
On Sun, 01 Jun 2014 11:40:28 -0700
The Tuber wrote:
> Isn't blocking first party cookies useful in that
On 6/2/2014 1:49 PM, SecTech wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
The TBB with TorButton has the ability to delete all cookies.
Than the site can't track you, but you can enable first party cookies.
SecTech
AFAIK, Torbutton doesn't have the ability to delete 1st party cookies
12 matches
Mail list logo
