Re: [tor-talk] Police arrest

On 8/7/2014 10:21 AM, krishna e bera wrote: On 14-08-07 11:06 AM, mick wrote: This is worrying. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/08/07/london_cops_close_down_site_arrest_suspect/ If this reporting is accurate, it implies that UK City of London Police may be co-operating with copyright

Re: [tor-talk] Help with Default Browser

On 8/7/2014 2:41 PM, RD wrote: Hello Joe,Thursday, August 7, 2014, 12:38:51 AM, you wrote: Because, the displayed name or even URL in the email body may be *completely* different from the actual URL in the message header (message source) that opens, once clicked. In my example, I needed to

Re: [tor-talk] Craigslist now blocking all Tor IPs? Template for anyone:

On 8/7/2014 12:57 PM, Mirimir wrote: On 08/07/2014 11:20 AM, bm-2ctjsegdfzqngqwuqjswro6jrwlc9b3...@bitmessage.ch wrote: The automated messages from Craiglist appear like this: This IP has been automatically blocked. If you have questions, please email: blocks-b1406984946068...@craigslist.org

Re: [tor-talk] Craigslist now blocking all Tor IPs? bad people use Tor

On 8/8/2014 3:39 AM, Öyvind Saether wrote: Most users have seen sites refuse to allow connections from a specific Tor IPa. Sometimes they state the reason as being the specific IPa on a blacklist. Often, if you force a new exit relay in TBB, then you can connect to the site. So what happens to

Re: [tor-talk] Police arrest

(Я думаю все и так знают недавние события с легализацией биткойна, поэтому пересказывать не буду) Vladimir Нет, Нет, Нет. The letters are upside down backwards. :) Like the 'Я' should be 'R' and 'и' should be 'N.' But some look OK. Perhaps a problem with dyslexia. -- tor-talk mailing list -

Re: [tor-talk] Police arrest

On 8/11/2014 10:06 AM, mick wrote: On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 12:01:28 -0600 Mirimir miri...@riseup.net allegedly wrote: On 08/07/2014 11:47 AM, Joe Btfsplk wrote: The UK isn't big on freedom. Just a sayin' ;) Sadly that is true. What the UK /is/ seemingly big on though is apathy. Witness

Re: [tor-talk] TOR tried to take a snapshot of my screen

On 8/22/2014 5:16 PM, no.thing_to-h...@cryptopathie.eu wrote: One of us downloaded a wrong Tor installer package ... Best regards Anton Please expand on the possibilities beyond the face value statement. That is, assuming the OP downloaded the Tor software from the legitimate TorProject

[tor-talk] TBB 3.6.5 not on download site?

Tor Weekly News, September 3rd, 2014 - mentions Tor Browser 3.6.5 and 4.0-alpha-2 are out. But the download site https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser.html has only 3.6.4. 4.0-alpha-1. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings

Re: [tor-talk] TBB 3.6.5 not on download site?

On 9/3/2014 10:22 AM, harmony wrote: On 2014-09-03 14:57, Joe Btfsplk wrote: Tor Weekly News, September 3rd, 2014 - mentions Tor Browser 3.6.5 and 4.0-alpha-2 are out. But the download site https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser.html has only 3.6.4. 4.0-alpha-1. After members

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Browser Bundle 3.6.3: bad start

On 9/7/2014 5:36 AM, Geoff Down wrote: Same problem on Win7 with 3.6.5 - browser sometimes fails to open. On Sun, Sep 7, 2014, at 08:51 AM, Hartmut Haase wrote: Hi, sometimes when I try to start Tor, firefox will also be started, but there is no Tor Browser-window. I have to start several

[tor-talk] more sites requiring captchas from Cloudfare (using Google API?)

Using TBB, I've noticed a LOT more captchas in the last couple months - just to view the front page, or see the page linked from a search through StartPage or Ixquick. Some of the same sites presenting captchas in TBB, I tested in Firefox (31, 32) did not get a captcha. But, I didn't repeat

Re: [tor-talk] more sites requiring captchas from Cloudfare (using Google API?)

On 9/15/2014 4:16 PM, Mike Perry wrote: Öyvind Saether: These captchas recently started appearing (more often) on all kinds of sites. By far the most common name that pops up associated with this security is Cloudfare, but also some others. Aside from being forced to allow scripts in

Re: [tor-talk] more sites requiring captchas from Cloudfare (using Google API?)

