On 10/21/2013 06:20 PM,
bm-2ctpedtadjx2bqf6wuux1cper78sq3x...@bitmessage.ch wrote:
> On 21.10.2013 07:34, Mirimir wrote:> On 10/20/2013 01:19 PM, Antispam 06
> wrote:
>>> That's so cute! Can you point out some time a spy agency was brought in
>>> front of a judge for not respecting the law. The sam
On 21.10.2013 07:34, Mirimir wrote:> On 10/20/2013 01:19 PM, Antispam 06
wrote:
>> That's so cute! Can you point out some time a spy agency was brought in
>> front of a judge for not respecting the law. The same law written in
>> stone in some countries as «nobody is above the law». Do you know of
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 08:54:12PM +0200, Antispam 06 wrote:
> My own. Never published as the spammers seem hungry for addresses.
> Compiled by spending time around privacy or security lists. Somehow
> like the /ignore in IRC.
I went exactly the other way. I've been doing about
zero filtering for
On 10/20/2013 01:19 PM, Antispam 06 wrote:
> On 20.10.2013 20:41, Anonymous wrote:
>> I have also noticed an interesting thing which is that it's pretty
>> hard to find email service that hides your own IP address and this
>> one that i'm currenty using is one of those.
>
> Jacob Appelbaum, Sukhbi
On 2013-10-20 13:19, Antispam 06 wrote:
That's so cute! Can you point out some time a spy agency was brought
in
front of a judge for not respecting the law. The same law written in
stone in some countries as «nobody is above the law». Do you know of a
time when they were found guilty and punish
On 10/20/2013 2:19 PM, Antispam 06 wrote:
On 20.10.2013 20:41, Anonymous wrote:
I'm using an Finland provider 'cuz their law does not allow any other
agentcy or anything like that to gain access to your files so
easilly.
That's so cute! Can you point out some time a spy agency was brought in
fr
On 20.10.2013 20:41, Anonymous wrote:
I have also noticed an interesting thing which is that it's pretty
hard to find email service that hides your own IP address and this
one that i'm currenty using is one of those.
Jacob Appelbaum, Sukhbir Singh and tagnaq worked hard to give the world
TorBir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm using my own/vps to use with my own domain and it's much easier when
you may/can choose what you use your domain for. For example: For
hosting your own site with info about you or something else.
I actually own an 478 socket PC which still is on
On 20.10.2013 19:58, Anonymous wrote:
What list are you talking about?
My own. Never published as the spammers seem hungry for addresses.
Compiled by spending time around privacy or security lists. Somehow like
the /ignore in IRC.
Please, do care about top posting. Check out
http://mailform
On 20.10.2013 19:43, Roman Mamedov wrote:
I am not sure "what about" them, but having E-Mail on your own
domain is the only way to have an E-Mail address you can rely on to
have any sort of longevity while allowing you the choice of
providers.
Sure. Your domain. If your name is John Johnson, yo
What list are you talking about?
Also it's some times like this:
firstn...@firstname-lastname.com/biz/net/jne..
20.10.2013 19:58, Antispam 06 wrote
> On 20.10.2013 18:09, Anonymous wrote:
>> What about users own domains? :)
>
> Checked that list. Mostly vanity domains like
> $fist_name@$last_name
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 18:58:34 +0200
Antispam 06 wrote:
> On 20.10.2013 18:09, Anonymous wrote:
> > What about users own domains? :)
>
> Checked that list. Mostly vanity domains like $fist_name@$last_name.com.
> I think it's the same with car licence plates.
I am not sure "what about" them, but
On 20.10.2013 18:09, Anonymous wrote:
What about users own domains? :)
Checked that list. Mostly vanity domains like $fist_name@$last_name.com.
I think it's the same with car licence plates.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go t
What about users own domains? :)
20.10.2013 18:35, Antispam 06 kirjoitti:
> On 15.10.2013 16:29, Jon wrote:
>> Another article from the Washington Post may be interested in.
>
> Just checked my list of useless posters. Gmail has more than 60%.
> Interesting.
>
> Dude, really, go register with Fac
On 15.10.2013 16:29, Jon wrote:
Another article from the Washington Post may be interested in.
Just checked my list of useless posters. Gmail has more than 60%.
Interesting.
Dude, really, go register with Facebook or some other herding site.
Reposting is nil.
--
tor-talk mailing list - to
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 04:05:58PM +0600, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> Several years down the road, when the fashionable shortener service of the day
> is long dead in the water, to a future reader there is no way to tell where
> this URL used to go, and not knowing the URL they can't even use the Inter
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 17:22:18 +
Tempest wrote:
> Michael Wolf:
> >
> > I only commented that I don't click on the "tinyurl"s, since I have
> > no idea where they're going.
>
> use longurl.org or someting similar to see where they go. It will
> expand shortened links for you
Several years do
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 17:22:18 +
Tempest wrote:
> Michael Wolf:
> >
> > I only commented that I don't click on the "tinyurl"s, since I have
> > no idea where they're going.
>
> use longurl.org or someting similar to see where they go. It will
> expand shortened links for you and give you the
Michael Wolf:
>
> I only commented that I don't click on the "tinyurl"s, since I have
> no idea where they're going.
use longurl.org or someting similar to see where they go. It will
expand shortened links for you and give you the end result without
requiring javascript or complaining about tor.
On 10/16/2013 2:45 AM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 02:00:23 -0400
> grarpamp wrote:
>
>> Ironic to see them using these to link to recent revelations when...
>> - it's centralized,
>
> Irony here is that all three of you are still using GMail. :)
>
>
>
It would only be ironic
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 02:00:23 -0400
grarpamp wrote:
> Ironic to see them using these to link to recent revelations when...
> - it's centralized,
Irony here is that all three of you are still using GMail. :)
--
With respect,
Roman
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
tor-talk mailing l
grarpamp grarpamp (grampamp?) wrote:
hese people think all of life is a text message and, just like lazy top
posters, blissfully inflict their scourge on others. They also like to
force eyeballs to follow them. So just don't, and continue to reject that.
If it's important, you'll find out thro
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Michael Wolf wrote:
> I don't know about anyone else -- but I also don't follow URLs hidden
> behind link shortening services. What's wrong with using the actual URL
> so people can see where they're going?
These people think all of life is a text message and, ju
On 10/15/2013 7:05 PM, krishna e bera wrote:
> On 13-10-15 10:29 AM, Jon wrote:
>> Another article from the Washington Post may be interested in.
>>
>> *http://tinyurl.com/lcdas97
>
> Please make your emails worthwhile to read and useful to index, by
> providing a sentence in your own words saying
On 13-10-15 10:29 AM, Jon wrote:
> Another article from the Washington Post may be interested in.
>
> *http://tinyurl.com/lcdas97
Please make your emails worthwhile to read and useful to index, by
providing a sentence in your own words saying what the link you are
forwarding means. Failing that
Another article from the Washington Post may be interested in.
*http://tinyurl.com/lcdas97
*
*
*
*Jon
*
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
26 matches
Mail list logo
