garym wrote:
EDO works with 7.7.2. It only needed 7.8 if your were converting your
FLAC to WAV on the server side rather than the TOUCH side. For the life
of me, I really don't understand why one would want to convert from
TOUCH USB to S/PDIF instead of using the TOUCH's S/PDIF. (by the
Triode wrote:
I've just added a new kernel and updated the output selection applet.
The new kernel includes:
- possible work around for the rDAC issue (based on my option 2, it
ignores the parameter from the dac and uses a smaller parameter - the
question is whether the dac likes this..?)
SBGK wrote:
are you aware that the spdif out can be improved by changing
clocks/capacitors and removing chips eg Fidelity Audio mods ? so that
indicates that the Touch spdif out is not perfect as seems to be the
implication.
So given that the spdif out is not perfect and can be improved
Turnandcough wrote:
I read that the Touch' USB output was better than its S/PDIF output.
I'm very curious by nature and I needed to find out for myself.
It's not night and day but I can say that adding the V-Link in the mix
HAS improved the sound somewhat. It's just a bit more rounded and
Mnyb wrote:
Async USB may be better when the DAC has the corresponding USB -input-,
but USB spdiff converter is not the same thing you have not removed
spdiff out of the picture at all , hence the whole idea seems a bit off
??
The rationale behind the existence USB/spdiff converters is to
Zombie wrote:
Anyone know if the Micromega MyDAC will work?
It has a USB 1.0 and 2.0 switch in the back...
http://www.micromega-hifi.com/index.php/en/products/my-range/mydac
Also interested in this although the MyDac is very new - by all reports
it is fantastic.
Thanks
Sam
dsdreamer wrote:
I fully agree in theory. That was what I was telling others too.
Just to reiterate, though, that all of us who have tried this combo (and
in my case, I had no expectation of improvement) found an improvement
worth keeping, or at least reported a noticeable difference in
guidof wrote:
I suspect the reported differences are system dependent. When my DAC was
a Cambridge Audio 840C I preferred the setup via a VLink II USB to SPDIF
converter. After I switched to a DSPeaker Dual Core DAC/EQ, I preferred
the straight SPDIF connection.
Guido F.
This makes a
Hi,
I'm trying to connect my SBTouch using browser
(http://192.168.1.12:9000) with success I'm having the following error :
Erreur 324 (net::ERR_EMPTY_RESPONSE) : Le serveur a mis fin à la
connexion sans envoyer de données.
My Win7 firewall is disabled so I guess its not an issue related with
Not understanding what you are attempting. Are you trying to connect
your LMS server to your Touch player by using the LMS web UI?
If yes, try connecting from the Touch itself by selecting My Music.
If you are trying to connect a web browser to the Touch directly, you
cannot do this.
toby10 wrote:
Not understanding what you are attempting. Are you trying to connect
your LMS server to your Touch player by using the LMS web UI?
If yes, try connecting from the Touch itself by selecting My Music.
If you are trying to connect a web browser to the Touch directly, you
Mnyb wrote:
Yes the tiny version of LMS that is running on a Touch does not have the
web-UI (Touch would crash from the load due to it's tiny cpu/ram )
Don't get it so what about Logitech's troubleshooting page and the
following blog
One very important thing you haven't indicated is where you are running
LMS.
The web interface you are trying to use for LMS only works if you are
running LMS on a computer, a NAS (network attached storage) or similar
_external_ device. If you are using the Touch's built-in server (also
known
sroux wrote:
Don't get it so what about Logitech's troubleshooting page and the
following blog
http://soundcheck-audio.blogspot.fr/2011/11/touch-toolbox-30.html, can't
I access the Logitech Media Server on the SBTouch? = tinySC
I'm lost here!
Without reading the many pages in that blog,
DanBa wrote:
What is the smaller parameter?
Thanks.
Apparently, the Android Linux-powered Samsung Galaxy S3 has the same
interworking issue with the CEntrance DACmini:
http://www.head-fi.org/t/595071/android-phones-and-usb-dacs/690#post_8827852
I'm not convinced this is the same thing.
toby10 wrote:
Without reading the many pages in that blog, where does it say you can
access the Touch's inbuilt server via a web browser?