On 9/16/2014 12:13 AM, isis wrote: +1 However, I don't know of a competitor to Cloudflare who privides *free* (as in beer) (D)DoS-protection via reverse webproxies, not to mention all the other bells and whistles which Cloudflare offers. It'll be hard to make the argument to switch for

Re: [tor-talk] Comcast looking for Tor traffic, contacting customers to threaten termination of service.

On 9/15/2014 10:09 PM, Juan wrote: Comcast doesn’t monitor our customer’s browser software, web surfing or online history. WHAHAHAHHA Just how fucking stupid all those people are. Only persons that haven't read actual news reports, from reputable journalists - in the last 10+ years would

Re: [tor-talk] Torrentfreak and Cloudflare

On 9/18/2014 6:17 PM, Rick wrote: On 09/18/2014 04:48 PM, grarpamp wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Grace H. gr...@mail2tor.com wrote: I just visited Cloudflare, pulled some handles and flipped a few switches. For purposes of the Tor wiki, etc.. documenting any available controls

[tor-talk] TBB not caching ahead on Youtube

Using TBB 3.6.5 in Vista x64. Also have Fx 32.0.2 on same machine. In regular Fx, a vid like J. Timberlake - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsNav3QgOzo will cache WAY ahead of play. In TBB, caching many videos barely keeps up, so videos often stutter. Both TBB Firefox are playing in HTML5.

Re: [tor-talk] Fwd: IP Banned for running a non-exit relay from home?

On 9/30/2014 7:27 PM, stn wrote: some weeks ago i asked daniel why he blocked tor traffic. he sited SSH brute force, smtp and other abuse issues. he's a sysadmin so i can understand the need to protect his networks. thanks for brining in a higher resolution view here. hope your approach

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Weekly News — October 15th, 2014

For general principle, I always thought it was a little strange that Tor changed circuits every 10 minutes. That it was too predictable, like a patrol car driving by the bank exactly at the beginning of the hour. Never deviating. There may not be any current, known exploits of this in Tor, but

Re: [tor-talk] Tor - VPN Clarification

Thanks again. On 2/1/2015 6:09 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: If you don't feel competent setting up sshd and ssh tunneling say, or managing the security updates for your own virtual private server, or customizing your firewall and TOR configuration so you are certain about what's travelling

Re: [tor-talk] Fox News bans my Tor Browser

On 1/17/2015 3:41 PM, l.m wrote: Joe Btfsplk wrote: Just one example: Say, https://ixquick.com/ (or Startpage), requires a captcha. Getting a new identity *often* doesn't remove the captcha requirement - but sometimes does. I started looking at possible reasons why. From what I've seen

Re: [tor-talk] Fox News bans my Tor Browser

On 1/16/2015 5:41 AM, Rocky_Tor wrote: It might be the changing exit node from new identity. I did try changing identities. After numerous tries, I was successful onto FoxNews. Then shortly that too changed and I was backed to being blocked. For me, TBB is sometimes blocked on sites where

Re: [tor-talk] Tor - VPN Clarification

On 2/1/2015 4:11 AM, Bill Berry wrote: My take (on his take :) ) was that; a) trusting a VPN for security is a bad idea because no VPN operator is going to go to jail for you (see HideMyAss and Sabu etc) More details about the reference to HideMyAss Sabu, Re: them not going to jail for users?

Re: [tor-talk] Tor - VPN Clarification

On 2/1/2015 3:51 PM, l.m wrote: Now I'm not saying either is better [Case 1, Tor connect to a VPN; Case 2, VPN connect to Tor] but I prefer the one with more variables in my favor. --leeroy Thanks. I read Case 1 2 - couple times (need a few more). I gather the one with more variables in my

Re: [tor-talk] Tor - VPN Clarification

On 2/1/2015 4:17 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: Good luck, Zenaan Thanks Zenaan, for detailed reply. Knowing that this is only a mailing list - not a Tor or VPN wiki, your diagrams scenarios further show (to me) how complex these issues are. In spite of your some others' excellent attempts,

