On 7/10/2014 1:51 PM, MacLemon wrote:
Hoi!
On 10 Jul 2014, at 16:18, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
* It's also not clear (to me) whether some of the references are actual,
official *legal* opinions / rulings, or just commentaries.
Clarification added to the cited links
Thank you. These links may be
Hoi!
On 10 Jul 2014, at 16:18, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> * It's also not clear (to me) whether some of the references are actual,
> official *legal* opinions / rulings, or just commentaries.
Clarification added to the cited links
>> 1)
>> http://futurezone.at/netzpolitik/tor-prozess-du-kannst-kinde
On 7/9/2014 4:38 PM, no.thing_to-h...@cryptopathie.eu wrote:
Hi!
Thease two threads seem important to Tor... (...) - Parliamentary
inquiry about legal status of running Tor in Austria.
1)
http://futurezone.at/netzpolitik/tor-prozess-du-kannst-kinderpornos-auf-unseren-servern-hosten/74.093.52
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
> Thease two threads seem important to Tor... (...) - Parliamentary
> inquiry about legal status of running Tor in Austria.
This is NOT, I repeat, NOT a threat to Tor as misleadingly written
before on tor-relays and tor-talk. We are a constitutio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/08/2014 10:39 PM, Mirimir wrote:
> Yes, advertising. But for whom?
No idea, but it must be important enough to post a press release, all
official-like:
http://totalfratlaw.com/TORPressRelease.pdf
- --
The Doctor [412/724/301/703] [ZS]
Deve
Thease two threads seem important to Tor...
- Tor Project is sued.
- Parliamentary inquiry about legal status of running Tor in Austria.
For the former... what links are there to prior cases where
Tor Project was named defendant?
For the latter... what links are there to prior cases where using
T
On 07/09/2014 01:39 AM, Mirimir wrote:
On 07/08/2014 10:58 PM, Anders Andersson wrote:
Wait.. what..
He's suing Tor because it's possible to reach a clearnet website
through Tor2web? Talk about publicity stunt.
Yes, advertising. But for whom?
Here's an interesting tidbit. This looks like a gru
On 07/08/2014 10:58 PM, Anders Andersson wrote:
> Wait.. what..
>
> He's suing Tor because it's possible to reach a clearnet website
> through Tor2web? Talk about publicity stunt.
Yes, advertising. But for whom?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change ot
Wait.. what..
He's suing Tor because it's possible to reach a clearnet website
through Tor2web? Talk about publicity stunt.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Hi,
Lawyer Jason L. Van Dyke[1] has sued PinkMeth[2] and The Tor Project:
http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/233081133?access_key=key-WFujAqEI3BioFxNO43R3&allow_share=true&escape=false&view_mode=scroll
Furthermore, he has sent emails to the Tor2web nodes.
[1] https://twitter.com/MeanTXLawyer
[2]
10 matches
Mail list logo