which
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Hi all ! Im configuring a new debian server
Can anyone recommend a good dns server?
i Dont want to use my isp default one, i found one that sounded good when i
read about it uncensoreddns.Org.
if anyone know of a better one let me know :)
Take care
--
Sincerly Flipchan
--
tor-talk mailing
On 7/18/16, Flipchan wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a good dns server?
127.0.0.1
::1
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Have a look at the OpenNIC project.
On 07/18/2016 02:39 AM, Flipchan wrote:
> Hi all ! Im configuring a new debian server
> Can anyone recommend a good dns server?
>
>
> i Dont want to use my isp default one, i found one that sounded good when i
> read about it uncensoreddns.Org.
> if anyone
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 08:39:02AM +0200, Flipchan wrote:
> Hi all ! Im configuring a new debian server
> Can anyone recommend a good dns server?
I assume this is for a Tor relay?
> i Dont want to use my isp default one, i found one that sounded good
> when i read about it uncensoreddns.Org. i
Hello,
Am 18.07.2016 um 08:39 schrieb Flipchan:
> Can anyone recommend a good dns server?
Censurfridns Denmark: http://blog.censurfridns.dk
IPv4: 91.239.100.100 / IPv6: 2001:67c:28a4::
IPv4: 89.233.43.71 / IPv6: 2002:d596:2a92:1:71:53::
Xiala.net: https://xiala.net/services/dns.html
Hello tor-talk,
There are a lot of you with somewhat sophisticated Tor setups, so you'll know
better than a lot of the developers about this topic.
We want to drop polipo from all of the bundles. Currently it can only be found
in the "vanilla" Vidalia bundles for OSX and Windows, but it's not in
Is the only set of installers that doesn't list an OS, the one for Windows?
https://archive.torproject.org/tor-package-archive/torbrowser/3.0a4/
Is there a reason even stable Win versions never reference the OS in
file names?
Thanks.
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To
Hello!
I am looking for Tor friendly webmail operators. By this, I mean ones
that do not insist on SMS verification and do not block Tor.
I used to be happy with openmailbox.org but they now block new sign-ups
that use Tor.
I like ruggedinbox.com which is very Tor friendly but they are ofte
On 10/30/2011 05:06 PM, Erinn Clark wrote:
> Hello tor-talk,
>
> There are a lot of you with somewhat sophisticated Tor setups, so you'll know
> better than a lot of the developers about this topic.
>
I regularly use the HTTP proxy of Privoxy with wget, Firefox, python
(ooni-probe, other code),
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 05:31:34PM -0700, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> otherwise, I sometimes use a
> HTTP proxy with proxychains to prevent DNS leaky applications that have
> not and will never implement SOCKS.
This is the crux of the question: which ones? And are they applications
that we think are
On 10/30/2011 05:37 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 05:31:34PM -0700, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>> otherwise, I sometimes use a
>> HTTP proxy with proxychains to prevent DNS leaky applications that have
>> not and will never implement SOCKS.
>
> This is the crux of the question
On 31/10/11 00:06, Erinn Clark wrote:
> We want to drop polipo from all of the bundles. Currently it can only be found
> in the "vanilla" Vidalia bundles for OSX and Windows, but it's not in the
> relay/bridge/exit bundles for Windows or any of the TBBs. Users seem to think
> they need an http prox
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:35:18PM -0700, ja...@appelbaum.net wrote 2.4K bytes
in 54 lines about:
: wget is the most common example that other people use - with wget, I set
Or they could use curl. It supports socks 4a and 5.
: I wish we'd ship torsocks as part of the bundle. It helps advanced
I
On 31/10/11 23:51, and...@torproject.org wrote:
> : I wish we'd ship torsocks as part of the bundle. It helps advanced
>
> If a shipped torsocks could handle the 'socksport auto' configuration,
> even better.
Hear hear! TBB is easy to use and update, and extremely portable. But I
also use portabl
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 23:35:18 -0700
Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> On 10/30/2011 05:37 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 05:31:34PM -0700, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> >> otherwise, I sometimes use a
> >> HTTP proxy with proxychains to prevent DNS leaky applications that have
> >> not
I have a small site. Smaller than 1M if zipped. It is static. And it
probably won't get much traffic. So 20Gb storage and 200Gb bandwidth are
pointless in my case. I would like no ads, no tracking for the reader,
faster, good uptime, and so on.
What would you recommend? What do you use? Free of co
On 10/09/2013 01:07 AM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> Is the only set of installers that doesn't list an OS, the one for Windows?
> https://archive.torproject.org/tor-package-archive/torbrowser/3.0a4/
Yes.
> Is there a reason even stable Win versions never reference the OS in
> file names?
.exe is a Wind
On 10/8/2013 6:13 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
Is there a reason even stable Win versions never reference the OS in
file names?