Re: [tor-talk] REAL-ID Internet Access Coming Soon

On 2/10/2015 10:02 AM, Seth wrote: On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 03:33:27 -0800, Lara lara@emails.veryspeedy.net wrote: grarpamp: The NRA is 3.5M - 5.0M members strong. They turn $250M/yr from that base (manufacturers too). They have little difference of opinion in their ranks. They are good at

Re: [tor-talk] TBB visited links color

released used essentially tried to map your browser history out by including a huge number of links and then checking what colour they were - http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/12/03/browser_history_sniffing/ On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Joe Btfsplk joebtfs...@gmx.com wrote: Visited links

Re: [tor-talk] REAL-ID Internet Access Coming Soon

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 7:07 PM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2476275,00.asp ...you will very soon be kissing any rights to freedom and self managed privacy you now enjoy on the internet goodbye forever. I'm not, but some would say that LEAs gov'ts

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Exit Operator convicted in Austrian lower court

On 7/4/2014 11:37 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote: I will pick up this thread only after we have seen a written statement by the court. Anyone (not just Moritz) know what ever happened in this court case? Was prosecution dropped? A legal opinion (verdict) reached? -- tor-talk mailing list -

Re: [tor-talk] Invaded by disconnect.me

On 6/1/2015 4:31 AM, Mirimir wrote: Looking in Tor browser 4.5.1, I see that the disconnect search add-on is not installed. And so there's presumably far less of an issue. I should have checked before replying. But official clarification would still be good. The addon may not be installed in

Re: [tor-talk] Invaded by disconnect.me

Don't know much about Disconnect, except what their Privacy Policy states. (and that they are a U.S. company?) https://disconnect.me/privacy 3. We share your personal info only when legally required, or when reasonably necessary to prevent harm in an emergency situation. 4. We retain your

Re: [tor-talk] Invaded by disconnect.me

On 6/6/2015 8:56 AM, Артур Истомин wrote: On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 09:06:32PM -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote: Don't know much about Disconnect, except what their Privacy Policy states. (and that they are a U.S. company?) https://disconnect.me/privacy 3. We share your personal info only when legally

Re: [tor-talk] do Cloudfare captchas ever work?

On 6/23/2015 4:04 AM, kleft wrote: mansour moufid wrote: Sometimes I wonder if it's really Cloudflare, or some bad exit node running a CAPTCHA solving business. Mansour, to what end would they run a captcha solving business? If they were, I don't understand how they'd benefit. It's useful

Re: [tor-talk] do Cloudfare captchas ever work?

Thanks for the helpful replies. On 6/22/2015 9:36 AM, Çağıl P. Şesto wrote: A cdn like clouldflare can track you very easy over various exits, tor currently has 1115 relays that are exits, its possible to mark all of them malicious on a blacklist-providers sensor in 15-30 minutes. Is that

[tor-talk] do Cloudfare captchas ever work?

Does anyone have any meaningful success rate with Cloudfare captchas in Tor Browser? Using default browser installation settings? I so rarely have success, that I immediately close tabs for sites presenting Cloudfare. Even when the puzzle is clearly legible (rarely), it still doesn't work.

Re: [tor-talk] (no subject)

On 6/19/2015 4:17 AM, Andy Iwanski wrote: Can someone please help me. I have lost access to all my files. I do not understand any of this and need to access my stuff. I can be reached at XXX-XXX-. I tried following the directions but it didn't work. Also, it's a bad idea to post

Re: [tor-talk] do Cloudfare captchas ever work?

On 06/20/2015 12:31 AM, Andreas Krey wrote: The last weeks I was usually getting the number photo captchas, and they work. Last week there were more of the hard two word captchas, but even these usually work - sometimes I just reload the page and then I often get a number captcha. Thanks. Yes,

Re: [tor-talk] do Cloudfare captchas ever work?

, or) that Cloudfare requires to be allowed, before they'll allow the captcha to work. On 6/20/2015 6:35 AM, Lars Luthman wrote: On Fri, 2015-06-19 at 22:38 -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote: Does anyone have any meaningful success rate with Cloudfare captchas in Tor Browser? Using default browser installation

Re: [tor-talk] do Cloudfare captchas ever work?

button https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser/design/#new-identity On 6/23/2015 3:41 PM, Çağıl P. Şesto wrote: On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 07:15:24PM -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote: Is that actually true? (they can track you over various exits) Is that what the design document says? Tor can't

Re: [tor-talk] Tor browser won't become the standard one...

