On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 17:29:25 -0600, Rob Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been following thread regarding using a TorqueInstance with
multiple databases, etc.
I have a similar wish and a proposed solution, if I can get the
eyes/ears of a developer.
I want to be able to use the same tables
Hi,
When I try to insert a row in a table with autoincrement id I get the
following exception:
org.apache.torque.TorqueException: IdGenerator for table 'HOSPITAL' is null
It was working before in mysql but when I moved to postgresql it is not
working anymore.
I
to do just this and submit the patches to the dev list.
Regards,
Malcolm Kendall
-Original Message-
From: Scott Eade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 January 2004 04:50
To: Apache Torque Users List
Subject: Re: Torque with more dynamic DB connections...
Rob Gordon wrote:
Will do...as you
I have been following thread regarding using a TorqueInstance with
multiple
databases, etc.
I have a similar wish and a proposed solution, if I can get the
eyes/ears of a developer.
I want to be able to use the same tables (ie Peers) across multiple
databases. It just so
happens, for a data
I see upon further investigation that the MapBuilder classes would have to
be touched also. The table-nameMapBuilder class does a call to
Torque.getDatabaseMap(hard-coded-database-name) in the doBuild
method. This is called by the BasePeer. Somehow,
the database name has to be passed down to the
Will do...as you can imagine, things are not quite always like they appear. As
I look
at it, the change touches more and more code. Not absolutely foreboding, but
bigger
than expected. As always.
You say, In the absence of any strong objections... Would that mean
existing
committers/developers
Rob Gordon wrote:
Will do...as you can imagine, things are not quite always like they appear. As
I look
at it, the change touches more and more code. Not absolutely foreboding, but
bigger
than expected. As always.
This is where feedback from someone with more experience than I would be
of
: Torque with more dynamic DB connections, avoiding singleton and
statics?
Hello,
is it possible to avoid the Torque singleton and static OM members
altogether?
I have some quite dynamic needs for my DBMS connections. In the easiest
case, it boils down to being able to specify which
://cyclops-group.sourceforge.net
-Original Message-
From: Ekkehard Kraemer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 5:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Torque with more dynamic DB connections, avoiding singleton and
statics?
Hello,
is it possible to avoid the Torque
:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Torque with more dynamic DB connections, avoiding singleton and
statics?
Hello,
is it possible to avoid the Torque singleton and static OM members
altogether?
I have some quite dynamic needs for my DBMS connections. In the easiest
case, it boils down to being
Hello,
is it possible to avoid the Torque singleton and static OM members altogether?
I have some quite dynamic needs for my DBMS connections. In the easiest case, it boils down to being able to specify which of several databases (defined in the standard Torque property file) to use during
11 matches
Mail list logo
