Re: [Fwd: RE: Date vs timestamp with Oracle]

2004-08-16 Thread Saravana Krishnan Kannan
Hi, I haven't tried to get it integrated with the main Village, but I'm definitely willing to lend them the code if they would put it along with the main Village code. As of now my patch has a lot of Oracle specific code, but that can simply set up village to call my code only if the

[Fwd: RE: Date vs timestamp with Oracle]

2004-08-16 Thread Thomas Fischer
Hi, Just tried the patch and I had problems writing a timestamp to a Oracle 9i Database. I did the following: - apply the patch to db.props from the torque-3.1-release (by the way: the patch is reversed, i.e. I had to apply the -R option for patching) - create an object with a timestamp value

Re: [Fwd: RE: Date vs timestamp with Oracle]

2004-08-16 Thread Scott Eade
Sarav, I would suggest you send a brief description of the problems your patches address to the village-dev mailing list and see if you get a response. There has been no activity on village for a very long time, but if there are legitimate problems that need to be addressed you will hopefully

Re: [Fwd: RE: Date vs timestamp with Oracle]

2004-08-16 Thread Scott Eade
Was the message you are referring to this one? http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]msgNo=4216 Scott -- Scott Eade Backstage Technologies Pty. Ltd. http://www.backstagetech.com.au Saravana Krishnan Kannan wrote: Hi Scott, I remember very well that the Date vs Timestamp had

Re: [Fwd: RE: Date vs timestamp with Oracle]

2004-08-16 Thread Scott Eade
Thomas Fischer wrote: Just tried the patch and I had problems writing a timestamp to a Oracle 9i Database. I did the following: - apply the patch to db.props from the torque-3.1-release (by the way: the patch is reversed, i.e. I had to apply the -R option for patching) Yes, that is right. - create