Pardon me if I missed some comments I'm rehashing. I'm not too familiar w/ how W10 has changed doing some things. But, sounds like you have 2 (really separate) issues / needs: 1) setting * some * browser as default in Windows 2) setting which application will auto open specific types of files,

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Browser does not recommend the default window size anymore?

On 9/14/2015 2:56 AM, Georg Koppen wrote: Qaz: Hi, I noticed that I don't get the `we recommend you leave your window size with the default` prompt when I fullscreen my window. Has it been fixed or something? The alpha version does not have it anymore and you should only see it three times

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Browser does not recommend the default window size anymore?

On 9/17/2015 12:12 AM, Dave Warren wrote: You're not wrong, but at the same time, annoying experienced users who understand (and don't care about) the consequences isn't necessarily useful either. I don't have the answer. Just thinking out loud. e.g., when less experienced users don't

[tor-talk] youtube required scripts_now

Is there a specific set of scripts now required to play youtube vids in TBB - & the other aren't needed? Not long ago, the only scripts required on youtube for TBB or Firefox seemed to be youtube.com & s.ytimg.com. I get mixed results by trying to test which ones are now required or not.

Re: [tor-talk] 2 hop mode for people that only want to use Tor for censorship circumvention to conserve bandwidth and decrease latency?

On 6/12/2016 4:32 PM, T F wrote: Create an Exit Node on your Own IP Adresse. Now any Traffic that is produced on your IP could be done from anyone else. So this could be the best case for you. You surf over the IP of an Tor Exit no latency no Traffic lost! Am 12.06.2016 9:56 nachm. schrieb "gdfg

Re: [tor-talk] 2 hop mode for people that only want to use Tor for censorship circumvention to conserve bandwidth and decrease latency?

On 6/13/2016 2:08 AM, Ben Tasker wrote: And how (many, not all) people tend to believe the worst about most accused persons, regardless of the lack of or thinness of evidence, much less waiting for any legal process? An interesting but not necessarily admirable human trait. If the accused is

Re: [tor-talk] Which reputable webmail providers function well with Tor?

On 5/25/2016 2:55 PM, blo...@openmailbox.org wrote: Can anyone suggest a reputable webmail provider that is not totally anti-Tor. Cock.li and Sigaint and Unseen.is and Mail2Tor are out as the names look weird to "normal" people. Unseen.is - is "weird" to people? What's so weird? I've used it

Re: [tor-talk] Reminder to stay on-topic

Not taking sides - at all, but when a (some?) female Tor Project employees were being harassed, there was massive, ongoing outpouring of support & long, repetitious posts. Which is fine, but it definitely wasn't on topic. I agree w/ you in general about staying on topic, but when has that ever

Re: [tor-talk] Question for those who say "Tor is pwned"

On 6/20/2016 7:10 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote: If you want to read a lot more on this topic -- including how Tor's design changed in response and how it still needs to change -- check out the blog post here: https://blog.torproject.org/blog/improving-tors-anonymity-changing-guard-parameters

Re: [tor-talk] Day of Action: Is the FBI targeting YOU??

On 6/21/2016 11:58 AM, Kate Krauss wrote: Greetings, Tor Talkers! The US Department of Justice is trying to institute new rules that would let the FBI hack computers that use Tor and other privacy-protecting technologies--all over the world. EFF and Tor are asking you to sign a petition or (if

Re: [tor-talk] US Federal Court: The Fourth Amendment Does Not Protect Your Home Computer

Seems that saying "the decision is bad news for privacy" is an historical understatement. It's more like burning the Constitution & shooting the ashes out of the solar system. "We don't need no stinking warrant." I have doubts that sending scolding emails or petitions will in any way change

Re: [tor-talk] US Federal Court: The Fourth Amendment Does Not Protect Your Home Computer

On 6/24/2016 8:08 AM, I wrote: Is this list for all Tor people or just USA? Subject: Re: [tor-talk] US Federal Court: The Fourth Amendment Does Not Protect Your Home Computer Is that a serious or satirical question? It's always been for people of all countries, as far as I remember. If

[tor-talk] good ole cloudflarb

Tor Weekly news from April 4, 2016 mentioned Cloudflare's blog comment on Tor. A cookie exception IS set ( but "accept cookies from sites" is not checked & "accept 3rd party cookies" = never) - which allows other sites to set session cookie, if an exception is entered. That setup allows

Re: [tor-talk] What is "cookie protections"?