.exe is a Windows(-only) extension. I agree that the OS could be added
to the file name to avoid confusion.
Thanks, but a question / comment.
Except in this case, the file
On 10/09/2013 06:24 AM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> Except in this case, the file / package isn't an executable - it's a
> compressed archive. The "exe" may be used here to indicate a Windows
> build, but it's just a zipped (.7z) file.
It may contain a .7z archive and you may be able to open it using 7
09.10.2013 06:24, Joe Btfsplk:
> On 10/8/2013 6:13 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
>>> Is there a reason even stable Win versions never reference the OS in
>>> file names?
>> .exe is a Windows(-only) extension. I agree that the OS could be added
>> to the file name to avoid confusion.
>>
> Thanks, but a qu
On 13-10-09 04:00 AM, Sebastian G. wrote:
> 09.10.2013 06:24, Joe Btfsplk:
>> On 10/8/2013 6:13 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
Is there a reason even stable Win versions never reference the OS in
file names?
>>> .exe is a Windows(-only) extension. I agree that the OS could be added
>>> to the f
Try http://mailbox.org. They have an exit node, too. They acccept bitcoin.
2016-02-05 13:09 GMT+01:00 :
> Hello!
>
> I am looking for Tor friendly webmail operators. By this, I mean ones that
> do not insist on SMS verification and do not block Tor.
>
> I used to be happy with openmailbox.org but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
bitmessage.ch is a good choice.
Am 05. Februar 2016 13:09:40 MEZ, schrieb blo...@openmailbox.org:
>Hello!
>
>I am looking for Tor friendly webmail operators. By this, I mean ones
>that do not insist on SMS verification and do not block Tor.
>
>I use
Elrippo:
> bitmessage.ch is a good choice.
It requires an existing email address during registration - I wouldn't
call that 'good choice'.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go
Dont forget to encrypt all ur emails with pgp, i have looked at milter filter
for email thats auto encrypts all incoming emails which is cool
blo...@openmailbox.org skrev: (5 februari 2016 13:09:40 CET)
>Hello!
>
>I am looking for Tor friendly webmail operators. By this, I mean ones
>that do not
Well, you have four choices
1.) Setup your own domain with an Email server under your own control.
2.) Use a free Email Service with a "backup" email account, which is in common
use.
3.) Get an Email Account at a paid service, where you are also offered a
"backup" Email Account.
4.) Do not use E
I use Protonmail and that has been no problem at any point with Tor or
anything else. I'm not even sure if you need to enter any information more
than name to register.
But do check for yourselves. It has been a while since I registered
On 9 February 2016 at 15:57, elrippo wrote:
> Well, you hav
https://user.riseup.net/forms/new_user/first
- works with Tor
- does not require alternate email or phone
- does not tolerate spamming
- supports StartTLS
- does not send or log ip addresses
- requests donations, bitcoin accepted
more info:
https://help.riseup.net/email
On 02/09/2016 01:15 PM, D
On 02/09/2016 01:40 PM, krishna e bera wrote:
> https://user.riseup.net/forms/new_user/first
> - works with Tor
> - does not require alternate email or phone
> - does not tolerate spamming
> - supports StartTLS
> - does not send or log ip addresses
> - requests donations, bitcoin accepted
>
> more
Please see below for a couple of questions. Thanks for your input.
Sigaint.org is an excellent option. Their onion mailservers peer with
some of the other onion mailservers. And they have a clearnet gateway,
unlike many of the other other onion mailservers. But users can only
access their onio
> Please see below for a couple of questions. Thanks for your input.
>
>> Sigaint.org is an excellent option. Their onion mailservers peer with
>> some of the other onion mailservers. And they have a clearnet gateway,
>> unlike many of the other other onion mailservers. But users can only
>> access
What do you mean by these 30 onion mailservers.
He means "OnionMail": http:// en.onionmail .info/directory.html
Presumably they are
.onion webmail providers? Are they public? Can anyone use them?
They are mail servers running behind onion services. Not necessarily
"web".
Thank you for
n 7/5/14, Red Sonja wrote:
> I have a small site. Smaller than 1M if zipped. It is static. And it
> probably won't get much traffic. So 20Gb storage and 200Gb bandwidth are
> pointless in my case. I would like no ads, no tracking for the reader,
> faster, good uptime, and so on.
>
> What would you
Can anyone suggest a reputable webmail provider that is not totally
anti-Tor.
Cock.li and Sigaint and Unseen.is and Mail2Tor are out as the names look
weird to "normal" people.
Ruggedinbox is unreliable as the site is often down. VFEmail used to
work but I can't seem to sign-up now.
Proton
Hi,
Tails currently supports regular bridges, obfs2 and obfs3.
Work is in progress to support scramblesuit.
