sckramer wrote:
> Then yeah the stock touch is pretty bad
Sorry but that is just a "load of crap" as they say. I'm confident that
you don't even have the proper measurements to support that. And without
the proper measurements to support it you really should not say such
things.
As mentioned,
Pascal Hibon wrote:
> Sorry but that is just a "load of crap" as they say. I'm confident that
> you don't even have the proper measurements to support that. And without
> the proper measurements to support it you really should not say such
> things.
> As mentioned, I've compared (A/B listening)
2string1 wrote:
> One person says the Remedy will do nothing and cost to much and another
> says use it. I know,ask a question on a forum and thats what you get...
if you ask 3 people you will get 5 opinions - but opinions are just
that, opinions. Everyone has at least one... How about looking
sckramer wrote:
> noise distorting spdif can vary wildly in how it translates to what you
> hear, it translates to bit errors, that changes the value of the 16bit
> sample (the amplitude) (44,000 of these a second)... this is streamed
> 16x44000 ~2.8Mbps stereo -- and the source clock is
kinku wrote:
> Does anyone know if touch EDO out work with this XMOS I2S converter
> board?
> http://www.diyinhk.com/shop/audio-kits/18-xmos-384khz-high-quality-usb-to-i2s-pcb-with-ultralow-noise-65uv-regulator.html
Yes, it works just fine.
Julf wrote:
> Coincidentally Mark Waldrep (of AIX Records) happened to have a blog
> posting about exactly that yesterday: 'Analog Sound Should Not Be A
> Goal' (http://www.realhd-audio.com/?p=5381).
yep, but I corrected myself:
should have said less digital, to me it's like a hash sound, or