On 1/8/2016 3:17 PM, Yury Bulka wrote: I've disabled the "Don't record browsing history or website data" check box in the Privacy and Security Settings dialog. There's only one potential danger I see here - cookies. In Windows TBB, there's a selection "Use custom settings for history." The

Re: [tor-talk] US Federal Court: The Fourth Amendment Does Not Protect Your Home Computer

On 6/24/2016 4:26 PM, I wrote: " foreign law" QED Yes - most lands & their laws, other than the one a person grew up in or resides in are "foreign" to them. It's not a slur. :D -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to

Re: [tor-talk] CloudFlare blog post

On 3/30/2016 10:01 AM, Philipp Winter wrote: I also wonder how effective your CAPTCHAs really are. Deep learning techniques suggest that bots are about to become just as good, or even better, at solving CAPTCHAs than people. Therefore, I wonder if a long term solution should also center around

Re: [tor-talk] web browser add-on extensions vulnerabilities

On 4/10/2016 5:36 AM, jb wrote: Tor Browser users: NoScript and other popular Firefox add-ons open millions to new attack http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/04/noscript-and-other-popular-firefox-add-ons-open-millions-to-new-attack/ TB supplies default extensions, from which two are TB

Re: [tor-talk] Why my tor-assigned IP address differs from that of exit node ?

On 3/16/2016 11:13 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote: It's nothing to worry about, and also not a bug. You might enjoy this stackexchange article which explains the topic: http://tor.stackexchange.com/questions/190/why-does-check-torproject-org-sometimes-tell-me-im-not-using-tor-when-i-am In TBB

Re: [tor-talk] Question about Circuit Separation

On 3/10/2016 6:00 AM, CANNON NATHANIEL CIOTA wrote: This is a question about Tor Browser in specific. I've found a number of websites [0] [1] [2] that explicitly warn of visiting your personal website over tor. The explanation is always that if you "access other sites in the same session", an

Re: [tor-talk] Why my tor-assigned IP address differs from that of exit node ?

On 3/19/2016 4:48 PM, grarpamp wrote: On 3/19/16, Joe Btfsplk <joebtfs...@gmx.com> wrote: In TBB 5.5.4, why does part of the URL that's copied / pasted, look so pale gray after loading, it's almost unreadable? Go to about:config search url / urlbar. Thank you. The pref

[tor-talk] Start Page & Ixquick - same now

"On March 29, Ixquick merged with our hugely popular StartPage search engine." https://ixquick.com/eng/ixquick-merged-with-startpage.html?lmv=1 This is apparently for the US. Best I could tell, in the - US -, Ixquick.com & Startpage give same results - querying Google. Seems ? the _USA

Re: [tor-talk] CloudFlare blog post

On 4/1/2016 1:56 PM, The Doctor wrote: If I run into the CAPTCHA wall on a site, I generally have to solve it three or four times before I can get through. I generally just chew it back because that seems to be the toll that has to be paid these days. I generally don't have the same problem

Re: [tor-talk] CloudFlare blog post

On 3/31/2016 12:25 AM, Andreas Krey wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 15:19:09 +, Joe Btfsplk wrote: ... At times, Cloudflare or some sites may say, "Gee, whiz - we're not blocking TBB intentionally. We're working on a solution." But I don't buy that 100%. It's possibly just a p

Re: [tor-talk] CloudFlare blog post

On 3/31/2016 1:04 PM, Andreas Krey wrote: On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:27:24 +, Joe Btfsplk wrote: ... They said that automatically providing cloudflared sites with onion addresses would make it easier to detect nonmalicious tor use, but I wonder why they expect that the bad guys don't

Re: [tor-talk] CloudFlare blog post - Addendum

On 3/31/2016 7:34 PM, tor_t...@arcor.de wrote: Hi Tor Talkers, there is someone who wants to make us believe that the FBI is seeking a backdoor in Tor via CF like the PR we read with Apple and he posted his thoughts to pastebin at #OPTor: http://pastebin.com/mucmvJCN ~1.200 hits and trendy

Re: [tor-talk] CloudFlare blog post - Addendum

On 3/31/2016 11:23 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote: On 3/31/2016 7:34 PM, tor_t...@arcor.de wrote: Hi Tor Talkers, there is someone who wants to make us believe that the FBI is seeking a backdoor in Tor via CF like the PR we read with Apple and he posted his thoughts to pastebin at #OPTor: http

Re: [tor-talk] Tor Friendly Emial Services.