I see that Tor Browser 4.5 ships flashproxy, meek and obfs4.
Assuming an ideal world in which they involve an equal amount of work,
among scramblesuit, meek, flashproxy and obfs4, which one
Give runbox a try. Works fine for me, and they are based in Norway.
On 5/25/16 3:55 PM, blo...@openmailbox.org wrote:
Can anyone suggest a reputable webmail provider that is not totally
anti-Tor.
Cock.li and Sigaint and Unseen.is and Mail2Tor are out as the names
look weird to "normal" people
You might try runbox. Works fine for me.
> On May 25, 2016, at 3:55 PM, blo...@openmailbox.org wrote:
>
> Can anyone suggest a reputable webmail provider that is not totally anti-Tor.
>
> Cock.li and Sigaint and Unseen.is and Mail2Tor are out as the names look
> weird to "normal" people.
>
>
On 5/25/16, blo...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> Can anyone suggest a reputable webmail provider that is not totally
> anti-Tor.
Are you, and other readers of this thread,
willing to pay anonymously via bitcoin or
cash in the mail?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscri
blo...@openmailbox.org wrote:
Can anyone suggest a reputable webmail provider that is not totally
anti-Tor.
I've had a good experience with Autistici/Inventati -- which is a
small Italian co-op similar to RiseUp. MayFirst/PeopleLink and Electric
Embers are also great co-ops that are fine w
mailbox.org is nice, accepts cash via mail, and actively supports Tor by
running an exit node in their infrastructure and providing onion
services.
Sincerely,
Malte
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.or
I use riseup.net and can recommend that, i use to use hushmail but u know^^
blo...@openmailbox.org skrev: (25 maj 2016 21:55:15 CEST)
>Can anyone suggest a reputable webmail provider that is not totally
>anti-Tor.
>
>Cock.li and Sigaint and Unseen.is and Mail2Tor are out as the names
>look
>weir
VFEMail login works, the problem is that their free tier mail sometimes
observes massive delays in delivery. They even have a hidden service to
check your mail in the browser.
blo...@openmailbox.org:
> Can anyone suggest a reputable webmail provider that is not totally
> anti-Tor.
>
> Cock.li and
On 2016-05-26 04:46, grarpamp wrote:
On 5/25/16, blo...@openmailbox.org wrote:
Can anyone suggest a reputable webmail provider that is not totally
anti-Tor.
Are you, and other readers of this thread,
willing to pay anonymously via bitcoin or
cash in the mail?
I personally have no problem wi
On 2016-05-26(04:42:20-0400), Griffin Boyce wrote:
> blo...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> > Can anyone suggest a reputable webmail provider that is not totally
> > anti-Tor.
>
>I've had a good experience with Autistici/Inventati -- which is a
> small Italian co-op similar to RiseUp. MayFirst/People
On 6/3/16, Katya Titov wrote:
Yandex was very aggressive with their outbound spam
filtering, so ability to reliably send messages became
very annoying, with no way to disable / train it.
Has yandex corrected this problem?
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe o
blo...@openmailbox.org:
> Can anyone suggest a reputable webmail provider that is not totally
> anti-Tor.
>
> Cock.li and Sigaint and Unseen.is and Mail2Tor are out as the names
> look weird to "normal" people.
>
> Ruggedinbox is unreliable as the site is often down. VFEmail used to
> work but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 6/3/2016 9:39 AM, Katya Titov wrote:
> blo...@openmailbox.org:
>> Can anyone suggest a reputable webmail provider that is not
>> totally anti-Tor.
>>
>> Cock.li and Sigaint and Unseen.is and Mail2Tor are out as the
>> names look weird to "normal"
grarpamp:
> Yandex was very aggressive with their outbound spam
> filtering, so ability to reliably send messages became
> very annoying, with no way to disable / train it.
>
> Has yandex corrected this problem?
I've never had any issues.
--
kat
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torpro
Autistici got lots of domain names to Choice thats cool
ng0 skrev: (27 maj 2016 14:21:35 CEST)
>On 2016-05-26(04:42:20-0400), Griffin Boyce wrote:
>> blo...@openmailbox.org wrote:
>> > Can anyone suggest a reputable webmail provider that is not totally
>> > anti-Tor.
>>
>>I've had a good expe
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 07:55:15PM +, blo...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> Can anyone suggest a reputable webmail provider that is not totally
> anti-Tor.
I don't have a problem with yandex.ru many years.
>
> Cock.li and Sigaint and Unseen.is and Mail2Tor are out as the names look
> weird to "nor
I'm not sure about registering from Tor but Riseup.net is pretty friendly with
Tor. That being said you must have an invite or request an account. However I
will say the interface works great with Tor. I've never had an issue with them.
