-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
just in case if someone is wondering who caused this month's little
spike in relaycount on 2015-05-01:
https://metrics.torproject.org/versions.html
The IP addresses are associated with a German University [1], maybe
they are doing some research
So no t-shirts either! :-)
>
>
> - - no contact
> - - no family
>
>
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Hi,
nusenu:
> just in case if someone is wondering who caused this month's little
> spike in relaycount on 2015-05-01:
> https://metrics.torproject.org/versions.html
>
> The IP addresses are associated with a German University
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RWTH_Aachen_University, maybe
> they ar
Hi,
> nusenu:
> just in case if someone is wondering who caused this month's little
> spike in relaycount on 2015-05-01:
> https://metrics.torproject.org/versions.html
>
> The IP addresses are associated with a German University
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RWTH_Aachen_University, maybe
> they
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 04:33:24PM +0200, Asya Mitseva wrote:
> I am a master student at RWTH Aachen University and I am doing a
> research on Tor as a part of my master thesis. I had to start a few
> relays for my work and I will keep them running for some period of
> time.
>
> In case of problem
I'm not trying to upset anyone but do we really have to stalk every
researcher who adds relays? Honestly, does there need to be a report
on x-number of relays were added, constituting a spike this month to
date? I mean this purely out of respect for tor-related research
worldwide. Engaging in t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Thanks for coming forward!
> I am a master student at RWTH Aachen University and I am doing a
> research on Tor as a part of my master thesis. I had to start a
> few relays for my work and I will keep them running for some period
> of time.
>
> In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
> I'm not trying to upset anyone but do we really have to stalk every
> researcher who adds relays? Honestly, does there need to be a
> report on x-number of relays were added, constituting a spike this
> month to date? I mean this purely out of
I didn't say wondering about an anomaly is disrespectful. Assuming you
have the right bring their relay's to everyone's attention is
disrespectful. This is a network around privacy and anonymity
after-all. Isn't there a better way to start a witch hunt? Like
discovering relay's that do something wr
Tor is not some private kingdom. It's an open application
used and operated by whoever for whatever. It is absolutely
the business of interested users to report, bring attention,
interrogate and make lists of relays to use, promote or badexit as
desired. And the business of relays to contactinfo, f
grarpamp writes:
> Tor is not some private kingdom. It's an open application
> used and operated by whoever for whatever. It is absolutely
> the business of interested users to report, bring attention,
> interrogate and make lists of relays to use, promote or badexit as
> desired. And the busines
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:47 PM, W. Greenhouse wrote:
> grarpamp writes:
>
>> Tor is not some private kingdom. It's an open application
>> used and operated by whoever for whatever. It is absolutely
>> the business of interested users to report, bring attention,
>> interrogate and make lists of re
On 5/5/15, l.m wrote:
> I didn't say wondering about an anomaly is disrespectful. Assuming you
> have the right bring their relay's to everyone's attention is
> disrespectful.
"Dodgson, Dodgson, we've got Dodgson here!"
... in other words, relays are inherently public.
more importantly, this i
>"Dodgson, Dodgson, we've got Dodgson here!"
>... in other words, relays are inherently public.
What? did you actually contribute to the conversation? What the hell
does that even mean?
Fine. Relays are public. The people who operate them are public
figures too. To hell with privacy.
HS descri
On Wed, 06 May 2015 06:54:27 +, l.m wrote:
...
> Fine. Relays are public.
They are.
> The people who operate them are public
> figures too.
You're the only one claiming that.
Neither did Roger force the Aachen operator
out - nobody except for LE even can do that.
Andreas
--
"Totally triv
>relays are inherently public
Relays are a machine, an ip, a server, with a public relay descriptor.
You ISP has a similar descriptor for your CPE connected to their
infrastructure. So the ip you use is public without precaution. Does
that automatically make the association of you with that ip an
>> The people who operate them are public
>> figures too.
>You're the only one claiming that.
>
>Neither did Roger force the Aachen operator
>out - nobody except for LE even can do that.
I'm pretty sure I defended the researcher's right not to disclose
anything. Had nothing been disclosed these r
>Pretending an attempt didn't occur to force disclosure doesn't change
>the fact that it didn't happen.
In before Andreas, that should be didn't->did
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman
On Wed, 06 May 2015 07:24:04 +, l.m wrote:
...
> Pretending an attempt didn't occur to force disclosure doesn't change
> the fact that it didn't happen.
You definintion of 'force' obviously includes
asking "how's the weather over there".
Andreas
--
"Totally trivial. Famous last words."
From
"l.m" writes:
> You should be grateful for their work, not self-righteous. What the
> hell do you think? The university pays for the relays and doesn't have
> a code of conduct for student activity using university resource? That
> code of conduct somehow doesn't apply to this graduate or their
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