On 2/16/2016 10:14 AM, blo...@openmailbox.org wrote: Hello, Here are some Tor friendly e-mail providers. None of these want SMS validation. Some have onion links but please check yourself for the correct URL. Do you know of any we can add to this list? Any onion only sites? Any comments on

Re: [tor-talk] 12.7 percent of the domains I visit are intercepted by CloudFlare

On 4/23/2016 8:15 AM, Rob van der Hoeven wrote: Hi, Today I got an idea of how to measure "The CloudFlare problem". It turns out that every time you visit a website that's behind CloudFlare a cookie is set with the name __cfduid If you use Firefox these cookies end up in a SQLite database

Re: [tor-talk] 12.7 percent of the domains I visit are intercepted by CloudFlare

On 4/23/2016 2:54 PM, Rob van der Hoeven wrote: On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 14:03 -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote: On 4/23/2016 8:15 AM, Rob van der Hoeven wrote: Hi, Today I got an idea of how to measure "The CloudFlare problem". It turns out that every time you visit a website that's behind

Re: [tor-talk] fwd: FBI Is Pushing Back Against Judge's Order to Reveal Tor Browser Exploit

On 5/19/2016 1:31 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: On 5/19/16, krishna e bera <k...@cyblings.on.ca> wrote: On 05/18/2016 11:40 AM, Joe Btfsplk wrote: I'm surprised there are no discussions or questions on tor-talk about this issue . Since any exploits - whether due to "flaws" i

Re: [tor-talk] FBI cracked Tor security

On 7/14/2016 1:23 AM, Jon Tullett wrote: I think what you'll find in such cases is that the FBI generally crack the servers hosting the illicit material, not Tor itself. 1. Wasn't this discussed back when it occurred? As to how they did (or likely did) identify the Tor / Tor Browser users

Re: [tor-talk] FBI cracked Tor security

On 7/14/2016 2:34 PM, Jon Tullett wrote: 2. Aren't statements (from anyone) like, "... generally crack the servers hosting the illicit material, not Tor itself," sort of a matter of semantics? Depends on the context, I guess. To the user, maybe, but in the context of this (Tor) community, the

Re: [tor-talk] Medium removed the captchas for Tor users!

On 8/8/2016 8:53 PM, Sadiq Saif wrote: On 08-Aug-16 21:42, Joe Btfsplk wrote: I still don't know what those statements were about. I've seen no change in Cloudfront captchas working better for Tor. Meaning, they don't work at all. Even major news outlets using CloudFlare, where I'd like

Re: [tor-talk] Medium removed the captchas for Tor users!

On 7/14/2016 4:49 PM, Griffin Boyce wrote: That is really awesome! :-) Thanks for the update. On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Kate Krauss < k...@torproject.org [k...@torproject.org] > wrote: I don't say much on Tor-Talk, but I will say this: Thanks, Medium, for removing all those CloudFlare

Re: [tor-talk] FBI cracked Tor security

On 7/15/2016 12:34 AM, Jon Tullett wrote: On 15 July 2016 at 01:23, Joe Btfsplk <joebtfs...@gmx.com> wrote: On 7/14/2016 2:34 PM, Jon Tullett wrote: Thanks Jon. I agree w/ most that you said. Again, semantics. Whether they cracked Tor or Tor Browser won't change if the brutal dictat

Re: [tor-talk] Medium removed the captchas for Tor users!

