Another interesting thing the Touch will do, is send a WOL (wake up on
lan) signal to the mac address of the server. The mac is a layer2
address which is set physically on the network hardware by the
manufacturer. No IP addresses (Layer3) are required for this
communication.
In my setup, I use
UV101;691734 Wrote:
. I dont believe the SB system will use names to identify devices on
the network
SB players will do this fine, assuming it is setup correctly on the
host server computer. You can even use the computer name as your
remote UI control (http://Frank:9000)
On the
Hi
My Duet sometimes behaves erratically - e.g. needs several attempts to
connect to music library (USB HD attached to Win7 netbook, running LMS
7.7.x).
Sometimes I'm uncertain as to whether it's the Controller or Receiver -
sometimes Diagnostics says everything is OK, even though the Receiver
Pardon my ignorance in ABX listening but isn't posting results going
to taint the overall test results? Example: If someone reads this
thread, sees that most hear no difference on tests 1 2, won't there
now be an expectant bias to also not hear a difference on those same
tests?
I'm no
Who knows but .
On the Touch you are able to see some diagnostic , reciever have only
the multicolr led and server or controller might not have any clue, soo
faultracing and setup i simpler .
Wifi receptions is slightly better
--
Mnyb
toby10;691753 Wrote:
Pardon my ignorance in ABX listening but isn't posting results going
to taint the overall test results? Example: If someone reads this
thread, sees that most hear no difference on tests 1 2, won't there
now be an expectant bias to also not hear a difference on
OK, I was trying not to over complicate things and so my statement is
misleading. Pretty much everything can use names (DNS, WINS NetBios
etc)
In the url you posted http://frank:9000, frank would be resolved as
the actual ip address of the server named. In order for network
communication to take
Mnyb;691754 Wrote:
Who knows but .
On the Touch you are able to see some diagnostic , reciever have only
the multicolr led and server or controller might not have any clue, soo
faultracing and setup i simpler .
Wifi receptions is slightly better
Thanks
Would I have access to full
UV101;691734 Wrote:
Another interesting thing the Touch will do, is send a WOL (wake up on
lan) signal to the mac address of the server. The mac is a layer2
address which is set physically on the network hardware by the
manufacturer. No IP addresses (Layer3) are required for this
Hi - It turns out that there was an issue with the IRBlaster Plugin (it
was cutting off commands greater than 32 bits, mine was 48 bits).
the developer kindly and promptly addressed it and IRBlaster 6.2.1 is
now available and it works with my Denon conf file!
If anyone has encountered a
I'll check mine at home later but it does sound odd!
For the WOL, you need to make sure the LMS machine is set to use WOL in
its bios you'd obviously also need the power connected :-)
--
UV101
SB3 Deep Blue screen - 2 Clocks, 3 Low noise regs, SEPC ZA caps,
External PSU 80VA, Hexfred
swayzak;691758 Wrote:
Thanks
Would I have access to full TinyLMS functions via Controller ?
Tiny would just be another server so controller would connect fine .
But if you are accustomed to the full server version you better keep
that running.
Tiny has many limitations ( there is a wiki
I have TT3.0 installed on my SBT.
Will I need to restore the factory settings to do this test?
I hope the tt -r (restoring SBT to factory settings) is enough.
Regards
Rolf
--
NoRoDa
NoRoDa's Profile:
TheOctavist;691720 Wrote:
where do I get this custom clock/VU meter??
There are two ways:
ALTERNATIVE 1: IF YOU WANT A REPLACEMENT FOR THE LOGITECH VU METER
- Install Patch Installer applet on your Touch by going to
Settings/Advanced/Applet Installer and select to install it
- After
haha! Thanks for that. I'll add it to my do-next list.
--
stereoptic
stereoptic's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=53162
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93706
toby10;691753 Wrote:
Pardon my ignorance in ABX listening but isn't posting results going
to taint the overall test results? Example: If someone reads this
thread, sees that most hear no difference on tests 1 2, won't there
now be an expectant bias to also not hear a difference on
I have no Touch but find this idea funny! What i wonder is if here is a
chance to cheat when someone knows to debug the processes and its
changes in reasltime!?
--
Wombat
Transporter (modded) - RG142 - Avantgarde Acoustic based 500VA
monoblocks - Sommer SPK240 - self-made speakers
17 matches
Mail list logo
