A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the
results, please visit http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=73380
Question: U
B1tbull wrote:
> are there other limitations for the
> tiny SBS related to the many plugin's available for the PC based SBS ?
It is reasonable to expect limitations, the Touch is pretty small, and
has limited resources. I would not expect all the plug-ins.
Some of the limitations may be lifted ov
While I was not considering the SB Touch initially, the tiny SBS feature
may justify yet another extension of the SB family.
Besides Web UI and transcoding, are there other limitations for the
tiny SBS related to the many plugin's available for the PC based SBS ?
--
B1tbull
A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the
results, please visit http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=73380
Question: U
I'm one of the beta testers and have done extensive listening to the
Touch and tried it up against several external DACs, but I don't have a
DacMagic so I can't give you the exact desired comparison.
I HAVE done a comparison with a PeachTree Nova which has a very good
sounding Sabre DAC. As compa
A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the
results, please visit http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=73380
Question: U
A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the
results, please visit http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=73380
Question: U
A poll associated with this post was created, to vote and see the
results, please visit http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=73380
Question: U
Don't forget that there are other DAC's out there.
I use one of these http://www.homehifi.co.uk/products/Caiman.html and I
am delighted with its' performance.
You can find someone else's appraisal of the same DAC compared to that
of his Transporter here
http://theartofsound.net/forum/showpost.php
My guess is that will be a considerable improvement. I didn#t check it
though ... DACMagic is a decent DAC and a toy dac implemented usually
within SB's shouldn't be able to match DACMagics performance ...
But check it first ...
--
DejanM
--
>Still, I think TinySC will be popular as main server for a lot of users
>in the mass market.
>
I don't know about TinySC, but ultimately it's good to have the choice. The
worry for me is that main server functionality will get watered down due to
TinySC requirements and lack of development reso
11 matches
Mail list logo