--
Not Friendly
> On Jun 6, 2016, at 7:45 PM, Артур Истоми
On June 6, 2016 7:47:16 PM CDT, Not Friendly wrote:
>I'm not sure about registering from Tor but Riseup.net is pretty
>friendly with Tor. That being said you must have an invite or request
>an account. However I will say the interface works great with Tor. I've
>never had an issue with them.
Yo
Anthony Papillion:
>
>
> On June 6, 2016 7:47:16 PM CDT, Not Friendly wrote:
>> I'm not sure about registering from Tor but Riseup.net is pretty
>> friendly with Tor. That being said you must have an invite or request
>> an account. However I will say the interface works great with Tor. I've
>>
I am also very happy with the webui its called roundcube n its opensource:)
Crypto skrev: (7 juni 2016 09:44:40 CEST)
>Anthony Papillion:
>>
>>
>> On June 6, 2016 7:47:16 PM CDT, Not Friendly
>wrote:
>>> I'm not sure about registering from Tor but Riseup.net is pretty
>>> friendly with Tor. Th
On Jun 7, 2016, at 3:44 AM, Crypto wrote:
>>> That being said you must have an invite or request
>>> an account.
As long as you ask nicely and aren't going to abuse the service, they shouldn't
have an objections to your request for an account
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torpro
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:44:40AM -0500, Crypto wrote:
> RiseUp actually has .onion addresses for all of their various services.
> They list them in their Help->Security section.
I don't understand why people still use mail services under
Patriot Act.. er.. I mean Freedom Act jurisdiction? It's
l
"Freedom Act jurisdiction"? I remember in 2014 the NSA monitored
Chancellor Angela Merkel:
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/germany-expected-to-open-investigation-into-nsa-spying-on-merkel-a-973326.html
It would be nice if you could recommend something.
Answering the topic, Riseup i
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 03:40:37PM +0200, carlo von lynX wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:44:40AM -0500, Crypto wrote:
> > RiseUp actually has .onion addresses for all of their various services.
> > They list them in their Help->Security section.
>
> I don't understand why people still use mail
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 01:58:59PM +, df. wrote:
>
> "Freedom Act jurisdiction"? I remember in 2014 the NSA monitored
> Chancellor Angela Merkel:
>
> http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/germany-expected-to-open-investigation-into-nsa-spying-on-merkel-a-973326.html
One thing is the d
carlo von lynX:
> One thing is the dragnet mass surveillance that feeds into
> XKEYSCORE for free. Hosting your mail at riseup or gmail means the
> contents or the fact you've been using crypto with somebody will
> get indexed for later use anytime in your life.
Well yeah assuming I am careless a
On 2016-06-08(06:54:36+), df. wrote:
>
> carlo von lynX:
> > One thing is the dragnet mass surveillance that feeds into
> > XKEYSCORE for free. Hosting your mail at riseup or gmail means the
> > contents or the fact you've been using crypto with somebody will
> > get indexed for later use anyti
hi there,
missing from the thread, I'd rather include it as a reference
http://onionmail.info
mostly in Italian (idea was born at hackmeeting.org)
as of today counts on 33 servers with approx 15.000 users
(I'm not part of this project, just sayin')
ciao
--
~.,_ Denis Roio aka Jarom
On 5/25/2016 2:55 PM, blo...@openmailbox.org wrote:
Can anyone suggest a reputable webmail provider that is not totally
anti-Tor.
Cock.li and Sigaint and Unseen.is and Mail2Tor are out as the names look
weird to "normal" people.
Unseen.is - is "weird" to people? What's so weird? I've used it a
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:26:12PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Assuming an ideal world in which they involve an equal amount of work,
> among scramblesuit, meek, flashproxy and obfs4, which ones should we
> prioritize our efforts on?
You shouldn't prioritise ScrambleSuit because it's superseded by o
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:06:01AM +0100, Philipp Winter wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:26:12PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> > Assuming an ideal world in which they involve an equal amount of work,
> > among scramblesuit, meek, flashproxy and obfs4, which ones should we
> > prioritize our efforts
Le 22/01/2015 00:36, Roger Dingledine a écrit :
(In the glorious future Flash Proxy + uProxy will use WebRTC transport
and be an unstoppable force for good, or something like that, but we
don't live in that future yet.)
In the context of Peersm I am giving some thoughts that it can not be,
bu
Thanks for the input!
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Hello list/George,
one runs a "normal" bridge and wants to turn it into an (py)obfsproxy
bridge, while using Windows.
By using the file from the alpha Pluggable Transports Bundle (\Data\)
one can do that.
I copied the content of \Data\ to another folder and removed the files
that are already pro
This is a not a completely technical discussion but I think it helps to get a
clear picture and ultimately one can know (or atleast try to know) which
companies/individuals may gather personal data and then one can make decisions
accordingly.
(I have listed a hardware or software and the next
70 matches
Mail list logo