On 7/14/2016 4:49 PM, Griffin Boyce wrote: That is really awesome! :-) Thanks for the update. On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Kate Krauss < k...@torproject.org [k...@torproject.org] > wrote: I don't say much on Tor-Talk, but I will say this: Thanks, Medium, for removing all those CloudFlare

Re: [tor-talk] US Federal Court: The Fourth Amendment Does Not Protect Your Home Computer

On 6/24/2016 8:39 AM, Allen wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 2:19 AM, grarpamp wrote: https://www.eff.org/files/2016/06/23/matish_suppression_edva.pdf

[tor-talk] Tor segregation

Went to a site (won't list the URL because it's health related) & the short notice appeared: "Not Implemented Tor IP not allowed." They BWT'd me - browsing with Tor. However, got a new circuit & page loaded immediately. Obviously, the exit relay's IPa was blocked. The message was technically

[tor-talk] TBB 6.5 screen resize not working

With default settings, TBB 6.5 (Win) doesn't round screen sizes at all. Browserspy.dk shows 993 x 695. I see the pref "extensions.torbutton.resize_windows" is still set false by default. Toggling it to true gives different reported screen size, but not increments of 100 or 200. The pref

Re: [tor-talk] TBB 6.5 screen resize not working

Koppen wrote: Joe Btfsplk: With default settings, TBB 6.5 (Win) doesn't round screen sizes at all. Browserspy.dk shows 993 x 695. I see the pref "extensions.torbutton.resize_windows" is still set false by default. Toggling it to true gives different reported screen size, but not increme

Re: [tor-talk] bug

On 9/12/2016 9:41 AM, xuzixa...@polyfaust.com wrote: https://www.browserleaks.com/firefox it can be used for both fingerprinting (different users use different OS setups or different Tor versions) and exploiting software vulnerabilities because when attacker don’t know your OS or browser

[tor-talk] Question - NoScript ClearClick bug

#14985 new defect NoScript Clickjacking warning when clicking on embedded content This obviously hasn't

Re: [tor-talk] Metrics in Iran and other countries

On 9/7/2016 9:40 PM, Mirimir wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/07/2016 11:05 AM, Joe Btfsplk wrote: #4 The Tor Project is pretty clear that Tor Browser by itself is probably not enough to provide reasonably reliable anonymity. Tor Project doesn't make that clear

Re: [tor-talk] Tor-friendly email provider

On 9/22/2016 1:00 PM, Oskar Wendel wrote: gmx.com doesn't want me to register: "Your registration could not be processed at the moment. Please try again later." gmx.net seems to blacklist Tor, too: Registrierung leider nicht moglich! Sie haben versucht, sich mit der IP-Adresse

Re: [tor-talk] is it me or did tor talk get really quiet?

Some may say they still get several tor-talk emails / day and I do, too. But several current, relevant technical questions I've asked about Tor issues get no comments. Questions I'm pretty sure a lot of people would be interested in. And that at least some advanced users would have partial

Re: [tor-talk] Tor-friendly email provider

On 9/24/2016 8:26 AM, Mirimir wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/24/2016 06:53 AM, Oskar Wendel wrote: Joe Btfsplk: What is it about Riseup that you don't like? Just curious. I've not used it, but most people seem to like it. Riseup silently drops email with certain

Re: [tor-talk] Tor and Google error / CAPTCHAs.

On 9/25/2016 12:15 AM, Jeremy Rand wrote: hi...@safe-mail.net: You can't use Google Translate at all with most Tor exit nodes, while there are no sane reaons why they would block Tor users from just translating text. Interesting. I don't use Google Translate very often (maybe 2-3 times per

Re: [tor-talk] is it me or did tor talk get really quiet?

Thanks Moritz. Yes, the reply was helpful. Comments / follow-up inserted below. On 9/28/2016 3:01 AM, Moritz Bartl wrote: Is tor-project list not for fairly advanced users, or bug filers, or those giving more to the community than just asking questions (but never contribute useful input)?

Re: [tor-talk] is it me or did tor talk get really quiet?

agency. That's no secret to Tor Project. Just a thought. On 9/28/2016 11:46 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote: Hi Joe, I agree with what you wrote. The topic comes up at every dev meeting, but we have not found a way to address that problem, or, phrased differently, it is unclear what path to take. On 09/28/

Re: [tor-talk] problem reinstalling NoScript

On 10/4/2016 11:50 PM, krishna e bera wrote: On 04/10/16 10:03 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote: In TBB 6.0.5 (Win), NoScript 2.9.0.14 it seemed to be misbehaving. It wasn't showing many trackers in the icon drop list, on sites where there would be plenty. I UNchecked "Allow Scripts Globally

Re: [tor-talk] Tor and Google error / CAPTCHAs.