I see mention of SSH, WinSCP, Putty, etc... which are not web browsers.
Correct. And one of the main principles of soundcheck's blog is that for
optimal
New User Question: Is there a simple ( low cost) way to view and
control the SBT from my listening position. The SBT Screen is too small
from my listening position. I dont have any Apple related devices so
the ipeng route is out. Any other devices I can use? Thanks
sportflyer wrote:
New User Question: Is there a simple ( low cost) way to view and
control the SBT from my listening position. The SBT Screen is too small
from my listening position. I dont have any Apple related devices so
the ipeng route is out. Any other devices I can use? Thanks
aubuti wrote:
Correct. And one of the main principles of soundcheck's blog is that for
optimal sound quality the Touch should do as little processing as
possible, which includes _not_ running the built-in LMS.
He implicitly assumes and external server as he usually also promotes
the idea of
aubuti wrote:
Correct. And one of the main principles of soundcheck's blog is that for
optimal sound quality the Touch should do as little processing as
possible, which includes _not_ running the built-in LMS.
Ok so I'm totally wrong. Thanks for making things clear.
You can use virtually any device with a web browser.
azinck3's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3967
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97005
sroux wrote:
Ok so I'm totally wrong. Thanks for making things clear.
Not totally, you got yourself a Touch :)
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread:
garym wrote:
Android tablet? What's your price range? Cheap used iPhone or iTouch?
iPods ? but don't go for to old as the app may not be suported , for
unknown reasons devs are not allowed to keep legacy versions of same
/similar app in the store , my guess is that it is about planned
azinck3 wrote:
You can use virtually any device with a web browser.
Such as a laptop or netbook computer. If using a computer you can also
use of several very good Squeezebox front end programs, such as Moose
(http://www.rusticrhino.com/drlovegrove/) or Muso
(http://klarita.net/muso.html), to
I recently bought a LG e400 andoid phone for 29 Euros. That is a perfect
value for money remote.
marlo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37542
View this thread:
Optical and coaxial work perfectly up to 24Bit 192Khz when directly
plugged in to my Rotel RA-12 amp.
marlo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37542
View this thread:
sroux wrote:
Ok so I'm totally wrong. Thanks for making things clear.
I wouldn't say that you're totally wrong, but you do seem to be working
at cross purposes if on the one hand you are (a) running the Touch's
built-in server and (b) applying some of soundcheck's mods (and you
didn't say you
I have an old laptop running Win XP . Will that do?
sportflyer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=57767
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97005
sportflyer wrote:
I have an old laptop running Win XP . Will that do?
Yep. Just install squeezeplay on the laptop. Then choose player in
squeezeplay menu and select the touch. I use this approach much of the
time. Squeezeplay is at beta downloads. Im on my phone, so someone can
post a link.
Does Squeezeplay , Moose or any Web interface degrade the quality of
the music stream to the SBT ?
sportflyer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=57767
View this thread:
sportflyer wrote:
Does Squeezeplay , Moose or any Web interface degrade the quality of
the music stream to the SBT ?
Absolutely NOT! The data is streamed for the computer running Squeezebox
server (SBS) or LMS to the Touch. All Squeezeplay, Moose or any Web
interface does is tell the
ralphpnj wrote:
Absolutely NOT! The data is streamed for the computer running Squeezebox
server (SBS) or LMS to the Touch. All Squeezeplay, Moose or any Web
interface does is tell the computer running SBS/LMS what music (data) to
stream, when to play, when to stop, when to pause, etc. Again,
I updated touch to 7.8. Installed TT 3.0, installed EDO. I use HRT II+
USB DAC with hub. I am getting clicks and pops. Commented the priority
line in rcs.local file as suggested by John Swenson. Still I get the
clicks. Any suggestions?.
sportflyer wrote:
Does Squeezeplay , Moose or any Web interface degrade the quality of
the music stream to the SBT ? I only want to use it as a larger
controller screen than the SBT which is sitting 10 ft from my listening
position.
Your only problem is the fan noise from the laptop :)
34 matches
Mail list logo