On 10/5/2016 11:23 AM, Mirimir wrote: Yes, it's partly that residential IPs are (or have been, anyway) dynamic. I guess that depends on the provider and exact type of service. AT "digital" (Uverse) residential internet hasn't had dynamic IPa's for several yrs. In many places, they

[tor-talk] problem reinstalling NoScript

In TBB 6.0.5 (Win), NoScript 2.9.0.14 it seemed to be misbehaving. It wasn't showing many trackers in the icon drop list, on sites where there would be plenty. I UNchecked "Allow Scripts Globally." I uninstalled it - closed TBB. Removed NoScript entries in pref.js & restarted TBB, then

Re: [tor-talk] Running a relay for some months

On 9/17/2016 11:23 AM, Tor Dev wrote: So the bandwidth is probably not sufficient of your relay. @ Tor Dev Just curious. I received 14 copies of your above reply with identical body text. Did you somehow send that many? Do you possibly have a virus or sticking "Send" button? :) Several

Re: [tor-talk] Running a relay for some months

On 9/17/2016 2:46 PM, Tor Dev wrote: I see now. My apologies! I pressed the button indeed multiple times, but the window with the mail didn’t close after pressing the button. Even disabling GPG signatures made no difference. After a few minutes I force quitted my mail client and went to

Re: [tor-talk] Image EXIF data used to geolocate

On 9/22/2016 9:46 AM, ban...@openmailbox.org wrote: Pretty basic opsec fail but I wonder if mapping out tags was a good idea. Imagine tagging a city that has a handful of Tor users. They should have consulted the Tor Research Ethics process. When it's important not to reveal location or other

Re: [tor-talk] Metrics in Iran and other countries

I don't know the complete answers, depending on which question, or if they even exist. Assuming the metric data are being handled correctly & graphs are displaying correctly, if we look at a graph for all users from Jan. 2013 till now, the trend is still the same. A huge increase - probably

Re: [tor-talk] is it me or did tor talk get really quiet?

On 9/26/2016 7:07 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote: On 09/26/2016 09:02 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote: Some may say they still get several tor-talk emails / day and I do, too. But several current, relevant technical questions I've asked about Tor issues get no comments. Questions I'm pretty sure a lot

Re: [tor-talk] Tor and Google error / CAPTCHAs.

On 9/26/2016 11:57 PM, Jeremy Rand wrote: If it matters, I usually have Tor Browser in Medium-High security level, so Javascript is enabled for HTTPS sites (including Google Translate). Cheers, -Jeremy Yep, mine can be in Med or Med High security, and a lot of captcha's & other features don't

Re: [tor-talk] Tor and Google error / CAPTCHAs.

On 9/27/2016 9:57 AM, blo...@openmailbox.org wrote: This is exactly my issue. If I login to my Gmail or FB account then invariably Gmail or FB thinks I am a suspicious person hence "Something seems a bit different about the way you're trying to sign in. Complete the step below to let us know

Re: [tor-talk] Tor and Google error / CAPTCHAs.

On 9/27/2016 9:02 PM, Mirimir wrote: On 09/27/2016 06:50 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote: Sometimes, they start renewing pictures in the [CAPTCHA] array that I've already checked, before I get to the end & submit. I tried doing it faster - they replaced them faster. Obvious they didn't want Tor u

Re: [tor-talk] Tor and Google error / CAPTCHAs.

On 10/3/2016 2:09 AM, Alec Muffett wrote: On 3 October 2016 at 01:40, wrote: While outreach and cooperation with some companies may work, do you not consider that a sizable number of sites will always block anonymous traffic simply because they can not monetize it with

Re: [tor-talk] How to (Was: Tor and Google error / CAPTCHAs.)

On 10/1/2016 12:36 AM, Alec Muffett wrote: …which leads the the sort of posting that Joe posts above, essentially that some evil gods named Google and Cloudflare have, do and are, arranging for the websites of the internet to be hostile to people who need or want use Tor, by throwing

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >